Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
Resusc Plus ; 18: 100599, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515443

RESUMEN

The European Trauma Course (ETC) exemplifies an innovative approach to multispecialty trauma education. This initiative was started as a collaborative effort among the European Society for Emergency Medicine, the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology under the auspices of the European Resuscitation Council. With the robust support of these societies, the project has evolved into the independent European Trauma Course Organisation. Over the past 15 years, the ETC has transcended traditional training by integrating team dynamics and non-technical skills into a scenario-based simulation course, helping to shape trauma care practice and education. A distinctive feature of the ETC is its training of doctors and allied healthcare professionals, fostering a collaborative and holistic approach to trauma care. The ETC stands out for its unique team-teaching approach, which has gained widespread recognition as the standard for in-hospital trauma care training not only in Europe but also beyond. Since its inception ETC has expanded geographically from Finland to Sudan and from Brazil to the Emirates, training nearly 20,000 healthcare professionals and shaping trauma care practice and education across 25 countries. Experiencing exponential growth, the ETC continues to evolve, reflecting its unmet demand in trauma team education. This review examines the evolution of the ETC, its innovative team-teaching methodology, national implementation strategies, current status, and future challenges. It highlights its impact on trauma care, team training, and the effect on other life support courses in various countries.

2.
Injury ; 53(10): 3070-3077, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36038387

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lightning strikes have high morbidity and mortality rates. Thousands of fatalities are estimated to be caused by lightning worldwide, with the number of injuries being 10 times greater. However, evidence of lightning injuries is restricted to case reports and series and nonsystematic reviews. In this clinical review, we systematically select, score, and present evidence regarding lightning injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search for reviews and guidelines in the PubMed, Embase (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), and Web of Science databases. All publications were scored according to the Levels of Evidence 2 Table of the Oxford center for Evidence-Based Medicine. The reviews were also scored using the scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) and guidelines from the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II). RESULTS: The search yielded 536 articles. Eventually, 56 articles were included, which consisted of 50 reviews, five guidelines and one overview. The available reviews and guidelines were graded as low to moderate evidence. Most damage from lightning injuries is cardiovascular and neurological, although an individual can experience complications with any of their vital functions. At the scene, initial treatment and resuscitation should focus on those who appear to be dead, which is called the reverse triage system. We proposed an evidence-based treatment protocol for lightning strike patients. CONCLUSION: It is vital that every lightning strike patient is treated according to standard trauma guidelines, with a specific focus on the possible sequelae of lighting injuries. All emergency healthcare professionals should acknowledge the risks and particularities of treating lighting strike injuries to optimize the care and outcomes of these patients. Our evidence-based treatment protocol should help prehospital and in-hospital emergency healthcare practitioners to prevent therapeutic mismanagement among these patients.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Acción del Rayo , Relámpago , Choque , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Traumatismos por Acción del Rayo/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Acción del Rayo/prevención & control , Resucitación/métodos , Triaje
3.
J Thorac Imaging ; 36(5): 286-293, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34081643

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) frequently develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and need invasive ventilation. The potential to reaerate consolidated lung tissue in COVID-19-related ARDS is heavily debated. This study assessed the potential to reaerate lung consolidations in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS under invasive ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19-related ARDS who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) at low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and after a recruitment maneuver at high PEEP of 20 cm H2O. Lung reaeration, volume, and weight were calculated using both CT scans. CT scans were performed after intubation and start of ventilation (early CT), or after several days of intensive care unit admission (late CT). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were analyzed. The median percentages of reaerated and nonaerated lung tissue were 19% [interquartile range, IQR: 10 to 33] and 11% [IQR: 4 to 15] for patients with early and late CT scans, respectively (P=0.049). End-expiratory lung volume showed a median increase of 663 mL [IQR: 483 to 865] and 574 mL [IQR: 292 to 670] after recruitment for patients with early and late CT scans, respectively (P=0.43). The median decrease in lung weight attributed to nonaerated lung tissue was 229 g [IQR: 165 to 376] and 171 g [IQR: 81 to 229] after recruitment for patients with early and late CT scans, respectively (P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with COVID-19-related ARDS undergoing invasive ventilation had substantial reaeration of lung consolidations after recruitment and ventilation at high PEEP. Higher PEEP can be considered in patients with reaerated lung consolidations when accompanied by improvement in compliance and gas exchange.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 35(1): 11-25, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742571

