Building on Strengths: An Affirmational and Systems-Level Approach to Revisiting Character in Medicine.

ABSTRACT: Although U.S. medical education has continued to place increased emphasis on defining competency standards and ensuring accountability to the public, health care inequities have persisted, several basic health outcomes have worsened, public trust in the health care system has eroded, and moral distress, burnout, and attrition among practicing physicians have escalated. These opposing trends beg the question of how the "good doctor" concept may be strengthened. In this perspective, the authors argue that revisiting the construct of physician character from an affirmational perspective could meaningfully improve medical education's impact on overall health by more holistically conceptualizing what-and who-a good doctor is. The authors introduce positive psychology's framework of character strengths, probe the distinction between character strengths and medical professionalism, and summarize the role of character strengths in promoting physician engagement and well-being in health care work. They contend that a systems-level approach to cultivating character strengths will foster physician moral agency and well-being and, by extension, transformational change in health care. Consistent with best practice in modern character education, the authors propose that institutions mindfully cultivate moral community among all stakeholders (students, faculty, staff, postgraduate trainees, and patients) and that moral community interaction centers on each member's personal aspirations with respect to living a good life, guided by the character strengths framework and informed by patient perspectives.

Discovering social learning ecosystems during clinical clerkship from United States medical students' feedback encounters: a content analysis.

PURPOSE: We examined United States medical students' self-reported feedback encounters during clerkship training to better understand in situ feedback practices. Specifically, we asked: Who do students receive feedback from, about what, when, where, and how do they use it? We explored whether curricular expectations for preceptors' written commentary aligned with feedback as it occurs naturalistically in the workplace. METHODS: This study occurred from July 2021 to February 2022 at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. We used qualitative survey-based experience sampling to gather students' accounts of their feedback encounters in 8 core specialties. We analyzed the who, what, when, where, and why of 267 feedback encounters reported by 11 clerkship students over 30 weeks. Code frequencies were mapped qualitatively to explore patterns in feedback encounters. RESULTS: Clerkship feedback occurs in patterns apparently related to the nature of clinical work in each specialty. These patterns may be attributable to each specialty's "social learning ecosystem"­the distinctive learning environment shaped by the social and material aspects of a given specialty's work, which determine who preceptors are, what students do with preceptors, and what skills or attributes matter enough to preceptors to comment on. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive, standardized expectations for written feedback across specialties conflict with the reality of workplace-based learning. Preceptors may be better able­and more motivated­to document student performance that occurs as a natural part of everyday work. Nurturing social learning ecosystems could facilitate workplace-based learning such that, across specialties, students acquire a comprehensive clinical skillset appropriate for graduation.

On pandemics and pivots: a COVID-19 reflection on envisioning the future of medical education.

The required adjustments precipitated by the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis have been challenging, but also represent a critical opportunity for the evolution and potential disruptive and constructive change of medical education. Given that the format of medical education is not fixed, but malleable and in fact must be adaptable to societal needs through ongoing reflexivity, we find ourselves in a potentially transformative learning phase for the field. An Association for Medical Education in Europe ASPIRE Academy group of 18 medical educators from seven countries was formed to consider this opportunity, and identified critical questions for collective reflection on current medical education practices and assumptions, with the attendant challenge to envision the future of medical education. This was achieved through online discussion as well as asynchronous collective reflections by group members. Four major themes and related conclusions arose from this conversation: Why we teach: the humanitarian mission of medicine should be reinforced; what we teach: disaster management, social accountability and embracing an environment of complexity and uncertainty should be the core; how we teach: open pathways to lean medical education and learning by developing learners embedded in a community context; and whom we teach: those willing to take professional responsibility. These collective reflections provide neither fully matured digests of the challenges of our field, nor comprehensive solutions; rather they are offered as a starting point for medical schools to consider as we seek to harness the learning opportunities stimulated by the pandemic.

