Robotic unroofing of myocardial bridge of the left anterior descending coronary artery in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and previous septal myectomy.

A 56-year-old female diagnosed with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and myocardial bridge (MB) of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery underwent septal myectomy with resolution of her left ventricular outflow tract gradient. She had ongoing refractory symptoms of exertional angina and fatigue for over a decade and finally presented to our clinic to be re-evaluated for treatment. Provocative angiographic testing confirmed significant ischemia secondary to LAD MB. She underwent robotic totally endoscopic off pump unroofing of the LAD MB with complete relief of her symptoms and return to full activity. We conclude that patients undergoing septal myectomy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy should be evaluated for MB and undergo unroofing of the bridge at the time of surgery. Learning objective: A myocardial bridge (MB) is a condition in which a coronary artery, most often the left anterior descending, takes an intramuscular route and is covered by the myocardium leading to compression and potential ischemia. This case report adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the significance of considering MB in the overall management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, and the symptomatic relief that a patient can obtain from an unroofing procedure.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.

Background: Multi-arterial grafting (MAG) with bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITAs) is superior to single internal thoracic artery (ITA) and veins, however, sternal wound infection (SWI) is a deterrent to using BITA, especially in diabetic and obese patients. Sternal-sparing approaches, including robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB), may mitigate this risk. We reviewed outcomes of robotic TECAB with BITA grafting. Methods: A total of 871 patients underwent robotic TECAB at our institution from 7/2013 to 4/2024. Of these, 406 patients received BITA grafts and are the subject of this review. Early and mid-term clinical outcomes were reviewed and angiographic patency in those undergoing hybrid revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after TECAB. All cases were performed via a beating-heart robotic approach, with standard TECAB port placement. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 67±9 years and 16% were female. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk was 1.47%±2.2%. Thirty-nine percent were diabetic (15% insulin-dependent) and 39% had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2. Twenty percent had an ejection fraction (EF) ≤40%. Ninety-eight percent of cases were completed off-pump and there were no conversions to sternotomy. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.2±0.4. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) were 1.22±0.62 and 2.44±0.83 days, respectively. Postoperative complications included atrial fibrillation in 13%, acute kidney injury (AKI) in 3.4%, return to theatre for bleeding in 0.7%, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) in 0.2%, and stroke in 0.2%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% [observed/expected (O/E): 0.89]. Return to full activities and work occurred at mean of 14±8.6 and 17±13 days, respectively. Two hundred and two patients (50%) had 'advanced' hybrid revascularization (with at least two arterial grafts and stents). ITA early graft patency in this cohort of patients was 271/278 (98%) with 100% left ITA to left anterior descending artery (LITA-LAD) patency. Mid-term follow-up was complete in all patients at mean of 51±36 months (longest follow-up at 10 years). All-cause mortality was 13% and cardiac-mortality was 2.5%. Freedom from angina was 96%, and freedom from repeat revascularization was 94%. Conclusions: Use of the beating-heart robotic TECAB approach facilitates BITA grafting to achieve multi-vessel arterial revascularization of the left coronary system, with excellent 10-year outcomes.

A decade of robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass (TECAB) at a single institution: Outcomes with 10-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass (TECAB) is performed using single or bilateral internal thoracic arteries with good results. Despite slow adoption and limited industry support, we have evolved our practice and continue to routinely perform TECAB. We describe our series of 874 patients undergoing robotic beating-heart TECAB with up to 10-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients (n = 874) undergoing robotic beating-heart TECAB (July 2013 to April 2024) was performed. Patients were contacted for midterm follow-up, and angiographic data were collected in those undergoing hybrid revascularization. Multivariate regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to analyze risk factors for early/midterm outcomes. Primary end points were midterm all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 1.5 ± 2.2%. In total, 470 (54%) underwent multivessel TECAB, of whom 86% received bilateral internal thoracic arteries. There was 1 intraoperative conversion (0.11%). Mean length of stay was 2.3 ± 0.8 days. Hospital mortality was 0.80% (observed/expected 0.54). A total of 393 patients (45%) underwent hybrid revascularization. Early graft patency was 97% (left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery patency 98%). Midterm follow-up was 100% at mean 48 months (longest 10.6 years). Cardiac-related mortality and all-cause mortality were 2.2% and 18%, respectively. Freedom from major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events was 93%. In multivariate analysis, left-main disease ≥70% was a risk factor for midterm cardiac mortality (odds ratio, 6.7; confidence interval, 1.9-24, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of 874 patients with up to 10-year follow-up, we show that robotic TECAB can be performed with excellent early and midterm results using an iterative approach, despite significant challenges. Further industry support and wider surgeon adoption are necessary to ensure sustainability of this procedure.

