Management of biliary tract complications following liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A review of biliary tract complications was performed in 32 patients who underwent liver transplantation by the Western Australian Liver Transplantation Service during a 2-year period. METHODS: A review was made of patient data collected prospectively, and confirmed by retrospective casenote review. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (31 grafts) survived more than 2 days after transplantation, and of these 28 had an end-to-end biliary anastomosis. Analysis of these 28 patients found that eight of 17 patients with T-tubes had complications: three leaks at T-tube removal; two strictures and leaks; and three strictures. Six of 11 patients without a T-tube had complications: one leak; three strictures and leaks; and two strictures. Predisposing factors were present in eight of the 14 patients with biliary tract complications: hepatic artery stenosis in three; and one each with hepatic artery thrombosis; biliary calculi; donor-recipient bile duct mismatch; severe cellular rejection: and prolonged postoperative hypotension. Acute rejection, steroid-resistant rejection and cytomegalovirus infection were all significantly more common in those patients with biliary tract complications compared with those without. There was no difference in cold ischaemic time or donor age. Twelve of the 14 patients with biliary complications required endoscopic stenting with or without balloon dilation, and eight patients required radiological percutaneous drainage of bile collections. Only one patient required biliary reconstruction and two patients required re-transplantation. One patient died of uncontrolled infection. Of three patients who underwent choledochojejunostomy, biliary leak developed in two patients, both of whom required operative biliary and hepatic repair. One of the three patients died from disseminated Aspergillus infection. The median total hospital stay of patients with biliary complications was 61 days (range: 30-180 days) compared with 33.5 days (range: 22-70 days) for patients without. Of patients with end-to-end biliary anastomosis, 50% had biliary tract complications and more than half of these had predisposing factors. The majority of biliary complications were managed without the need for surgery. CONCLUSION: A total of 50% of patients with end-to-end biliary anastomosis had biliary tract complications. Biliary strictures presented later than leaks, and the majority of these complications were managed without the need for surgery.

Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: utility in clinical practice.

An accurate and functional system for grading acute liver allograft rejection is important for patient management, research, and communication. The Banff schema is a consensus document designed to provide an internationally accepted standard for this purpose. The aim of this study is to determine if application of the Banff schema would significantly alter the grading of acute liver allograft rejection compared with the Birmingham system. One hundred twenty-four post-liver transplantation biopsies performed by the Western Australian Liver Transplantation Service between 1992 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed by a pathologist and a hepatologist. Each was supplied with a brief clinical history before applying the Banff and Birmingham criteria. Results were compared with each other and to the diagnosis made at the time of the biopsy, which was based on the European grading system. Rejection was diagnosed by the reviewers in 61 of 124 biopsy specimens according to the criteria of Snover. The Banff schema and Birmingham system agreed on the grade of rejection in 22 of the 61 biopsy specimens. The Banff schema elevated the grade of rejection in 39 specimens by an increment of one. In no instance did the Banff schema reduce the grade. Comparison between the Banff schema and diagnosis made at the time of biopsy showed agreement in 39 specimens, whereas the Banff schema elevated the grade in 15 specimens and reduced the grade in 23 specimens. In comparison to the Birmingham system, the Banff schema elevated the grade of liver allograft rejection in the majority of biopsy specimens, and this has the potential to alter clinical management with the adoption of the Banff schema or if the systems are used interchangeably.

Developing visiting surgical services for rural and remote Australian communities.

The University Department of Surgery at Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre (Perth, Western Australia) has undertaken a pilot project to provide surgical services to country communities where no such service exists. Three surgeons undertake a regular schedule of appointments, and are accompanied by final-year medical students to give them experience with common conditions rarely managed in teaching hospitals. The service is supported by a central administrative office and coordinated by a general practitioner, who negotiates with the regional healthcare providers. Patients are referred by their general practitioner, who may work with the surgeon as anaesthetist or surgical assistant.