Assessment of intraaxial and extraaxial brain lesions with digitized computed tomographic images versus film: ROC analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of viewing computed tomographic (CT) scans as film versus soft-copy images at a workstation. METHODS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the interpretation of 202 CT scans (103 were normal, 99 were abnormal) by five neuroradiologists was performed. Abnormal images contained high- or low-attenuation intraaxial lesions or extraaxial fluid (subdural, subarachnoid, or epidural hemorrhage). Hard copies were read on a standard light box, and digital images were examined at a 1,024 x 1,250 workstation. Lesion location and type and confidence ratings were recorded on a worksheet. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between the two display modes. Reader performance was slightly better with the workstation in the assessment of low-attenuation lesions. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy is similar for CT scans displayed at a workstation and those displayed as hard copy in the assessment of subtle intra- and extraaxial brain lesions.

Evaluation of tibial plateau fractures: efficacy of MR imaging compared with CT.

OBJECTIVE: CT is often used after plain films to evaluate fractures of the tibial plateau. Because MR imaging can show associated soft-tissue injuries as well as fractures, we hypothesize that MR is superior to CT for imaging these injuries. Accordingly, we compared the efficacy of MR imaging and CT in 22 patients with tibial plateau fractures. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: CT with two-dimensional reconstruction and MR examinations were performed in 22 patients with tibial plateau fractures. The images were interpreted by four radiologists and two orthopedic surgeons. Findings on CT scans and plain films were used to determine the configuration of the fractures and to classify them according to the Schatzker system. This was done with findings on MR images and plain films at a separate session. The MR images were also evaluated for ligamentous and meniscal injuries. A qualitative side-by-side comparison of two-dimensional CT scans and MR images for depiction of fracture configuration was done. Imaging results were correlated with observations from physical examinations in all patients and with surgical findings in 12 patients. RESULTS: All of the six types of fractures of the Schatzker classification were observed in this series. Comparison of two-dimensional CT reconstructions and MR images for depiction of fracture configuration revealed that the two techniques were equal in 14 patients, MR imaging was superior to CT in five patients, and CT was superior to MR imaging in three patients (who had very complex and comminuted fractures). In addition, MR imaging showed 12 complete ligamentous tears and 15 partial ligamentous tears in 15 (68%) of the 22 patients. MR showed meniscal injuries in 12 (55%) of the 22 patients. CONCLUSION: MR imaging was equivalent or superior to two-dimensional CT reconstruction for depiction of fracture configuration in most patients. In addition, MR showed significant soft-tissue injuries. We believe that MR imaging is the preferable imaging technique for most patients with fractures of the tibial plateau.