What is associated with nutrition risk in very old age?

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with nutrition risk among a purposive sample of those in advanced aged. DESIGN: A cross sectional feasibility study. SETTING: Three North Island locations in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eight community-living residents aged 75- 85 years. MEASUREMENTS: Nutrition risk was assessed using a validated questionnaire, Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, Version II (SCREEN II). A Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) was used to determine level of physical activity. Markers of body composition, grip strength and fasting blood samples were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of participants were at high nutrition risk (SCREEN II score < 50; range 29-58; out of maximum score 64). The mean score for SCREEN II was higher for older people who lived with others (50.3 ± 5.1) compared to those who lived alone (46.4 ± 5.8) p=0.001. The SCREEN II score was positively correlated with the total PASE score r= 0.20 (p=0.042), grip strength r=0.20 (p=0.041), and muscle mass percentage r=0.31 (p=0.004). Lower levels of haemoglobin, serum zinc and physical activity were associated with higher nutrition risk. CONCLUSION: Half the participants were at high nutrition risk. They tended to be widowed or live alone and had lower levels of haemoglobin and serum zinc. Those at lower nutrition risk had greater muscle mass and strength, lower body fat, consumed alcohol more frequently and engaged in more physical activity. Strategies which encourage older people to eat meals and be physically active with others may assist to improve their health.

An association between ethnicity and cardiovascular outcomes for people with Type 2 diabetes in New Zealand.

AIMS: To investigate the association between ethnicity and risk of first cardiovascular (CV) event for people with Type 2 diabetes in New Zealand. METHODS: A prospective cohort study using routinely collected data from a national primary health care diabetes annual review programme linked to national hospital admission and mortality data. Ethnicity was recorded as European, Maori, Pacific, Indo-Asian, East-Asian or Other. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with first CV event. Data was collected from 48,444 patients with Type 2 diabetes, with first data collected between 1 January 2000 and 20 December 2005, no previous cardiovascular event at entry and with complete measurements. Risk factors included ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, body mass index, smoking, age at diagnosis, duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, serum lipids, glycated haemoglobin and urine albumin : creatinine ratio. The main outcome measures were time to first fatal or non-fatal CV event. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.4 years. Using combined European and Other ethnicities as a reference, hazard ratios for first CV event were 1.30 for Maori (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41), 1.04 for Pacific (0.95-1.13), 1.06 for Indo-Asian (0.91-1.24) and 0.73 for East-Asian (0.62-0.85) after controlling for all other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity was independently associated with time to first CV event in people with Type 2 diabetes. Maori were at 30% higher risk of first CV event and East-Asian 27% lower risk compared with European/Other, with no significant difference in risk for Pacific and Indo-Asian peoples.

Reducing hazard related falls in people 75 years and older with significant visual impairment: how did a successful program work?

BACKGROUND: In a randomized controlled trial testing a home safety program designed to prevent falls in older people with severe visual impairment, it was shown that the program, delivered by an experienced occupational therapist, significantly reduced the numbers of falls both at home and away from home. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the success of the home safety assessment and modification intervention in reducing falls resulted directly from modification of home hazards or from behavioral modifications, or both. METHODS: Participants were 391 community living women and men aged 75 years and older with visual acuity 6/24 meters or worse; 92% (361 of 391) completed one year of follow up. Main outcome measures were type and number of hazards and risky behavior identified in the home and garden of those receiving the home safety program, compliance with home safety recommendations reported at six months, location of all falls for all study participants during the trial, and environmental hazards associated with each fall. RESULTS: The numbers of falls at home related to an environmental hazard and those with no hazard involved were both reduced by the home safety program (n = 100 participants) compared with the group receiving social visits (n = 96) (incidence rate ratios = 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.74) and 0.43 (0.21 to 0.90), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The overall reduction in falls by the home safety program must result from some mechanism in addition to the removal or modification of hazards or provision of new equipment.

Does reported health promotion activity neglect people with ill-health?

Considering health as an alternative to ill-health ignores the multidimensionality of both concepts and invites neglect of health promotion as a multidimensional activity in persons with known ill-health. Drawing on the Ottawa Charter and Mäori perspectives of health, we interpret (ill) health according to people's ability to function in their environment by developing physical, psychological, social and spiritual resources for living. We use this framework to test empirically our hypothesis that although the concept of health promotion has always included people with ill-health, the practice of health promotion has continued to neglect them. Our exploratory review of articles published during 1989-99 and indexed on three electronic databases suggests widespread omission of people with ill-health from research on interventions for health promotion. Of 881 citations, approximately three-quarters included people without ill-health in any dimension. This finding could reflect a failure to include these people in health promotion, to describe activity to improve their health as health promotion, or both. Supporting the latter interpretation is uncertainty over the meaning of health, and the targeting of health promotion at groups at high risk of ill-health and 'all' persons. We need therefore to enable health promotion activity to include ill people explicitly.