A Proposed Blueprint for Operative Performance Training, Assessment, and Certification.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to propose an evidence-based blueprint for training, assessment, and certification of operative performance for surgical trainees. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Operative skill is a critical aspect of surgical performance. High-quality assessment of operative skill therefore has profound implications for training, accreditation, certification, and the public trust of the profession. Current methods of operative skill assessment for surgeons rely heavily on global assessment strategies across a very broad domain of procedures. There is no mechanism to assure technical competence for individual procedures. The science and scalability of operative skill assessment has progressed significantly in recent decades, and can inform a much more meaningful strategy for competency-based assessment of operative skill than has been previously achieved. METHODS: The present article reviews the current status and science of operative skill assessment and proposes a template for competency-based assessment which could be used to update training, accreditation, and certification processes. The proposal is made in reference to general surgery but is more generally applicable to other procedural specialties. RESULTS: Streamlined, routine assessment of every procedure performed by surgical trainees is feasible and would enable a more competency-based educational paradigm. In light of the constraints imposed by both clinical volume and assessment bias, trainees should be expected to become proficient and be measured against a mastery learning standard only for the most important and highest-frequency procedures. For less frequently observed procedures, performance can be compared to a norm-referenced standard and, to provide an overall trajectory of performance, analyzed in aggregate. Key factors in implementing this approach are the number of evaluations, the number of raters, the timeliness of evaluation, and evaluation items. CONCLUSIONS: A competency-based operative skill assessment can be incorporated into surgical training, assessment, and certification. The time has come to develop a systematic approach to this issue as a means of demonstrating professional standards worthy of the public trust.

Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings.

Phenomenon: Detection of visual and auditory clinical findings is part of medical students' core clinical performance abilities that a medical education curriculum should teach, assess, and remediate. However, there is a limited understanding of how students develop these skills. While training physical exam technical skills has received significant attention and emphasis, teaching and assessing medical students' ability to detect and interpret visual and auditory clinical findings skills has been less systematic. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate how medical students' visual and auditory clinical findings skills progress and develop over their four years of undergraduate medical education. This study will provide educators insights that can guide curriculum refinements that lead to improving students' abilities in this area. Approach: A computer-based progress exam was created to measure the longitudinal development of students' abilities to detect and interpret visual and auditory findings. After pilot testing, sixty test items were developed in collaboration with six clinical faculty members and two medical education researchers. The exam includes detection and description of ECG, x-ray, heart sounds, breath sounds, skin lesions, and movement findings. The exam was administered to students at the beginning of each training year since 2014. Additionally, the exam was administered to the Class of 2017 prior to their graduation. Measurement validity and reliability tests were conducted. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used to determine progress. Findings: More than 98% of students in four years of training completed the exam each year. The exam instrument had high reliabilities and demonstrated acceptable concurrent validity when compared with other academic performance data. Findings showed that students' visual and auditory clinical findings skills increased each training year until their fourth year. There was no performance improvement between incoming Year 4 students and graduating Year 4 students. While group means increased, class performance did not become more homogeneous across four years. Longitudinal data showed the same performance patterns as the cross-sectional data. Performance of the bottom quartile of graduating fourth-year students was not significantly higher than the performance of the top quartile of incoming first-year students who had not had formal medical training. Insights: A longitudinal study to follow learners' performance in detecting and interpreting visual and auditory clinical findings can provide meaningful insights regarding the effects of medical training programs on performance growth. The present study suggests that our medical curriculum is not effective in bringing all students to a higher level of performance in detecting and interpreting visual and auditory clinical findings. This study calls for further investigation how medical students can develop visual and auditory detection and interpretation skills in undergraduate medical education. There is a need for planned curriculum and assessment of medical students' skills in detecting and interpreting visual and auditory clinical findings.

Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement.

Student engagement refers to a broad range of activities where students participate in management, education, research, and community activities within their institutions. It is a mutually beneficial collaborative approach between students and their institutions. This article provides practical advice for the implementation or further development of student engagement at medical, dental, and veterinary schools. The tips provided are based on the experiences of a group of universities recently recognized for best practice in student engagement, and are supported by evidence from the literature. The tips cover overarching themes which include the creation of an institutional culture and formal framework for student engagement, and maximize communication routes between students with peers and faculty. Tips are for specific areas of active student engagement, covering curriculum design and development, peer teaching, governance processes, research activities, peer support programs, and interaction with the local community.

Getting Real: Aligning the Learning Needs of Clerkship Students With the Current Clinical Environment.

The authors present follow-up to a prior publication, which proposed a new model for third-year clerkships. The new model was created to address deficiencies in the clinical year and to rectify a recognized mismatch between students' learning needs and the realities of today's clinical settings. The new curricular model was implemented at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in academic year 2016-2017. Guiding principles were developed. These were to more deeply engage students in experiential learning through clinical immersion; to pair individual faculty with individual students over longer periods of time so real trust could be developed; to provide students with longitudinal clinical reasoning education under controlled instructional conditions; to simplify goals and objectives for the core clerkships and align them with student learning needs; and to provide students with individualized activities to help them explore areas of interest, choose their specialty, and improve areas of clinical weakness before the fourth year. The authors discuss reactions by faculty and students to the new curriculum, which were mostly positive, as well as several outcomes. Students showed very different attitudes toward what they defined as success in the clerkship year, reflective of their deeper immersion. Students spent more time working in clinical settings and performed more procedures. Performance on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge and Clinical Skills was unchanged from traditional clerkship years. The 2015 article called for rethinking the third-year clerkships. The authors have shown that such change is possible, and the new curriculum can be implemented with successful early outcomes.

The journeys of three ASPIRE winning medical schools toward excellence in student assessment.

Introduction: ASPIRE Excellence Awards in Student Assessment are offered to medical schools with innovative and comprehensive assessment programmes adjudged by international experts, using evidence-based criteria. The journeys of three ASPIRE-winning medical schools toward "assessment excellence" are presented. These schools include Aga Khan University Medical College (AKU-MC), Pakistan, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIUSOM), USA, and University of Leeds School of Medicine, UK. Methods: The unfolding journeys highlighting achievements, innovations, and essential components of each assessment programme were compared to identify differences and commonalities. Results: Cultural contextual differences included developed-versus-developing country, east-west, type of regulatory bodies, and institutional-versus-national certifying/licensing examinations, which influence curricula and assessments. In all, 12 essential commonalities were found: alignment with institutional vision; sustained assessment leadership; stakeholder engagement; communication between curriculum and assessment; assessment-for-learning and feedback; longitudinal student profiling of outcome achievement; assessment rigor and robustness; 360° feedback from-and-to assessment; continuous enrichment through rigorous quality assurance; societal sensitivity; influencing others; and a "wow factor." Conclusions: Although the journeys of the three medical schools were undertaken in different cultural contexts, similar core components highlight strong foundations in student assessment. The journeys continue as assessment programmes remain dynamic and measurement science expands. This article may be helpful to other institutions pursuing excellence in assessment.

The ASPIRE-to-Excellence Program: A Global Effort to Improve the Quality of Medical Education.

Publications and organizations ranking medical schools rely heavily on schools' research-oriented and grant-success data because those are the publicly available data. To address the vacuum of evidence for medical education quality, in 2012 the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) introduced an initiative entitled A Schools Programme for International Recognition of Excellence in Education (ASPIRE) awards. ASPIRE panels of international experts in specific areas of medical education have developed internationally peer-based criteria to benchmark excellence in social accountability, student engagement, student assessment, faculty development, and simulation; they plan to publish criteria on curriculum design and development in 2018. Schools are encouraged to use ASPIRE criteria to challenge themselves and, for a fee, may submit evidence that they have met the criteria for excellence in one or more of the five areas. The international panels then judge the evidence submitted by the school and determine whether an award of excellence is merited.The authors share lessons learned from five years of program experience. Of the 88 schools submitting evidence, 38 have been recognized for their excellence in one of the ASPIRE topic areas. As the number of representatives from the schools that are awarded ASPIRE recognition continues to increase and those individuals find new ways to contribute, hopes are high for this program. Challenges remain in how to better define excellence in low-resources settings, what new areas to take on, and how to keep infrastructure costs down. However, as an example of continuing global interaction for quality improvement, optimism prevails.

ASPIRE-ing to Excellence at SIUSOM.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. This Personal View article describes the experience of Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIUSOM) with the AMEE School Programme for International Recognition of Excellence in Education (ASPIRE) awards program. Institutional leaders considering applying may need something more than the program description to take the plunge. We use narrative to present our reasons for applying, how the application and review process went for us, and the benefits of getting involved. By sharing our story, we hope to motivate other educators who believe in their school's educational excellence to visualize themselves as applicants and take action.

Competencies, milestones, and EPAs - Are those who ignore the past condemned to repeat it?

BACKGROUND: The idea of competency-based education sounds great on paper. Who wouldn't argue for a standardized set of performance-based assessments to assure competency in graduating students and residents? Even so, conceptual concerns have already been raised about this new system and there is yet no evidence to refute their veracity. AIMS: We argue that practical concerns deserve equal consideration, and present evidence strongly suggesting these concerns should be taken seriously. METHOD: Specifically, we share two historical examples that illustrate what happened in two disparate contexts (K-12 education and the Department of Defense [DOD]) when competency (or outcomes-based) assessment frameworks were implemented. We then examine how observation and assessment of clinical performance stands currently in medical schools and residencies, since these methodologies will be challenged to a greater degree by expansive lists of competencies and milestones. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with suggestions as to a way forward, because clearly the assessment of competency and the ability to guarantee that graduates are ready for medical careers is of utmost importance. Hopefully the headlong rush to competencies, milestones, and core entrustable professional activities can be tempered before even more time, effort, frustration and resources are invested in an endeavor which history suggests will collapse under its own weight.

Twenty Questions game performance on medical school entrance predicts clinical performance.

CONTEXT: This study is based on the premise that the game of 'Twenty Questions' (TQ) tests the knowledge people acquire through their lives and how well they organise and store it so that they can effectively retrieve, combine and use it to address new life challenges. Therefore, performance on TQ may predict how effectively medical school applicants will organise and store knowledge they acquire during medical training to support their work as doctors. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether TQ game performance on medical school entrance predicts performance on a clinical performance examination near graduation. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal, observational study involved each medical student in one class playing a game of TQ on a non-medical topic during the first week of medical school. Near graduation, these students completed a 14-case clinical performance examination. Performance on the TQ task was compared with performance on the clinical performance examination. RESULTS: The 24 students who exhibited a logical approach to the TQ task performed better on all senior clinical performance examination measures than did the 26 students who exhibited a random approach. Approach to the task was a better predictor of senior examination diagnosis justification performance than was the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) Biological Science Test score and accounts for a substantial amount of score variation not attributable to a co-relationship with MCAT Biological Science Test performance. CONCLUSIONS: Approach to the TQ task appears to be one reasonable indicator of how students process and store knowledge acquired in their everyday lives and may be a useful predictor of how they will process the knowledge acquired during medical training. The TQ task can be fitted into one slot of a mini medical interview.

Getting Real: Embracing the Conditions of the Third-Year Clerkship and Reimagining the Curriculum to Enable Deliberate Practice.

There are many calls in the literature for changes in how medical students are educated. Although many curricular innovations have been attempted, a look at the theory behind how complex skills are learned provides useful information to guide new curriculum developments. The requirement of deliberate practice as the road map for success in the learning of clinical skills suggests that perhaps the current clinical milieu is not an optimal place for medical students to learn. The idiosyncrasy inherent in the dramatically changed medical landscape of the last 20 years makes it difficult for such practice to occur; the apprentice model of legitimate peripheral participation in a community of practice as it used to exist does no longer. Indeed, current workplace environments are at odds with the needs of medical students. Overwhelming numbers of goals and objectives in existing third-year clerkships serve as wish lists of what students should learn. They should be replaced by a systematic, longitudinal curriculum in which all students can be guaranteed to have encountered the core clinical competencies as defined. Moving the goals and objectives of the current clerkships to a longitudinal, spiral curricular format frees up clinical time in the third year to be used for students to find their future specialty and socialize into medicine. Doing so allows for an opportunity for students to spend extended time in areas of their interest. Moving to such a new curriculum format maximizes and optimizes learning while embracing the reality of current clinical workplace environments.

Placing constraints on the use of the ACGME milestones: a commentary on the limitations of global performance ratings.

As part of the outcomes-based accreditation process, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) now requires that medical specialties formulate and use educational milestones to assess residents' performance. These milestones are specialty-specific achievements that residents are expected to demonstrate at established intervals in their training. In this Commentary, the authors argue that the pressure to efficiently use program directors' and faculty members' time, particularly in the increasingly clinical-revenue-dependent model of the academic medical center, will lead program directors to meet these new accreditation expectations solely by adding items that assess these competencies to global end-of-rotation rating forms. This approach will increase the workload of faculty but will not provide new and useful information about residents' competence. These same concerns could apply if assessment committees attempt to measure these new performance dimensions without using direct observation to evaluate residents' performance. In these circumstances, the milestones movement will fall short of its intention and potential. In this Commentary, the authors outline and provide evidence from the literature for their concerns. They discuss the role that human judges play in measuring performance, the measurement characteristics of global performance ratings, and the problems associated with simply adding items to existing global rating forms.

Variations in senior medical student diagnostic justification ability.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic justification proficiency of senior medical students across a broad spectrum of cases with common chief complaints and diagnoses. METHOD: The authors gathered diagnostic justification exercise data from the Senior Clinical Comprehensive Examination taken by Southern Illinois University School of Medicine's students from the classes of 2011 (n = 67), 2012 (n = 66), and 2013 (n = 79). After interviewing and examining standardized patients, students listed their key findings and diagnostic possibilities considered, and provided a written explanation of how they used key findings to move from their initial differential diagnoses to their final diagnosis. Two physician judges blindly rated responses. RESULTS: Student diagnostic justification performance was highly variable from case to case and often rated below expectations. Of the students in the classes of 2011, 2012, and 2013, 57% (38/67), 23% (15/66), and 33% (26/79) were judged borderline or poor on diagnostic justification performance for more than 50% of the cases on the examination. CONCLUSIONS: Student diagnostic justification performance was inconsistent across the range of cases, common chief complaints, and underlying diagnoses used in this study. More than 20% of students exhibited borderline or poor diagnostic justification performance on more than 50% of the cases. If these results are confirmed in other medical schools, attention needs to be directed to investigating new curricular methods that ensure deliberate practice of these competencies across the spectrum of common chief complaints and diagnoses and do not depend on the available mix of patients.