RESUMEN

Perioperative allergic reactions are rare, yet important complications of anesthesia. Severe, generalized allergic reactions called anaphylaxis are estimated to have a mortality of 3.5-4.8%. Adequate recognition and handling of a severe perioperative anaphylactic reaction result in better outcomes, including less hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and death. The diagnosis of a perioperative allergic reaction can be difficult as the list of possible culprits of a perioperative allergic reaction is extensive. Making an informed guess on the causative agent and avoiding this agent in future anesthesia procedures is undesirable and unsafe. Therefore, to ensure future patient safety, a thorough investigation following a perioperative allergic reaction is mandatory. A collaborate approach by allergists and anesthesiologists is advised. In this article, we discuss the basic approach of the allergic patient and of patients with a suspected allergy to perioperatively administered medication.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/prevención & control , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestésicos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/prevención & control , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 35(1): 67-82, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742579

RESUMEN

Airway management and ventilation are essential components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to achieve oxygen delivery in order to prevent hypoxic injury and increase the chance of survival. Weighing the relative benefits and downsides, the best approach is a staged strategy; start with a focus on high-quality chest compressions and defibrillation, then optimize mask ventilation while preparing for advanced airway management with a supraglottic airway device. Endotracheal intubation can still be indicated, but has the largest downsides of all advanced airway techniques. Whichever stage of airway management, ventilation and chest compression quality should be closely monitored. Capnography has many advantages and should be used routinely. Optimizing ventilation strategies, harmonizing ventilation with mechanical chest compression devices, and implementation in complex and stressful environments are challenges we need to face through collaborative innovation, research, and implementation.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/normas , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Respiración Artificial/normas , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/normas , Maniquíes , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Respiración Artificial/métodos
7.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 29(1): 32, 2021 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33579335

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early pre-hospital identification of critically ill patients reduces morbidity and mortality. To identify critically ill non-traumatic and non-cardiac arrest patients, a pre-hospital risk stratification tool was previously developed in the United States. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of this tool in a Dutch Emergency Department. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients of 18 years and older transported by ambulance to the Emergency Department of a tertiary referral hospital between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2017. Documentation of pre-hospital vital parameters had to be available. The tool included a full set of vital parameters, which were categorized by predetermined thresholds. Study outcome was the accuracy of the tool in predicting critical illness, defined as admittance to the Intensive Care Unit for delivery of vital organ support or death within 28 days. Accuracy of the risk stratification tool was measured with the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) curve. RESULTS: Nearly 3000 patients were included in the study, of whom 356 patients (12.2%) developed critical illness. We observed moderate discrimination of the pre-hospital risk score with an AUROC of 0.74 (95%-CI 0.71-0.77). Using a threshold of 3 to identify critical illness, we observed a sensitivity of 45.0% (95%-CI 44.8-45.2) and a specificity of 86.0% (95%-CI 85.9-86.0). CONCLUSION: These data show that this pre-hospital risk stratification tool is a moderately effective tool to predict which patients are likely to become critically ill in a Dutch non-trauma and non-cardiac arrest population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Transporte de Pacientes , Triaje , Adulto , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Pase de Guardia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
8.
Anesth Analg ; 131(4): 1060-1065, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Continuous infusions of norepinephrine to treat perioperative hypotension are typically administered through a central venous line rather than a peripheral venous catheter to avoid the risk of localized tissue necrosis in case of drug extravasation. There is limited literature to estimate the risk of skin necrosis when peripheral norepinephrine is used to counteract anesthesia-associated hypotension in elective surgical cases. This study aimed to estimate the rate of occurrence of drug-related adverse effects, including skin necrosis requiring surgical management when norepinephrine peripheral extravasation occurs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the perioperative databases of the University Hospitals in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands, to identify surgical patients who received norepinephrine peripheral intravenous infusions (20 µg/mL) between 2012 and 2016. The risk of drug-related adverse effects, including skin necrosis, was estimated. Particular care was taken to identify patients who needed plastic surgical or medical attention secondary to extravasation of dilute, peripheral norepinephrine. RESULTS: A total of 14,385 patients who received norepinephrine peripheral continuous infusions were identified. Drug extravasation was observed in 5 patients (5/14,385 = 0.035%). The 95% confidence interval (CI) for infusion extravasation was 0.011%-0.081%, indicating an estimated risk of 1-8 events per every 10,000 patients. There were zero related complications requiring surgical or medical intervention, resulting in a 95% CI of 0%-0.021% and indicating a risk of approximately 0-2 events per 10,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the current database analysis, no significant association was found between the use of peripheral intravenous norepinephrine infusions and adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Norepinefrina/efectos adversos , Periodo Perioperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Resultados Negativos , Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Piel/patología
9.
Anesthesiology ; 132(3): 461-475, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31794513