550 Robotic Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgeries within a Comprehensive Robotic Cardiac Program.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, we initiated a comprehensive multi-spectrum robotic cardiac surgery program with emphasis on the totally-endoscopic approach. We reviewed the outcomes of mitral valve (MV) procedures within this context. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1714 robotic endoscopic cardiac surgeries performed at our institution between September 2013 and February 2024 was conducted. Of these, outcomes of 550 consecutive heterogenous patients undergoing robotic totally-endoscopic MV operations were analyzed. Data were collected according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) definitions. RESULTS: The mean age was 63 years and 217 patients (39%) were female. The mean STS risk of mortality was 2.1% [range 0.15-19.4]. MV repair occurred in 98% of patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Concomitant procedures included: Cox-maze cryo-ablation in 127 (23%) patients; tricuspid valve repair in 54 (9.8%); septal myectomy in 15 (2.7%), totally endoscopic coronary bypass in 6 (1.1%) and aortic valve replacement in 3 (0.5%). Endo-aortic balloon occlusion was used in 392 patients (71%), ventricular fibrillatory arrest in 114 (21%) and trans-thoracic aortic clamp in 44 (8%). Observed-to-expected thirty-day mortality was 0.6. Mean length of hospital stay was 2.8 days. MV repair 30-day surgical success was 95.9% and procedural success was 93.0%. Post-operative echo revealed trace/no residual MR in 95% and mild residual MR in 5%. Five-year freedom from re-operation for recurrent MR was 95.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic endoscopic MV surgery is feasible within the context of a comprehensive multi-spectrum robotic cardiac surgery program.

Robotic Beating-Heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass: Impact of Chest Wall Dimensions in Single and Multivessel Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: There can be anatomical constraints on patient selection for minimally invasive surgery. For example, robot-assisted coronary artery bypass was reported to be more challenging when patients had a cardiothoracic ratio >50% and a sternum-vertebra anteroposterior and transverse diameter ratio <0.45. We sought to examine the impact of chest wall anatomic parameters on surgical outcomes in our totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent robotic TECAB, all of whom had a preoperative chest radiograph at our institution from July 2017 to October 2021. The cohort was divided into 2 groups, which were patients undergoing single-vessel grafting using the left internal thoracic artery (ITA; group 1) and patients undergoing multivessel grafting with bilateral ITA grafts (group 2). We measured several anatomical parameters from the preoperative chest radiograph. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients undergoing TECAB were retrospectively analyzed. After exclusions, 193 were included in this study. In group 1 (n = 91), no parameters correlated with operative time. In group 2 (n = 102), a significant negative correlation was observed between operative time and the sternum-vertebrae anteroposterior diameter (rs = -0.228, P = 0.022) and lung anteroposterior diameter (rs = -0.246, P = 0.013). To confirm these results in group 2, a propensity-matched analysis was performed and showed a statistically significant difference in surgical time based on chest anteroposterior diameters. CONCLUSIONS: In single-vessel robotic TECAB, chest wall anatomic dimensions measured on chest radiograph did not affect operative time. In multivessel cases with bilateral ITA grafts, larger anteroposterior diameter correlated with shorter operative times.

Routine External Iliac Artery Cannulation in Robotic Cardiac Surgery: Role of the Corona "Vitae" in Distal Limb Perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: Femoral artery cannulation is the most commonly used approach for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in robotic cardiac procedures. However, without adding a distal perfusion cannula, leg ischemia can occur in up to 11.5% of patients. There is a well-described 2 to 4 mm size arterial branch that originates from the medial side of the external iliac artery or inferior epigastric artery, immediately above the inguinal ligament, and connects to the obturator artery. Therefore, it was historically named the corona mortis, which means "crown of death" in Latin. When peripheral cannulation is performed above this branch in the external iliac artery, we consider it a corona "vitae" because of its role as a limb-saving collateral. We report herein our standard technique of peripheral cannulation without the need of a distal perfusion cannula and preventing limb ischemia. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent robotic cardiac surgery with peripheral cannulation over a 16-month period at our institution. We cannulated just above the level of the inguinal ligament through a 2 to 3 cm transverse skin incision. The incidence of limb ischemia and vascular complications was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 133 patients underwent robotic cardiac procedures with peripheral "external iliac" CPB. The size of the cannula was 21F or larger in 73% and 23F in 54% of the patients. No leg ischemia or femoral artery complications requiring additional intervention occurred. CONCLUSIONS: External iliac cannulation can be successfully performed in robot-assisted cardiac surgery using relatively large cannulas without the need of a distal limb perfusion catheter, with good results. In our view, given the importance of the corona mortis ("crown of death" in Latin) in perfusing the limb during CPB, we propose a new name for this artery in robotic cardiac surgery, namely, the corona vitae ("crown of life" in Latin).

