RESUMEN
Secondary prevention of skin cancer consists in early detection of malignant lesions through patients' mole self-examination and medical examination. The objective of this study was to assess the self-reported frequency of mole examination in a large, representative sample of the adult general population of 17 countries from all continents. Of a total of 17,001 participants, 4.8% had their moles checked by a dermatologist more than once a year, 11.3% once a year, 8.4% every 2-3 years, 12.4% once in a while, 10.3% once in lifetime, and 52.6% of participants had never performed a mole examination. Egypt was the country with the highest prevalence of people who performed a moles check more than once a year (15.9%), followed by Brazil and the USA. A higher frequency of mole checks was associated with sex (man vs woman), higher education, higher income, fair phototype, history of skin cancer, medical insurance, and sun-protective behaviours. Despite recommendations by health providers, it appears that the frequency of mole checks in the general population is still low. It is necessary for dermatologists to keep informing at-risk populations about the importance of moles check, with particular care regarding categories that less frequently adhere to secondary prevention measures.
Asunto(s)
Dermatólogos , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoexamen , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Nevo/epidemiología , Nevo/diagnóstico , Prevención Secundaria , Salud Global , Adolescente , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New anticancer therapies have improved patient outcomes but associated dermatologic adverse events (AEs) may cause morbidity and treatment discontinuation. A comprehensive estimation of associations between cancer drugs and skin AEs is lacking. METHODS: This study utilized the Food and Drug Administartion (FDA)'s Adverse Event Reporting System database (January 2013-September 2022), with 3,399,830 reports involving 3084 drugs and 16,348 AEs. A nearest neighbor matching model was employed to select 10 controls for each case report, utilizing the cosine similarity of demographic and AE severity factors to minimize false positives/negatives. RESULTS: There were 10,698 unique anticancer drugs (n = 212) to skin AE (n = 873) pairs, of which 676 had significant reporting odds ratios (ROR) > 1, comprising 113 drugs and 144 AEs. The minimum ROR was 1.25, and 50% of associations displayed a ROR >10. The most common were rash (51 agents) and dry skin (28 drugs). Methotrexate induced the most distinct AEs (34), then mechlorethamine (33), and vemurafenib (24). Targeted therapies accounted for 49% of pairs, cytotoxic chemotherapies for 35.9%, and immunotherapies for 11%. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 113 anticancer drugs were identified as significantly associated with skin AEs, most frequently rash and dry skin. Data are likely under-reported but enable quick postmarketing identification of skin toxicity signals.
RESUMEN
Cancer systemic therapeutics and radiotherapy are often associated with dermatological toxicities that may reduce patients' quality of life and impact their course of cancer treatment. These toxicities cover a wide range of conditions that can be complex to manage with increasing severity. This review provides details on twelve common dermatological toxicities encountered during cancer treatment and offers measures for their prevention and management, particularly in the Australian/New Zealand context where skincare requirements may differ to other regions due to higher cumulative sun damage caused by high ambient ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. Given the frequency of these dermatological toxicities, a proactive phase is envisaged where patients can actively try to prevent skin toxicities.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with erythema, inflammation and skin sensitivity. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of a dermocosmetic cream (DC cream) containing Sphingobioma xenophaga extract and soothing agent in adult females with rosacea-associated erythema and sensitive skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During phase 1, DC was applied twice daily on the randomized half-face and compared to usual-skincare (USC) for 28 days. During phase 2, DC was applied on the full face twice daily for 56 days. Clinical, instrumental and skin sensitivity assessments were performed at all visits; demodex density (standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) method) was performed at baseline and D28, quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the stigmatization questionnaire (SQ), Rosacea Quality of Life index (ROSAQoL) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline and D84. RESULTS: At D28, a significant benefit of DC over USC was observed for erythema, tightness, burning and stinging (all p ≤ 0.05), erythema measured by chromameter (p < 0.01), corneometry and transepidermal water loss (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively), skin sensitivity (p < 0.001) and significant reduction of mean demodex density (p < 0.05) on the DC side. At D84, DC significantly (all p < 0.05) improved clinical signs and symptoms on both sides of the face compared to baseline; SQ, ROSAQoL and DLQI scores improved by 40.4%, 25.0% and 55.7%, respectively compared to baseline. Tolerance was excellent. CONCLUSION: DC significantly improved erythema, skin sensitivity, demodex count, QoL and feeling of stigmatization of subjects with rosacea and is very well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Eritema , Calidad de Vida , Rosácea , Crema para la Piel , Humanos , Rosácea/tratamiento farmacológico , Rosácea/complicaciones , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Eritema/tratamiento farmacológico , Crema para la Piel/administración & dosificación , Animales , AncianoRESUMEN
The relationship between skin diseases and mental illnesses has been extensively studied using cross-sectional epidemiological data. Typically, such data can only measure association (rather than causation) and include only a subset of the diseases we may be interested in. In this paper, we complement the evidence from such analyses by learning an overarching causal network model over twelve health conditions from the Google Search Trends Symptoms public data set. We learned the causal network model using a dynamic Bayesian network, which can represent both cyclic and acyclic causal relationships, is easy to interpret and accounts for the spatio-temporal trends in the data in a probabilistically rigorous way. The causal network confirms a large number of cyclic relationships between the selected health conditions and the interplay between skin and mental diseases. For acne, we observe a cyclic relationship with anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and an indirect relationship with depression through sleep disorders. For dermatitis, we observe directed links to anxiety, depression and sleep disorders and a cyclic relationship with ADHD. We also observe a link between dermatitis and ADHD and a cyclic relationship between acne and ADHD. Furthermore, the network includes several direct connections between sleep disorders and other health conditions, highlighting the impact of the former on the overall health and well-being of the patient. The average R 2 for a condition given the values of all conditions in the previous week is 0.67: in particular, 0.42 for acne, 0.85 for asthma, 0.58 for ADHD, 0.87 for burn, 0.76 for erectile dysfunction, 0.88 for scars, 0.57 for alcohol disorders, 0.57 for anxiety, 0.53 for depression, 0.74 for dermatitis, 0.60 for sleep disorders and 0.66 for obesity. Mapping disease interplay, indirect relationships, and the key role of mediators, such as sleep disorders, will allow healthcare professionals to address disease management holistically and more effectively. Even if we consider all skin and mental diseases jointly, each disease subnetwork is unique, allowing for more targeted interventions.
Asunto(s)
Teorema de Bayes , Humanos , Encéfalo , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Piel/patología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Acné Vulgar , Estudios Transversales , Depresión , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Geles , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Masculino , Adolescente , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Cara , Administración CutáneaRESUMEN
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease associated with a significant patient burden on quality-of-life. Given skin barrier including skin microbiome changes are linked to AD pathogenesis, prebiotic emollients are shown to improve disease symptoms and maintain skin barrier integrity, normalizing skin microbiota. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prebiotic skincare routine in improving AD and xerosis, and ultimately quality-of-life in ethnically diverse patients. A total of 140 subjects from different racial/ethnic backgrounds, aged 3-80 years old with skin phototypes I-VI, and presenting with mild-AD or severe xerosis completed study. Expert grading, instrumentation, self-assessment questionnaires, plus clinical imaging demonstrated that a prebiotic cleanser and moisturizer routine significantly reduced skin conditions severity, strengthened skin barrier properties in both lesional and normal skin, and improved patients' quality-of-life while providing itch relief as soon as 4 weeks. The results of this research indicate that a prebiotic cleanser and moisturizer regimen offers benefits for diverse patient’s daily skincare routine by effectively managing AD and xerosis severity and symptoms, normalizing skin microbiota, plus preserving skin barrier integrity to prevent long-term sequelae. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:3(Suppl 2):s12-22.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Piel , Protocolos Clínicos , Difenhidramina , Progresión de la Enfermedad , PrebióticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin is a common condition affecting a significant proportion of the population, and there is a growing demand for effective and safe management. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a cream containing panthenol, prebiotics, and probiotic lysate as an optimal care for facial sensitive skin. METHODS: A total of 110 participants (64 in group A and 46 in group B) with facial sensitive skin applied the cream twice daily for 28 days. Group A evaluated their sensitive skin, product efficacy, and product use experience at D0 (15 min), D1, D14, and D28. In group B, skin barrier function-related indicators were measured at baseline and on D1, D7, D14, and D28. Dermatologists evaluated tolerance for all participants. RESULTS: After 28 days of use, in group A, 100% of participants reported mildness and comfort with product use. Participants demonstrated significant improvements in skin barrier function-related indicators, including increased stratum corneum moisture content, reduced erythema index, elevated sebum content, decreased trans-epidermal water loss, and diminished skin redness parameter a* value (all p < 0.05). Dermatologist evaluations revealed excellent tolerance among all participants. CONCLUSION: The panthenol-enriched cream with prebiotics and probiotic lysate exhibited substantial clinical efficacy in ameliorating facial sensitive skin conditions, coupled with a high safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Dermatosis Facial , Probióticos , Humanos , Prebióticos/efectos adversos , Probióticos/efectos adversos , Ácido Pantoténico , EmolientesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acne vulgaris (acne) is characterized by both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% is approved to treat acne but may cause skin irritation and/or contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To compare the benefit in acne of a multitargeted dermocosmetic cream containing salicylic acid, lipohydroxy acid, niacinamide, 2-oleamido-1,3-octadecanediol, piroctone olamine, zinc, Aqua posae filiformis, and thermal spring water (DC-Eff) to BPO 5% gel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 150 Caucasian subjects (50% female) aged between 18 and 40 years, with mild to moderate acne according to the GEA (Global Evaluation of Acne) grading system were randomized into two parallel groups (DC-Eff or BPO to be applied twice daily for 56 days). IGA (investigator global assessment), GEA, lesion count, clinical signs and symptoms, and subject assessment were evaluated at baseline, and after 28 and 56 days (D28 and D56) of treatment. RESULTS: The responder analyses of the IGA and GEA scores showed that 62.2% and 47.3%, respectively, in the DC-Eff, compared with 50.0% and 36.5%, respectively, in the BPO, had improved by at least one point at D56. Inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and total lesion counts significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased with both products from baseline, with no between-group difference. Subjects considered that their skin was smoother and that DC-Eff was easy to apply. DC-Eff was better tolerated than BPO. CONCLUSIONS: DC-Eff applied twice daily is as beneficial as BPO in improving mild-to-moderate acne. DC-Eff was better tolerated than BPO and highly appreciated.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Acné Vulgar/patología , Peróxido de Benzoílo/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Geles , Ácido Salicílico/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this article, we review and discuss the photoprotection behavior of Asians based on the literature, along with a subanalysis of an original online survey, and make recommendations to optimize photoprotection for Asian populations to prevent photoaging and pigmentary disorders. METHODS: An international panel of eight dermatologists from Asia (China, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, and Vietnam) met to discuss sunscreen photoprotection for Asian patients. Additionally, a subanalysis of an online survey by 3000 respondents from three Asian countries (China, Indonesia, and Japan) investigated general public awareness and attitudes to sun exposure. RESULTS: A pre-meeting survey of the eight experts from Asia showed key concerns of Asian patients consulting dermatologists are pigmentary disorders, especially actinic/senile lentigo, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, melasma, vitiligo, and Hori's nevus. The survey subanalysis of participants from China, Indonesia, and Japan with predominantly Fitzpatrick skin types (FST) II to IV revealed that they are particularly concerned about sun exposure causing photoaging and pigmentary disorders. Most of the respondents indicated they have limited knowledge on sunlight radiation and appropriate sunscreen protection factors. Only 22%, 13%, and 3% for China, Indonesia, and Japan, respectively, systematically use multiple protective measures (using sunscreen, avoiding midday sun, staying in the shade, wearing a hat, protective clothing, and sunglasses) when exposed to the sun. CONCLUSIONS: Further education is needed for Asian populations on the importance of comprehensive daily photoprotection, including broad-spectrum sunscreen, with high UVA and visible light protection, to reduce and prevent photoaging and pigmentary disorders.