Patient safety education: what was, what is, and what will be?

Patient safety is an important topic that has been receiving more attention in the current health care climate. Patient safety as a curriculum topic in medical schools has only become apparent in the late 1990 s, and much more needs to be done. This article summarizes patient safety curricular content as it occurred (or did not occur) in medical education circles in the past (pre-1990 s), and present. It also makes some recommendations for the future of medical education curricula in the area of patient safety, using a framework for the development of expertise using the Dreyfus educational model.

Biomedical knowledge, clinical cognition and diagnostic justification: a structural equation model.

CONTEXT: The process whereby medical students employ integrated analytic and non-analytic diagnostic strategies is not fully understood. Analysing academic performance data could provide a perspective complementary to that of laboratory experiments when investigating the nature of diagnostic strategy. This study examined the performance data of medical students in an integrated curriculum to determine the relative contributions of biomedical knowledge and clinical pattern recognition to diagnostic strategy. METHODS: Structural equation modelling was used to examine the relationship between biomedical knowledge and clinical cognition (clinical information gathering and interpretation) assessed in Years 1 and 2 of medical school and their relative contributions to diagnostic justification assessed at the beginning of Year 4. Modelling was applied to the academic performance data of 133 medical students who received their md degrees in 2011 and 2012. RESULTS: The model satisfactorily fit the data. The correlation between biomedical knowledge and clinical cognition was low-moderate (0.26). The paths between these two constructs and diagnostic justification were moderate and slightly favoured biomedical knowledge (0.47 and 0.40 for biomedical knowledge and clinical cognition, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that within the first 2 years of medical school, students possessed separate, but complementary, cognitive tools, comprising biomedical knowledge and clinical pattern recognition, which contributed to an integrated diagnostic strategy at the beginning of Year 4. Assessing diagnostic justification, which requires students to make their thinking explicit, may promote the integration of analytic and non-analytic processing into diagnostic strategy.

The case of the entitled resident: a composite case study of a resident performance problem syndrome with interdisciplinary commentary.

BACKGROUND: Residents with performance problems create substantial burden on programs and institutions. Understanding the nature and quality of performance problems can help in learning to address performance problems. AIM: We sought to illuminate the effects of resident performance problems and the potential solutions for those problems from the perspectives of people with various roles in health care. METHODS: We created a composite portrait from several residents who demonstrated a cluster of common performance characteristics and whose chronic or serious maladaptive behavior and response to situations created problems for themselves, for their clinical colleagues, and for faculty of their residency program. The composite was derived from in-depth interviews of program directors and review of resident records. We solicited practitioners from multiple fields to respond to the portrait by answering a series of questions about severity, prognosis, and how and whether one could reliably remediate a person with these performance characteristics. We present their perspectives in a manner borrowed from the New England Journal of Medicine's "Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital." RESULTS: We created a composite portrait of a resident whose behavior suggested he felt entitled to benefits his peers were not entitled to. Experts reflecting on his behavior varied in their opinion about the effect the resident would have on the health care system. They suggested approaches to remediation that required substantial time and effort from the faculty. CONCLUSION: Programs must balance the needs of individual residents to adjust their behaviors with the needs of the health care system and other people within it.

Pursuing professional accountability: an evidence-based approach to addressing residents with behavioral problems.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based approach to the identification, prevention, and management of surgical residents with behavioral problems. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons and Southern Illinois University Department of Surgery hosted a 1-day think tank to develop strategies for early identification of problem residents and appropriate interventions. Participants read a selection of relevant literature before the meeting and reviewed case reports. SETTING: American College of Surgeons headquarters, Chicago, Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: Medical and nursing leaders in the field of resident education; individuals with expertise in dealing with academic law, mental health issues, learning deficiencies, and disruptive physicians; and surgical residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence-based strategies for the identification, prevention, and management of problem residents. RESULTS: Recommendations based on the literature and expert opinions have been made for the identification, remediation, and reassessment of problem residents. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to set clear expectations for professional behavior with faculty and residents. A notice of deficiency should define the expected acceptable behavior, timeline for improvement, and consequences for noncompliance. Faculty should note and address systems problems that unintentionally reinforce and thus enable unprofessional behavior. Complaints, particularly by new residents, should be investigated and addressed promptly through a process that is transparent, fair, and reasonable. The importance of early intervention is emphasized.