Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 73(8): 1706-1708, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697766

RESUMEN

Imposter syndrome (IS) is an internal sensation of intellectual phoniness in persons who feel fraudulence and worthlessness. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of imposter syndrome among surgical residents. A web-based survey was conducted among all surgical residents of PGMI, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, from May 1, 2022 to May 30, 2022. Of the 156 respondents, 104 (66.7%) were males and 52 (33.3%) were females. Moderate imposterism was seen in 81(51.9%) of the respondents and 57 (36.5%) respondents reported severe or intense imposterism. Among postgraduate residents, no significant differences in Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale score by year was noted (p = 0.291). Imposter syndrome was highly prevalent among surgical residents, i.e. 138(88.5%) falling in the range of either moderate, severe, or intense imposterism. Prevalence was more among female residents as compared to male residents. Year of training didn't have any impact on the grades of imposterism.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Emociones , Accidentes por Caídas
2.
Heliyon ; 9(1): e13013, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36711320

RESUMEN

Introduction: Acute Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency encountered in emergency departments. To prevent the rate of negative appendectomies, different systems i.e. Alvarado score and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score (AIR) scores were used, but their diagnostic accuracy in Asian population is questionable. Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha (RIPASA) score has showed promising results in the recent literature. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Alvarado, AIR and RIPASA scores in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: Alvarado, AIR and RIPASA scores were prospectively applied to 132 included patients that were admitted with provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis and then their surgery was performed in General Surgery Unit, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Pakistan from 1st January 2022 to 31st July 2022. Final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology report and scores were correlated with final report. Cut off value of score >7, >5 and >7.5 were set for Alvarado, AIR and RIPASA score, respectively according to previous literature. Statistics analysis was done for all 3 scoring systems on SPSS version 23. Results: Of 132 patients, there were n = 79(59.8%) males and n = 53(40.2%) females. Mean age was 24 years (SD ± 11.6) with youngest patient of 9 years and oldest one was 70 years old. Negative Appendectomy rate was 8.3%(n = 11). RIPASA score was superior to AIR and Alvarado score in Sensitivity, NLR, Accuracy and Area under the Curve. AIR score performed better in specificity, NPV, PLR compared to RIPASA and Alvarado score. Conclusion: RIPASA score is an overall better scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis in compared to Alvarado and AIR score.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA