Effects of a conservative in-patient voice treatment on the voice-related self-concept.

PURPOSE: Observational study to determine if the voice-related self-concept as measured via the Fragebogen zur Erfassung des Stimmlichen Selbstkonzepts FESS (questionnaire for the assessment of the voice self-concept) can be improved through in-patient voice therapy. METHODS: 234 female and 80 male patients that underwent an intensive 3- to 4-week in-patient voice treatment due to varying types of dysphonia. After imputation of missing items but not missing questionnaires, 255 patients were eligible for FESS evaluation, 313 for VHI-12 evaluation. The German questionnaire for the assessment of the voice self-concept (FESS) and the German 12-item short-form of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-12) were administered at the beginning and at the end of the hospital stay. Before-after comparisons are made visually and via t test. RESULTS: The Voice Handicap was significantly reduced, demonstrating the effectiveness of the administered therapy. Of the three scales of the FESS, the relationship with one's own voice and the awareness of the use of one's own voice was increased and thus improved. The connection between voice and emotional changes decreased significantly but only slightly. CONCLUSION: Conservative voice rehabilitation can not only reduce the voice handicap, but also improve the voice self-concept and the results can be measured.

Cross-Validation and Normative Values for the German Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale.

Purpose The Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale (VTD Scale) is a self-rating questionnaire investigating physical symptoms in the larynx associated with vocal pathology. The aim of this work was to investigate the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the first German version and to provide normative data with thresholds for pathology and a scaling scheme. Study Design A retrospective multicenter study was performed. Method A total of 571 participants (409 female and 162 male), with a mean age of 47.2 years, were recruited at three German centers; of these, there were 447 participants with voice disorder and 124 vocally healthy participants. The clinical examination consisted of patient history, visual laryngeal examination, acoustic and aerodynamic assessment, perceptual analysis by the Grading-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain Scale, and subjective evaluation using the VTD Scale and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Statistics included group comparisons (t test and analysis of variance), Pearson correlation coefficient (between VTD Scale and VHI), and Cronbach's alpha to assess validity and reliability. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics was performed to examine VTD Scale's discriminatory ability and provide a cutoff score. Additionally, percentiles were applied to provide VTD Scale ranges. Results There were highly significant differences between healthy participants and participants with voice disorder regarding the total score and both subscales of the VTD Scale. Internal consistency was excellent (α = .928). We found moderate, positive correlation between the VTD Scale and VHI (ρ = .596, p < .001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.876 (p < .001, 95% confidence interval [0.846, 0.906]). VTD Scale ranges were no (score: 0-13), mild (score: 14-26), moderate (score: 27-40), and severe (score: 41-96) disorder. Conclusions Results confirm an excellent reliability and validity of the German VTD Scale. It provides additional and independent diagnostic information and is a useful instrument to complement voice assessment. The scaling into four severity subgroups allows the tool to be used for screening patients and considers a transferral to a voice specialist.

[Long-term course after inpatient speech therapy: educational and language development of children with severe specific language impairment (SLI)]. / Langzeitverlauf nach stationärer Sprachtherapie: schulische und sprachliche Entwicklung von Kindern mit schwerer spezifischer Sprachentwicklungsstörung (SES).

BACKGROUND: Studies from primarily English-speaking countries have shown that specific language impairments can lead to disadvantages in educational and professional development. Corresponding studies for Germany have not been published. This study surveys the educational and language outcomes of adolescents and young adults who were treated in an inpatient setting during childhood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 193 young adults who had received inpatient treatment between 1998 and 2005 at the Department of Communication Disorders of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery (ENT) of the Mainz University Medical Center were assessed. The cohort was contacted by telephone and interviewed about aspects of their educational and language development using a specially developed questionnaire. It was possible to include 70 participants in the study. RESULTS: Almost half (48.6%; n = 34) of the participants had attended a regular elementary school and 50% (n = 35) attended a special school with a focus on speech-language development (others: 1.4%, n = 1). Regarding school-leaving qualifications, 31.5% (n = 22) finished school with an Abitur/Fachabitur (high-school-level certificate), 33% (n = 23) with a Realschulabschluss (secondary school certificate), 30% (n = 21) with a Hauptschulabschluss (lower secondary certificate), and 4% (n = 3) with a special school certificate. Only one participant left school without a qualification. Of the interviewed participants, 71% (n = 50) do not feel any speech language limitations anymore. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a positive educational and language development of children with SLI after inpatient treatment in Germany. Over 90% of the participants finished school with a regular certification and most of them do not feel any speech and language limitations anymore.

