Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prim Care ; 45(2): 193-212, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29759120

RESUMEN

New and existing rheumatic disease is frequently encountered in the primary care setting. The number of medications used to treat various rheumatic conditions continues to increase. Some medications have very specific indications, whereas others have increasing off-label uses. Regardless of the indication, the medications used in rheumatology have variable dosing recommendations, significant side effects, recommended monitoring parameters, and potential medication interactions. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential uses as well as possible pitfalls associated with medications used in rheumatology.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Humanos , Reumatología
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 72(23 Suppl 3): S171-6, 2015 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26582305

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare estimated blood volume (EBV) versus weight-based (WB) dosing of unfractionated heparin in terms of safety and ability to achieve therapeutic antifactor-Xa (AF-Xa) levels. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study including 32 male veterans who received UFH. Primary outcome measures included time until therapeutic anticoagulation, number of adjustments needed to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation, median AF-Xa levels and the percentage of patients who were therapeutic after the first and second levels. Safety was determined as the incidence of major and minor bleeding. RESULTS: EBV dosing may be associated with a decrease in the average time to therapeutic range (20.4 ± 16.7 hours with EBV vs. 26.8 ± 26 hours with WB; p = 0.404) and an increase in the percentage of patients achieving therapeutic anticoagulation after the first AF-Xa level (50% with EBV vs. 35.7% with WB; p = 0.611) although these results were not statistically significant. WB dosing required fewer adjustments (2.7 ± 2.9 with WB vs. 4 ± 2.6 with EBV; p = 0.192) with more patients within the therapeutic range after the second AF-Xa level (42.9% with WB vs. 33.3% with EBV; p = 0.897). There was one major and three minor bleeds in the WB dosing group versus one minor bleed for the EBV dosing cohort (p = 0.438 and p = 0.323, respectively). CONCLUSION: EBV dosing achieved quick therapeutic anticoagulation with less bleeding compared to WB dosing in a veteran population. Due to the study's limitations, larger, randomized, comparative trials are needed to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Volumen Sanguíneo/efectos de los fármacos , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Veteranos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Coagulación Sanguínea/fisiología , Volumen Sanguíneo/fisiología , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA