A comparison of dementia diagnoses and cognitive function measures in Medicare claims and the Minimum Data Set.

BACKGROUND: Gold standard dementia assessments are rarely available in large real-world datasets, leaving researchers to choose among methods with imperfect but acceptable accuracy to identify nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. In healthcare claims, options include claims-based diagnosis algorithms, diagnosis indicators, and cognitive function measures in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), but few studies have compared these. We evaluated the proportion of NH residents identified with possible dementia and concordance of these three. METHODS: Using a 20% random sample of 2018-2019 Medicare beneficiaries, we identified MDS admission assessments for non-skilled NH stays among individuals with continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D. Dementia was identified using: (1) Chronic Conditions Warehouse (CCW) claims-based algorithm for Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementia; (2) MDS active diagnosis indicators for Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementias; and (3) the MDS Cognitive Function Scale (CFS) (at least mild cognitive impairment). We compared the proportion of admissions with evidence of possible dementia using each criterion and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of the CCW claims definition and MDS indicators for identifying any impairment on the CFS. RESULTS: Among 346,013 non-SNF NH admissions between 2018 and 2019, 57.2% met criteria for at least one definition (44.7% CFS, 40.7% CCW algorithm, 26.0% MDS indicators). The MDS CFS uniquely identified the greatest proportion with evidence of dementia. The CCW claims algorithm had 63.7% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity for identifying any cognitive impairment on the CFS. Active diagnosis indicators from the MDS had lower sensitivity (47.0%), but higher specificity (91.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Claims- and MDS-based methods for identifying NH residents with possible dementia have only partial overlap in the cohorts they identify, and neither is an obvious gold standard. Future studies should seek to determine whether additional functional assessments from the MDS or prescriptions can improve identification of possible dementia in this population.

Initiative to deprescribe high-risk drugs for older adults presenting to the emergency department after falls.

BACKGROUND: Over 35 million falls occur in older adults annually and are associated with increased emergency department (ED) revisits and 1-year mortality. Despite associations between medications and falls, the prevalence of fall risk-increasing drugs remains high. Our objective was to implement an ED-based medication reconciliation for patients presenting after falls and determine whether an intervention targeting high-risk medications was related to decreased future falls. METHODS: This was an observational prospective cohort study at a single site in the United States. Adults 65 years and older presenting to the ED after falls had a pharmacist review their medicines. Pharmacists made recommendations to taper, stop, or discuss medications with the primary clinician. At 3, 6, and 12 months, we recorded the number of fall-related return ED visits and determined if recommended medication changes had been implemented. We compared the rate of return visits of patients who had followed the medication change recommendations and those who received recommendations but had no change in their medications using chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 577 patients (mean age 81 years, 63.6% female) were enrolled of 1509 potentially eligible patients. High-risk medications were identified in 310 patients (53.7%) who received medication recommendations. High-risk medications were associated with repeat fall-related visits at 12 months (risk difference 8.1% [95% confidence interval 0.97-15.0]). A total of 134 (43%) patients on high-risk medications had evidence of medication modification. At 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in return fall visits between patients who had modifications to medications compared with those who had not implemented changes (p = 0.551). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified opportunities for medication optimization in over half of emergency visits for falls and demonstrated that medication counseling in the ED is feasible. However, evaluation of the effect on future falls was limited.

The Impact of Scholarly Concentration Programs on Graduates' Career Choices and Interest in the Care of Older Patients.

BACKGROUND: More geriatricians are needed to care for the aging population. Geriatric scholarly concentration programs (GSCPs) may promote medical students' interest in this underserved field or careers working with older adults. Additionally, graduates of GSCPs may be more comfortable and competent in providing care for older adults. Surveys were administered to graduates of GSCPs to determine the role of these programs in shaping medical students' careers and views about caring for older adults.  Methods: The purpose of this study is to understand the impact of GSCPs on medical graduates' career choices and self-perceived skill and comfort in caring for older adults. A Qualtrics survey (Qualtrics International Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States) was developed and distributed to 83 graduates of four GSCPs in the United States. Data were analyzed using a significance level of p>0.05 for all tests. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize the data. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to test for significant differences in interest in pursuing a career in geriatrics or working with older adults. Qualitative responses were coded and analyzed for themes.  Results: A total of 34 out of 83 surveyed graduates of GSCPs indicated a higher interest in geriatrics as a career as well as increased comfort and self-perceived skill in caring for older adults after completing the GSCP. The components of the GSCP that most strongly improved the participants' ability to care for older adults included the curriculum (n=31, 91%) and mentoring (n=28, 82%). An overwhelming majority of survey participants felt GSCPs should be offered as part of medical school programming (n=33, 97%).  Conclusion: This study suggests that GSCPs increase interest and competence in caring for older adults and increase interest in a career in geriatrics. GSCPs should be implemented across medical schools.

Deprescribing bisphosphonates for older adults with dementia: perspectives of caregivers.

Little is known about caregivers' perspectives on deprescribing bisphosphonates for older adults with dementia. Caregivers agreed that fracture prevention was important for maintaining functional independence but acknowledged that changing goals of care may justify deprescribing. Conversations grounded in "what matters most" can align fracture prevention treatment with goals of care. PURPOSE: The long-term fracture prevention benefits of bisphosphonates may begin to be overshadowed by the potential burden of adverse effects and polypharmacy for older adults living with dementia as the disease progresses. We characterized factors that influence caregiver decision-making for continuing versus deprescribing bisphosphonates for persons living with dementia. METHODS: We conducted 11 interviews with family or informal caregivers of older adults living with dementia in the community or in long-term care who had been treated with bisphosphonates. Interviews focused on experiences caring for someone who has experienced a fracture, perceived benefits and harms of bisphosphonates, and experiences with deprescribing. Analyses were conducted using a qualitative framework methodology guided by the Health Belief Model. RESULTS: Most caregivers were male (n = 8), younger than 65 (n = 8) and were an adult child caregiver (n = 8). Three caregivers were Black and five were Latino/a. Attempts to maintain functional independence despite high likelihood of falls was frequently discussed as contributing to fracture risk, in this population. Many caregivers perceived fracture prevention treatment as important, while several noted that it may become less important near the end of life. Perceived benefits of fracture prevention treatment for persons with dementia included improved quality of life and maintaining independence. Although most indicated that bisphosphonates were well tolerated, gastrointestinal adverse effects, preference for fewer treatments, and dementia-related behaviors that interfere with medication administration may be reasons for deprescribing. CONCLUSION: Conversations grounded in caregiver experiences and "what matters most" may help optimize fracture prevention treatment for older adults with dementia.

Patient Perceptions of Opioids and Benzodiazepines and Attitudes Toward Deprescribing.

BACKGROUND: Opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs) pose a public health problem. Older adults are especially susceptible to adverse events from opioids and BZDs owing to an increased usage of opioids and BZDs, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Deprescribing is a possible, yet challenging, solution to reducing opioid and BZD use. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore older adult patients' knowledge of opioids and BZDs, perceived facilitators and barriers to deprescribing opioids and BZDs, and attitudes toward alternative treatments for opioids and BZDs. METHODS: We conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with patients aged 65+ years with long-term opioid and/or BZD prescriptions. The interview guide was developed by an interprofessional team and focused on patients' knowledge of opioids and BZDs, perceived ability to reduce opioid or BZD use, and attitudes towards alternative treatments. RESULTS: Three patients had taken opioids, either currently or in the past, three had taken BZDs, and five had taken both opioids and BZDs. Generally, knowledge of opioids and BZDs was variable among patients; yet facilitators and barriers to deprescribing both opioids and BZDs were consistent. Facilitators of deprescribing included patient-provider trust and slow tapering of medications, while barriers included concerns about re-emergence of symptoms and a lack of motivation, particularly if medications and symptoms were stable. Patients were generally unenthusiastic about pursuing alternative pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic alternatives to opioids and BZDs for symptom management. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that patients are open to deprescribing opioids and BZDs under certain circumstances, but overall remain hesitant with a lack of enthusiasm for alternative treatments. Future studies should focus on supportive approaches to alleviate older adults' deprescribing concerns.

Geriatric Telehealth: A Standardized Patient Case for Medical Students.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the rapid expansion of telemedicine. However, there has been minimal coverage of telemedicine in traditional undergraduate medicine curricula. Telemedicine presents specific challenges in the geriatric population, including unfamiliarity with technology, cognitive and sensory barriers, inclusion of family and/or caregivers, multimorbidity, and a high degree of medical complexity. Methods: We developed a workshop to allow rising third-year medical students to practice a telemedicine patient encounter while developing skills for assessing and communicating with geriatric patients. This 90-minute workshop consisted of an introductory didactic presentation and a standardized patient activity for small groups of two to five students. Students' level of comfort with telemedicine for assessment of geriatric patients was evaluated with a pre- and postsurvey. Results: Fifty-eight students participated in the workshop and completed the surveys (presurvey = 58, postsurvey = 40), with roughly half (52%) reporting prior experience with telemedicine. A 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = very comfortable) was used. Students reported statistically significant increases in comfort using telemedicine (presurvey = 3.1, postsurvey = 3.9, p < .001) and using telemedicine for patients ≥65 years (presurvey = 2.8, postsurvey = 3.9, p < .001) after completing the workshop. Discussion: Medical students' comfort levels using telemedicine and caring for patients ages 65 and older with a telehealth visit improved after participating in this workshop. To help prepare students for telehealth practice in their future careers, educators should provide them with opportunities to practice and develop this critical skill set.

Prescriber Perspectives and Experiences with Deprescribing Versus Continuing Bisphosphonates in Older Nursing Home Residents with Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Few guidelines address fracture prevention medication use in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify factors that influence prescriber decision-making for deprescribing of bisphosphonates for older NH residents with dementia. METHODS: We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with prescribers who care for older adults with dementia in NHs. MAIN MEASURES: Interview prompts addressed experiences treating fractures, benefits, and harms of bisphosphonates, and experiences with deprescribing. Coding was guided by the social-ecological framework including patient-level (intrapersonal) and external (interpersonal, system, community, and policy) influences. RESULTS: Most prescribers were physicians (83%); 75% were female and 75% were White. Most (75%) spent less than half of their clinical effort in NHs and half were in the first decade of practice. Among patient-level influences, prescribers uniformly agreed that a prior bisphosphonate treatment course of several years, emergence of adverse effects, and changing goals of care or limited life expectancy were compelling reasons to deprescribe. External influences were frequently discussed as barriers to deprescribing. At the interpersonal level, prescribers noted that family/informal caregivers are diverse in their involvement in decision-making, and frequently concerned about the adverse effects of bisphosphonates, but perceive deprescribing as "withdrawing care." At the health system level, prescribers felt that frequent transitions make it difficult to determine duration of prior treatment and to implement deprescribing. At the policy level, prescribers highlighted the lack of guidelines addressing residents with limited mobility and dementia or criteria for deprescribing, including uncertainty in the setting of prior fractures and lack of bone densitometry in NHs. CONCLUSION: Systems-level barriers to evaluating bone densitometry and treatment history in NHs may impede person-centered decision-making for fracture prevention. Further research is needed to evaluate the residual benefits of bisphosphonates in medically complex residents with limited mobility and dementia to inform recommendations for deprescribing versus continued use.

Primary-Care Prescribers' Perspectives on Deprescribing Opioids and Benzodiazepines in Older Adults.

PURPOSE: Opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs) are frequently implicated as contributing to falls in older adults. Deprescribing of these medications continues to be challenging. This study evaluated primary-care prescribers' confidence in and perceptions of deprescribing opioids and BZDs for older adults. METHODS: For this study, we conducted a quantitative analysis of survey data combined with an analysis of qualitative data from a focus group. A survey evaluating prescriber confidence in deprescribing opioids and BZDs was distributed to providers at 15 primary-care clinics in North Carolina between March-December 2020. Average confidence (scale 0-100) for deprescribing opioids, deprescribing BZDs, and deprescribing under impeding circumstances were reported. A virtual focus group was conducted in March 2020 to identify specific barriers and facilitators to deprescribing opioids and BZDs. Audio recordings and transcripts were analyzed using inductive coding. RESULTS: We evaluated 61 survey responses (69.3% response rate). Respondents were predominantly physicians (54.8%), but also included nurse practitioners (24.6%) and physician assistants (19.4%). Average overall confidence in deprescribing was comparable for opioids (64.5) and BZDs (65.9), but was lower for deprescribing under impeding circumstances (53.7). In the focus group, prescribers noted they met more resistance when deprescribing BZDs and that issues such as lack of time, availability of mental health resources, and patients seeing multiple prescribers were barriers to deprescribing. CONCLUSION: Findings from quantitative and qualitative analyses identified that prescribers were moderately confident in their ability to deprescribe both opioids and BZDs in older adults, but less confident under potentially impeding circumstances. Future studies are needed to evaluate policies and interventions to overcome barriers to deprescribing opioids and BZDs in primary care.