Health promotion and older people: the role of the general practitioner in Australia in promoting healthy ageing.

OBJECTIVE: The Commonwealth Government's Enhanced Primary Care initiative supports measures to enhance the role of general practitioners (GPs) in promoting healthy ageing as part of a population health approach. This paper comments on how the health assessments can be conducted to best effect, to strengthen the role of GPs in primary care and to promote autonomy and independence in older people. METHOD: The relevant literature was collated to produce a review of public health and health promotion approaches and to ascertain the effectiveness of health promotion interventions for older people. A broad definition of health promotion including primary, secondary and tertiary prevention was adopted. RESULTS: The evidence base suggests there is scope for greater targeting of health promotion activities towards older people. The rationale for the Australian GP to assume a major health promotion role with their older patients is provided. Associated barriers and enablers are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of disability is a key public health issue. The new MBS items may enable systematic evaluation of function and assist healthy ageing for all older people, including the frail aged. An increase in the preventive advice given to older patients has the potential to increase healthy behaviours and alter health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: The annual health assessment items on the Medicare Benefits Schedule, by enabling the GP to focus on prevention and coordination of care, have the potential to improve the health, physical, psychological and social function of older Australians.

Improving the health behaviours of elderly people: randomised controlled trial of a general practice education programme.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the effect of an educational intervention for general practitioners on the health behaviours and wellbeing of elderly patients. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with 1 year follow up. SETTING: Metropolitan general practices in Melbourne, Australia. SUBJECTS: 42 general practitioners and 267 of their patients aged over 65 years. INTERVENTION: Educational and clinical practice audit programme for general practitioners on health promotion for elderly people. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' physical activity, functional status, self rated health, immunisation status, social contacts, psychological wellbeing, drug usage, and rate of influenza vaccination. Primary efficacy variables were changes in outcome measures over 1 year period. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group had increased (a) walking by an average of 88 minutes per fortnight, (b) frequency of pleasurable activities, and (c) self rated health compared with the control group. No change was seen in drug usage, rate of influenza vaccination, functional status, or psychological wellbeing as a result of the intervention. Extrapolations of the known effect of these changes in behaviour suggest mortality could be reduced by 22% if activity was sustained for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Education of the general practitioners had a positive effect on health outcomes of their elderly patients. General practitioners may have considerable public health impact in promotion of health for elderly patients.

Health promotion and older people: a qualitative study of general practitioners' views.

OBJECTIVES: To explore general practitioners' (GPs') beliefs about health promotion for older people and attitudes towards educational strategies likely to improve practice in this area. DESIGN AND SETTING: Four discussion groups, each lasting one and a half hours, completed in Melbourne, Australia in August and September 1995. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed for major themes. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 20 GPs took part; 11 university affiliates, four participant contacts and five GPs from telephone book listings. RESULTS: GPs' perceptions of their health promotion practice varied from "integrated into all medical care", to "something separate from usual practice". Positive views of older people contrasted with ageist views, with a few GPs expressing a nihilistic approach to medical care of older people. Regardless of the GPs' attitudes, lack of time and reimbursement disincentives were perceived to limit preventive practice and the potential impact of health promotion interventions. GPs felt overwhelmed with their workloads, and initial reactions to the idea of any "new" program were negative. Reactions to educational strategies varied, with choice and relevance to ease of practice being important for GP participation. CONCLUSIONS: GPs differ in their views of health promotion and in their approaches to its delivery for older people. Educational programs are often viewed negatively, but if they offer the opportunity to save time, increased participation may be more likely.

Prospective versus retrospective methods of identifying patients with delirium.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if DSM-III criteria or clinical or discharge diagnoses, reviewed retrospectively, are as accurate an indicator of the presence of delirium as prospective evaluation by a psychiatrist. DESIGN: Selection of delirious patients prospectively by a psychiatrist, followed by retrospective record review of the same patients. SETTING: A referral-based university hospital. PATIENTS: From a sample of 235 consecutive medical patients over age 70, 47 delirious patients were identified prospectively by a research psychiatrist using DSM-III criteria. The medical record of these delirious patients was reviewed after discharge for evidence of delirium. RESULTS: Four patients were assigned ICD-9 codes suggestive of delirium (sensitivity 0.09). Review of physicians' diagnoses correctly identified 8 of 47 (sensitivity 0.17) patients as being delirious or acutely confused. The specific diagnostic criteria necessary to meet a DSM-III diagnosis of delirium could be ascertained from 10 of 47 records (sensitivity 0.21). CONCLUSION: The retrospective medical record review is very imprecise in establishing the diagnosis of delirium. As research in this field moves from descriptive epidemiology to studies of pathogenesis and treatment, prospective designs will be needed.