Asunto(s)
Lentigo , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , AsiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Topical retinoids cause retinoid-induced skin discomfort (RISD) mainly during the first weeks of use leading to noncompliance and premature treatment discontinuation. A dermocosmetic (DC) may help to reduce treatment-related signs and symptoms and improve adherence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of a DC regimen compared to a routine skin care regimen (RC) by reducing RISD signs and symptoms induced by a retinoid/benzoyl peroxide fixed-drug combination in subjects with acne. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, comparative study in subjects ≥16 years with mild to moderate acne candidates to a topical adapalene/BPO fixed drug combination (A/BPO). Evaluations took place at Day 0, 7, 14, 28, and 84 and included erythema, desquamation, burning, itching and stinging and RISD (SD, a composite score of local treatment-related signs and symptoms and acne severity. Subjects used daily the DC or RC together with the fixed combination for 84 days. RESULTS: Eighty-eight subjects were included, the mean age was 21 years; 84% were females. At Day 0 the SD score was 0.8 in both groups. A statistically significant difference in terms of skin sensitivity with DC compared to RC (1.6 points, vs. 2.4 points p < 0.05) was observed at Day 14. Clinical sign and symptom scores were more reduced with DC than with RC at all time points. Acne severity improved in both groups. CONCLUSION: DC significantly reduces A/BPO-related RISD compared to RC, especially during the first 14 days of treatment, without interfering with the clinical efficacy of the treatment, thus helping to maintain treatment adherence.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Masculino , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Retinoides/uso terapéutico , Naftalenos/uso terapéutico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Peróxido de Benzoílo , Adapaleno/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Resultado del Tratamiento , GelesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A dermocosmetic (DC) containing salicylic acid, niacinamide, and thermal spring water has been developed for the management of mild to moderate acne. AIM: To assess the efficacy of DC as an adjunct to benzoyl peroxide (BPO) every other day compared with BPO over 3 months, and its efficacy as maintenance post-BPO care compared with vehicle for another 3 months. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients with mild to moderate facial acne according to the Global Acne Severity (GEA) Scale. During phase 1, subjects received either BPO + vehicle (vehicle group) or BPO + DC (DC group) for 12 weeks. During phase 2, patients were re-randomized to receive either the vehicle or the DC for 12 weeks. Assessments included inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count, acne severity using the GEA Scale, local tolerance, quality of life, and quantity of product used. RESULTS: During phase 1, both groups, DC and vehicle, reached the same level of efficacy at month 3, although the quantity of BPO used was significantly reduced in the DC group (P=0.0001). During phase 2, acne continued to significantly improve (all P<0.05) in the DC group, as did clinical signs and symptoms; while patients randomized to vehicle reported relapses of their acne and related symptoms. CONCLUSION: The use of DC significantly reduces the need for BPO with no impact on the efficacy of mild to moderate acne. The use of DC as a maintenance post-BPO allowed a significant reduction of acne relapse compared with vehicle after 3 months of follow-up, with a good tolerance. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1172-1177. doi:10.36849/JDD.7449R1.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adapaleno , Peróxido de Benzoílo/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Calidad de Vida , Ácido Salicílico/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
Skin toxicities are very common in patients undergoing cancer treatment and have been found to occur with all types of cancer therapeutic interventions (cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy). Further, skin toxicities can lead to interruption or even discontinuation of anticancer treatment in some patients, translating to suboptimal outcomes. Dermocosmetics (or cosmeceuticals)-defined as skincare solutions incorporating dermatologically active ingredients (beyond vehicle effects) that directly improve symptoms of various skin conditions-are increasingly being used in cancer care to prevent and manage skin toxicities. The active ingredients in these products have a measurable biological action in skin; they typically improve skin integrity (barrier function/hydration and other factors) while relieving skin symptoms. The Association Francophone des Soins Oncologiques de Support (AFSOS) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) partnered to select a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients with cancer and skin toxicities. The group reviewed existing literature and created a summary of recommendations for managing these toxicities through online meetings and communication. In this publication, the group (1) reviews new skin toxicities seen with oncology drugs and (2) evaluates the role of dermocosmetics in improving patient outcomes and minimizing cancer treatment interruptions. We provide general recommendations for initiation and selection of skin care in all oncology patients as well as recommendations for what factors should be considered when using dermocosmetics in specific types of skin toxicities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Enfermedades de la Piel , Humanos , Consenso , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/etiología , Piel , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The appearance of actinic lentigines mainly found on face, back of the hands, upper back and décolleté is associated with chronic sun exposure. However, there is no study looking at the role of long UVA specifically in the development of actinic lentigines. This study was conducted in 20 Japanese adult women exposed on the upper back area three times per week for 6 weeks to incremental sub-erythemal UVA1 doses (5 J/cm2 at weeks 1 and 2, 10 J/cm2 at weeks 3 and 4 and 15 J/cm2 at weeks 5 and 6). Clinical assessment, performed on day 0 (before any exposure), and on days 14, 28 and 42, included the evaluation of skin pigmentation (pigmented spots), chromametry of the pigmented skin lesions and measurement of dyschromy. The number of pigmented spots and uniformity of the skin's pigmentation were clearly increased in comparison with baseline, statistical significance of the difference (p < 0.05) being reached at D 28 and D 42 in both cases. In conclusion, repeated sub-erythemal UVA1 exposure induces the development of actinic lentigines. Thus, a suitable protection including long UVA coverage is also needed to prevent from the damages induced by low, sub-erythemal doses of UV exposure.
Asunto(s)
Lentigo , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad , Trastornos de la Pigmentación , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Piel , Eritema/etiología , Lentigo/etiologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing disease with a pathophysiology including skin barrier damage, microbiome disbalance and inflammation. Classically, emollients maintaining a healthy microbiome are recommended as the basis of any AD severity management. Objective: To assess the benefit of a light balm containing vitamin E, tocopherol and glycerine and enriched with Aqua posae filiformis and microresyl (Emollient+) in subjects with mild AD over a period of 168 days. Materials and Methods: For this open-label study, subjects above 3 years of age with mild and stable AD for at least 6 months before inclusion and with a SCORAD score of <25 were eligible. Assessments took place at baseline, D14, D28, D84 and D168, and included SCORAD, flare frequency, severity of clinical signs and symptoms, skin hydration status using a Corneometer and local tolerance. QoL was assessed using the DLQI or CDLQI questionnaire. Subjects used Emollient+ at least once daily. Results: Overall, 56 subjects were included in this study. The mean age was 25.0±20.0 years (45% children); 69.6% were females. Except for erythema in the paediatric population, all clinical parameters had significantly (all p < 0.05) improved at D28. At D168, SCORAD, signs and symptoms had significantly (all p < 0.05) improved in the global, adult and paediatric population at D168 compared to baseline. So did flares, skin hydration and QoL. The regimen was very well tolerated. Conclusion: Emollient+ is highly beneficial and well tolerated in mild AD with early benefits in improving AD signs and symptoms and skin hydration as well as the QoL of subjects as soon as D28. Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT05783453.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Behavioural interventions can improve attitudes towards sun protection but the impact remains inconsistent worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To assess awareness of and attitudes towards the multiple facets of sun exposure and suggest ways to improve prevention from overexposure to the sun in all geographical zones and multiple skin types. METHODS: Online survey was conducted from 28 September to 18 October 2021. Study population was selected from the Ipsos online Panel (3,540,000 panellists), aged ≥18 years, from 17 countries around the five continents. Demographics, sun-exposure habits and practices, understanding of risks and information on phototypes were documented and analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-eight per cent of participants knew that sunlight can cause skin health problems (90% phototypes I-II, 82% phototypes V-VI, >90% in American and European countries, 72% in Asia and 85% in Africa). Eighty-five per cent used some form of protection against sunlight, predominantly: Seeking shade (77%), avoiding the midday sun (66%), facial application of sunscreen (60%) and wearing protective clothing (44%). The perception of sunlight itself is positive ('it gives energy' for 82%; 'tanned skin looks attractive' for 72%), although less in Asian countries and among individuals with dark skin phototypes. Eighty-three per cent reported having experienced sunburn, mainly in Australia, Canada, USA, Germany, France and Russia, and among individuals with dark skin phototypes. Only 12% systematically/often used all types of protection during exposure to the sun and 23% believed it is safe to go out in the sun with no protection when their skin is already tanned. From 13% (skin phototype I) to 26% (phototype VI) reported not using any form of protection against the sun. Knowledge and habits were significantly superior among people who are accustomed to seeing a dermatologist for a complete skin exam. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists could play a crucial role in relaying novel prevention messages, more finely tailored to specific risks, populations and areas of the world.