[Outcome of Phoniatric Rehabilitation of Dysphagia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer]. / Beeinflussung von strukturellen Dysphagien durch eine phoniatrische Rehabilitation.

Surgical and nonsurgical management options for head and neck cancer frequently lead to impaired swallowing. Swallowing outcome can be assessed using subjective measures like inventories or applying clinical assessments concerning food selection, eating duration or the necessity of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and instrumental assessments like fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of an in-patient rehabilitation in patients with dysphagia after the treatment of head and neck cancer. At the begin and after completion of this treatment 219 participants (138 male) aged 62.8 ±â€Š10.2 years completed the German version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Integrating anamnestic and clinical assessment data a rating following the Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore (BODS) was conducted at both times.Swallowing function improved significantly in both assessments, but both parameters were only moderately correlated. Improvements in both parameters were not correlated.Both dimensions of dysphagia, expert assessment and subjective measures should be used complementary.

The Articulation Handicap Scale with 12 items (AHS-12): a short form of the Articulation Handicap Index (AHI).

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to produce a short instrument for measuring the subjectively experienced articulation handicap, i.e. the extent to which physical, functional, and emotional handicaps caused by a physical deficit are subjectively experienced. METHODS: The items for the short instrument were selected from the 30 items of the Articulation Handicap Index (AHI) by removing items on the basis of item-total correlations using data from 113 cancer survivors. Reliability and validity of the sum score of the corresponding item selection were used for determining the optimal item selection. This optimal item selection was compared with the AHI in an RCT with patients undergoing phoniatric routine diagnostics. RESULTS: With only 12 items left, the measurement instrument was still as reliable and valid as the AHI. With less than 12 items, reliability and validity decreased. In the RCT between the AHI (n = 41) and the 12-item selection (n = 40), reliability and validity of both instruments were the same, but processing times differed (AHI; 3.84 min; 12-item selection: 2.02 min). CONCLUSION: The 12-item selection, further referred to as the Articulation Handicap Scale with 12 items (AHS-12), provides nearly as much information as the original AHI.

[Training Curriculum for the Certificate "Diagnostics and Therapy of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, including FEES", of the German Society for Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology and the German Society for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery]. / Ausbildungscurriculum zum Zertifikat "Diagnostik und Therapie oropharyngealer Dysphagien, inklusive FEES" der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, about 5 million people of all ages suffer from dysphagia. Due to demographic change and improved medical care, the incidence of swallowing disorders is expected to increase. Dysphagia is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality and leads to a considerable financial burden on the health systems. The two most common causes of dysphagia are neurological disorders and head and neck cancer. Diagnostics and therapy have developed continuously over the past decades. In particular, the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has become an established part of dysphagia diagnostics. RESULTS: The certificate "Diagnostics and Therapy of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, incl. FEES" was developed by the German Society for Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology (DGPP) and the German Society for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO KHC) in cooperation with the German Professional Association for Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology and the German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists.It consists of three parts: the modules (A, B and C), the indirect supervision and a practical examination. Structure, detailed contents and requirements for obtaining the certificate are described in the following article. The qualification of the lecturers and auditors are also defined. CONCLUSION: The systematic training serves the quality assurance and establishment of standards in the diagnostics and therapy of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the area of phoniatrics and ear, nose and throat medicine.

Receptive and productive speech and language abilities in hearing-impaired children with German as a second language.

OBJECTIVES: Many studies examining early bilingualism in migrant populations focus on the development of the first language. As language acquisition is closely related to the hearing development, there is a critical need to investigate language development in hearing-impaired children being raised bilingually who were fitted with cochlear implants and/or hearing aids. Therefore, this research project aimed to study the linguistic development of hearing-impaired children being raised with German as a second language who were provided with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Further, the language development of these children is compared with that of hearing-impaired children being raised in a monolingual environment and with normal-hearing children being raised bilingually. METHODS: In this prospective study, we analyzed data from 95 typically developing children with hearing loss (43 bilingual and 52 monolingual) aged 3;0 to 10;11 (years; months) on four language measures in German: receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary, receptive grammar, productive grammar (sentence repetition). Additionally, 30 bilingual children with normal hearing were included in this study. RESULTS: 44 children were provided with hearing aids in both ears; 34 used cochlear implants bilaterally and 17 were fitted bimodally. Statistical analysis showed that bilingual hearing-impaired children scored significantly poorer than monolingual hearing-impaired children. CONCLUSION: Hearing-impaired children being raised bilingually should have speech and language examinations on a regular basis. An examination of both languages would be desirable in order to be able to fully assess speech and language acquisition.

Clinical trial of the D.E.L.P.H.I.N. speech treatment for children and adolescents who stutter.

Purpose: The present trial investigated the D.E.L.P.H.I.N. (Deblockierungsimpuls, Entspannung, Logopädie, Phonetik, Hör-Wahrnehmungstraining, Intensität, nasaler Schwingungsakzent) speech treatment for children and adolescents who stutter, an approach using fluency shaping with an intensive time schedule and group sessions. Methods: Participants were 42 male and 14 female persons who stuttered with a median age of 13.0 years. Participants and their parents completed the strength and difficulties questionnaire at the beginning of the therapy and 1 year later. Participants completed the Speech Questionnaire, an instrument to measure the impact of stuttering, twice before and twice after completing the therapy. The stuttering rate and mean length of the three longest stuttering events were studied four times in videos of interviews, reading texts and three telephone calls. Outcomes are reported for the 56 children and young adults who stuttered and who completed D.E.L.P.H.I.N. The main analysis was performed using linear mixed models. Results: Quality of life as measured in the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - filled in by the participants/their parents - increased significantly from before the start of the therapy to 1 year after completion of the therapy. The subjective rating of the impact of stuttering also improved significantly. The stuttering rate and mean length of the longest stuttering event decreased significantly for all three modes from pre-treatment to 12 months post-treatment. Conclusions: After D.E.L.P.H.I.N., a significant improvement of the relevant endpoints quality of life, impact of stuttering, and severity of stuttering is observed.

Validation of the second version of the LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire (LEESPQ) in German-speaking children with normal hearing.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of neonatal hearing screening and the increasingly early age at which children can receive a cochlear implant has intensified the need for a validated questionnaire to assess the speech production of children aged 0‒18. Such a questionnaire has been created, the LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire (LEESPQ). This study aimed to validate a second, revised edition of the LEESPQ. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Questionnaires were returned for 362 children with normal hearing. Completed questionnaires were analysed to determine if the LEESPQ is reliable, prognostically accurate, internally consistent, and if gender or multilingualism affects total scores. RESULTS: Total scores correlated positively with age. The LEESPQ is reliable, accurate, and consistent, and independent of gender or lingual status. A norm curve was created. DISCUSSION: This second version of the LEESPQ is a valid tool to assess the speech production development of children with normal hearing, aged 0‒18, regardless of their gender. As such, the LEESPQ may be a useful tool to monitor the development of paediatric hearing device users. CONCLUSION: The second version of the LEESPQ is a valid instrument for assessing early speech production of children aged 0‒18 months.

[Swallowing Disorders in Tracheo(s)tomized Patients]. / Schluckstörungen bei tracheo(s)tomierten Patienten.

Objective Since many years it has been conjectured that tracheotomy/tracheostomy interferes with swallowing and leads to a higher risk of aspiration. The aim of this review was to contribute to the discussion whether there is a causal relationship between tracheotomy/tracheostomy and dysphagia or only a chronological concomitance. Material and Methods Citations for this review rest upon a research in PubMed data base of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Results Effects of tracheostomy/tracheotomy as well as effects of different cannulas on motoric and sensory aspects of deglutition have been reviewed. Most papers focused on aspiration. Reported data were extremely heterogeneous. Finally no causal relationship between tracheotomy and dysphagia could be demonstrated. Conclusions Tracheo(s)tomized patients require a special awareness in respect to concomitant dysphagia. However, swallowing problems are considered to be primarily caused rather by underlying diseases than by the existence of the tracheostomy itself.