Minimally invasive multivessel coronary grafting using a robotic totally endoscopic approach.

Totally endoscopic multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting is an advanced surgical technique that offers the least-invasive alternative to traditional sternotomy bypass surgery. Although robotic-assisted minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery bypass has been adopted widely, the application of a robotic totally endoscopic approach for multi-vessel bypass still remains limited. This case report demonstrates the surgical technique of robotic totally endoscopic multi-vessel coronary artery bypass using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.

Inexpensive and Easy to Set Up Robotic Cardiac Simulator Offers "Unlimited" Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Experience: Proof of Concept.

OBJECTIVE: Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) grafting is the least invasive form of coronary bypass surgery. However, despite its advantages, this approach has not gained widespread adoption. One possible reason is the advanced and complex robotic skills required to execute a totally endoscopic sutured coronary anastomosis. We prepared a novel, inexpensive, easy to set up robotic TECAB simulator. METHODS: A pig heart was placed in a cardboard box, and 3 holes were made on the side to mimic the exposure and surgical ergonomics of TECAB port placement. Four robotic ports were placed and docked to the da Vinci Si robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Monofilament 7:0 suture (7 cm long) was used to perform the anastomosis to the left anterior descending artery using remnant conduit. Seven cardiac surgeons of various training levels participated and were asked to fill out a 10-point questionnaire. RESULTS: The cost of the simulator totaled $20 per session, with 20 min to assemble. Each session allowed each trainee to practice 3 to 4 coronary anastomoses. Three cardiac surgeons completed the survey and strongly agreed that the model was easy to set up, the anastomotic exercise was realistic, and that this practice helped them gain confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our TECAB simulator is inexpensive, easy to set up, and allows trainees to practice endoscopic coronary suturing. We believe this to be a valuable training tool to learn how to do TECAB for established surgeons and that such a simulator may be of great value to cardiothoracic training programs and their trainees. Further studies are warranted.

Sternal-Sparing Surgical Options in Combined Aortic Valve and Coronary Artery Disease: Proof of Concept.

OBJECTIVE: The standard management of concomitant aortic valve (AV) and coronary artery disease has been coronary artery bypass and AV replacement (AVR). With the advent of minimally invasive options, many isolated lesions have been successfully managed using a sternal-sparing approach. In our institution, patients with isolated AV disease are offered minimally invasive surgical or transcatheter AVR, and those with isolated coronary artery disease are routinely managed with robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention. Various combinations of these techniques can be used when a sternal-sparing posture is desired because of patient risk or preference. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes in patients with combined AV and coronary disease who were managed using sternal-sparing approaches. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 10 patients in our minimally invasive surgical database who presented with concomitant AV and coronary artery disease and underwent combined sternal-sparing management of these 2 lesions using various combinations of minimally invasive approaches. RESULTS: Four patients had totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass and minimally invasive AVR at the same time, 2 patients underwent transcatheter AVR followed by totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, and 4 patients underwent minimally invasive AVR with percutaneous coronary intervention. There was no 30-day mortality. The duration of postoperative surgical hospital stay was 3.1 ± 0.9 days. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal-sparing approaches in combined AV and coronary artery disease are feasible with patient-specific treatment selection of minimally invasive techniques.

Cost and Clinical Outcomes Evaluation Between the Endoaortic Balloon and External Aortic Clamp in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Endoaortic balloon occlusion facilitates cardioplegic arrest during minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Studies have shown endoclamping to be as safe as traditional aortic clamping. We compared outcomes and hospital costs of endoclamping versus external aortic occlusion in a large administrative database. METHODS: There were 52,882 adults undergoing eligible cardiac surgery (October 2015 to March 2020) identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Endoclamp procedures (n = 419) were 1:3 propensity score matched to similar procedures using external aortic occlusion (n = 1,244). Generalized linear modeling measured differences in in-hospital complications (major adverse renal and cardiac events, including mortality, new-onset atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury [AKI], myocardial infarction [MI], postcardiotomy syndrome, stroke/transient ischemic attack [TIA], and aortic dissection) and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The mean age was 63 years, and 53% were male (n = 882). The majority (93%, n = 1,543) were mitral valve procedures, and 17% of procedures (n = 285) were robot-assisted. Total hospitalization costs were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups ($52,158 vs $49,839, P = 0.06). The median LOS was significantly shorter in the endoclamp group (incident rate ratio = 0.87, P < 0.001). Mortality, atrial fibrillation, AKI, and stroke/TIA were similar between the 2 groups. MI and postcardiotomy syndrome were lower in the endoclamp group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.14, P = 0.006, and OR = 0.27, P = 0.005). There were no aortic dissections in the endoclamp group. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic endoclamping in MIS was associated with similar costs, shorter LOS, no dissections, and comparably low mortality and stroke rates when compared with external clamping in this hospital billing dataset. These results demonstrate the clinical safety and efficacy of endoaortic balloon clamping in a real-world setting. Further studies are warranted.

Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass to the Left Anterior Descending Artery: Left Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts.

INTRODUCTION: The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) is most commonly used to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) given its well-established mortality benefit. In some cases, the grafting strategy necessitates placing the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) on the LAD. We compared outcomes in our robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass surgery (TECAB) population between patients receiving LITA versus RITA-LAD grafts. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing robotic TECAB with skeletonized ITA conduits over 9 y. Outcomes were compared between those receiving LITA (Group-1) versus RITA (Group-2) grafts to the LAD (with/without other grafts). End points were early angiographic patency (in patients undergoing hybrid revascularization) and mid-term mortality/major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events. A propensity matched subanalysis was performed comparing only patients who received bilateral ITA grafting in each group. RESULTS: Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted mortality risk score was higher in Group-2. Group-1 patients had lower incidence of multivessel disease (75% versus 96%, P ≤ 0.001). Early overall graft patency (97% versus 96%, P = 0.718) and LAD graft patency (98% versus 95%, P = 0.372) were equivalent. At mean 42-mo follow-up (longest 8.5 y), Group-1 had lower all-cause mortality but no difference in cardiac mortality or repeat revascularization. In the propensity matched subanalysis, mid-term outcomes were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Grafting the LAD with the LITA or RITA during robotic beating-heart TECAB resulted in similar early outcomes and angiographic patency. RITA-LAD patients were more likely to have multivessel disease and higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk and had higher all-cause mortality at mid-term analysis but no difference in major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events, including cardiac mortality.

Robotic endoscopic transmitral septal myectomy and concomitant mitral valve repair for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is a disease of the heart in which the patient develops left ventricular outflow tract obstruction due to the interaction of the mitral valve and the intraventricular septum. Although septal myectomy remains the gold standard treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, several other approaches have been described in the literature, such as a transaortic, transapical or transmitral approach via a sternotomy. All of these approaches have been shown to produce reliable reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradients. Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery has recently become a safe and effective alternative approach to a sternotomy for several intracardiac procedures, especially mitral valve repair and, in experienced centres, septal myectomy.

Pulmonary Artery Dual-Lumen Cannulation Versus Two Cannula Percutaneous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Configuration in Right Ventricular Failure.

Refractory right ventricular failure has significant morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is indicated when medical interventions are deemed ineffective. However, it is still being determined if one configuration is better. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience comparing the peripheral veno-pulmonary artery (V-PA) configuration versus the dual-lumen cannula with the tip in the pulmonary artery (C-PA). The analysis of a cohort of 24 patients (12 patients in each group). There was no difference in survival after hospital discharge (58.3% in the C-PA group compared to 41.7% in the V-PA group, p = 0.4). Among the C-PA group, there was a statistically significant shorter ICU length of stay (23.5 days [interquartile range {IQR} = 19-38.5] vs. 43 days [IQR = 30-50], p = 0.043) and duration of mechanical ventilation (7.5 days [IQR = 4.5-9.5] compared to (16.5 days [IQR = 9.5-22.5], p = 0.006) in the V-PA group. In the C-PA group, there were lower incidents of bleeding (33.33% vs. 83.33%, p =0.036) and combined ischemic events (0 vs. 41.67%, p = 0.037). In our single-center experience, the C-PA configuration might have a better outcome than the V-PA one. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Postoperative Day 1 Discharge After Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass: The Ultimate in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are being recognized in multiple surgical specialties, including following coronary bypass surgery to improve quality of care and decrease costs. We developed a fast-track discharge protocol for patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic coronary bypass surgery (TECAB) to be discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1, the subjects of this study. METHODS: In a retrospective study of 720 patients undergoing robotic beating-heart TECAB over 8 years at our institution, 93 patients were selected for a fast-track POD1 discharge protocol. We compared the outcomes of this group to the remaining 627 patients who were discharged per standard protocol (non-POD1 discharge). RESULTS: The early discharge group was significantly younger, had lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk of mortality, and had a lower prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Patients discharged on POD1 were more often extubated in the operating room (56% vs 42%, P = 0.010). The readmission rate for the early discharge group was 3.2%, which was similar to the readmission rate of 6.7% for the standard discharge protocol group (P = 0.329). Time to return to work was shorter in the early discharge group, although it did not quite reach statistical significance (12 vs 18 days, P = 0.051). There was no difference in midterm cardiac mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge on POD1 after robotic TECAB is appropriate in selected patients and is associated with low readmission rates and a trend towards earlier return to work. Patients suitable for this "ultrafast-track" approach were more likely to be younger, have lower STS risk, and fewer comorbidities.