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant healthcare impact of acute kidney injury, little is known regarding prevention. Single-center data have implicated hypotension in developing postoperative acute kidney injury. The generalizability of this finding and the interaction between hypotension and baseline patient disease burden remain unknown. The authors sought to determine whether the association between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury varies by preoperative risk. METHODS: Major noncardiac surgical procedures performed on adult patients across eight hospitals between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed. Derivation and validation cohorts were used, and cases were stratified into preoperative risk quartiles based upon comorbidities and surgical procedure. After preoperative risk stratification, associations between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury were analyzed. Hypotension was defined as the lowest mean arterial pressure range achieved for more than 10 min; ranges were defined as absolute (mmHg) or relative (percentage of decrease from baseline). RESULTS: Among 138,021 cases reviewed, 12,431 (9.0%) developed postoperative acute kidney injury. Major risk factors included anemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, surgery type, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, and expected anesthesia duration. Using such factors and others for risk stratification, patients with low baseline risk demonstrated no associations between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury. Patients with medium risk demonstrated associations between severe-range intraoperative hypotension (mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg) and acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.16 in validation cohort). In patients with the highest risk, mild hypotension ranges (mean arterial pressure 55 to 59 mmHg) were associated with acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.56). Compared with absolute hypotension, relative hypotension demonstrated weak associations with acute kidney injury not replicable in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery demonstrate varying associations with distinct levels of hypotension when stratified by preoperative risk factors. Specific levels of absolute hypotension, but not relative hypotension, are an important independent risk factor for acute kidney injury.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Hipotensión/complicaciones , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/complicaciones , Presión Arterial , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Injury ; 50(12): 2167-2175, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31627899

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Emergency ultrasound methods such as Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) are a widely used imaging method. This examination can be performed to examine the presence of several life-threatening injuries. Early diagnosis may lead to better outcome, but the effect of timely diagnosis in the prehospital setting is not yet clear. Therefore, the aim is to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the effect of prehospital ultrasound performed in (poly)trauma patients. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane's Library. Articles were included if prehospital ultrasound was performed as a diagnostic intervention in patients with trauma. The main outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, changes in prehospital diagnosis/treatment, changes in destination hospital and in-hospital response. Case reports and case series were excluded. RESULTS: After screening 3343 articles, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included three retrospective and six prospective observational studies, with a total number of 2,889 patients. Five studies report at least one change in polytrauma management, ranging from 6% to 48,9% of the cases. The diagnostic accuracy of prehospital ultrasound was adequate in eight (out of nine) articles. High sensitivity and high specificity were found on several endpoints (pneumothorax, free abdominal fluid, haemoperitoneum, both on site and during transport). CONCLUSION: Prehospital ultrasound led to a change in polytrauma management in all studies that included this as an outcome measure. The diagnostic accuracy was described in eight studies, high sensitivity and specificity were found. Overall, the studies seem to suggest a positive influence of performing ultrasound. However, additional research with homogenous accuracy endpoints and uniformly trained prehospital care providers is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tiempo de Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA