Persistence and adherence with mirabegron vs antimuscarinics in overactive bladder: Retrospective analysis of a UK General Practice prescription database.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Persistence with antimuscarinic (AM) drugs prescribed for overactive bladder (OAB) is poor. This study aimed to compare persistence and adherence with the beta-3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron (MIR) vs AMs over 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis included patients aged ≥18 years who were prescribed MIR, or any AM. A 12-month look-back was used to assess inclusion eligibility. The primary end-point was persistence, defined as time to first discontinuation of index drug, during 1 year follow-up. The secondary end-point was adherence, estimated by medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 6189 patients. Those prescribed AMs were mostly treatment-naïve (range 72.9%-95.3%) vs 54.4% of MIR patients. There was greater persistence with MIR vs AM. The median number of days on therapy with MIR was 101, vs 27-56 for AMs. Patients receiving AMs were significantly more likely to discontinue than those receiving MIR (hazard ratio [HR] range 1.24-2.05, P < .01 for each AM vs MIR. In treatment-naïve patients, HRs ranged from 1.25 (solifenacin, P = .012) to 2.07 (oxybutynin IR, P < .001). In treatment-experienced patients, they ranged from 1.10 (fesoterodine, P = NS) to 2.12 (oxybutynin IR, P < .001). Adherence was greater with MIR (mean MPR 48.4%) than with AMs (range 27.6%-40.4%, P < .001). Treatment-experienced patients were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment (HR 0.87, P = .006). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: MIR was associated with a significantly longer time to discontinuation, greater persistence and better adherence than AMs. However, there was a steep decline in persistence with all drugs after 1 month. This is unlikely to be wholly explained by anticholinergic adverse events, as it was also seen with MIR. The lower proportion of MIR patients who were treatment-naive reflects current prescribing guidelines whereby MIR is prescribed after an initial generic AM trial. The study was limited by the small number of MIR patients. Study identifier: ISN 178-MA-3059.

Pioglitazone and risk of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a European multidatabase cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Estimate and compare the risk of mortality in patients whose antidiabetic therapy is modified to include pioglitazone compared with an alternative antidiabetic medication at the same stage of disease progression. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Pooled analysis of clinical data collected from primary and/or secondary care settings in four European countries: Finland, The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK . PARTICIPANTS: 56 337 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus first prescribed pioglitazone between 2000 and 2011, and 56 337 patients never prescribed pioglitazone matched by treatment stage, history of diabetes, diabetes complications and cardiovascular disease, and year of cohort entry using exact and propensity score matching. Patients were followed-up for a mean of 2.90 (SD 2.21) and 2.83 (SD 2.37) years in the pioglitazone-exposed and non-pioglitazone-exposed groups, respectively. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality ascertained from clinical or registry data. Mortality was a planned secondary outcome in a study primarily studying the association of pioglitazone use with bladder cancer risk. RESULTS: The crude overall mortality rate per 10 000 patient years was 206 (95% CI 199 to 213) in the pioglitazone-exposed group and 448 (95% CI 438 to 458) in the non-pioglitazone-exposed group. The crude HR comparing pioglitazone to alternative antidiabetic exposure was 0.46 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.48). This reduced in magnitude to 0.67 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.70) following further adjustment for matching variables, propensity scores, age, gender and time-dependent variables representing use of alternative antidiabetic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In this large observational cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone exposure was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality across four European countries. Results should be interpreted with caution due to the potential for residual confounding. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance.

Characteristics of children and adolescents first prescribed proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2-receptor antagonists: an observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of pediatric patients prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) vs those of pediatric patients prescribed histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs). METHODS: Observational studies were conducted using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) and the PHARMO Database Network. Patients aged 0-18 years who were first prescribed a PPI or H2RA between October 1, 2009 and September 30, 2012 (THIN) or between September 1, 2008 and August 31, 2011 (PHARMO) were included. Patient characteristics were identified and compared between the PPI and H2RA cohorts using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: The mean age (years) was higher in the PPI than in the H2RA cohorts (THIN 12.3 [n = 8204] vs 5.4 [n = 7937], PHARMO 11.0 [n = 15 362] vs 7.1 [n = 6168]). Previous respiratory disease was more common in the PPI than in the H2RA cohort in THIN (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.08-1.30), as were asthma and respiratory medication use in PHARMO (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.12-1.45 and OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.10-1.38, respectively) and oral corticosteroid use in both databases (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.10-1.92 [THIN]; OR = 2.80, 95% CI = 2.11-3.71 [PHARMO]). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, and oral contraceptives were also more common in PPI than in H2RA cohorts in both databases. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients receiving PPIs and those receiving H2RAs may represent different patient populations. PPIs may be more commonly prescribed than H2RAs among patients with respiratory diseases.

Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: retrospective cohort study using datasets from four European countries.

OBJECTIVE:  To evaluate the association between pioglitazone use and bladder cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN:  Retrospective cohort study using propensity score matched cohorts. SETTINGS:  Healthcare databases from Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Data comprised country specific datasets of linked records on prescriptions, hospitals, general practitioners, cancer, and deaths. PARTICIPANTS:  Patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated pioglitazone (n=56 337) matched with patients with type 2 diabetes in the same country exposed to diabetes drug treatments other than pioglitazone (n=317 109). Two matched cohorts were created, using a 1:1 fixed ratio (nearest match cohort) and a 1:10 variable ratio (multiple match cohort). Patients were matched on treatment history and propensity scores accounting for several variables associated with pioglitazone initiation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:  Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by Cox's proportional hazards model with adjustments for relevant confounders. To assess the robustness of the findings, several sensitivity and stratified analyses were performed. RESULTS:  In the cohort exposed to pioglitazone treatment, 130 bladder cancers occurred over a mean follow-up time of 2.9 years. In the nearest match and multiple match cohorts not exposed to pioglitazone treatment, 153 and 970 bladder cancers were recorded, with a mean follow­up time of 2.8 and 2.9 years, respectively. With regards to bladder cancer risk, the adjusted hazard ratio for patients ever exposed versus never exposed to pioglitazone was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.30) and 1.00 (0.83 to 1.21) in the nearest and multiple match cohorts, respectively. Increasing duration of pioglitazone use and increasing cumulative dose were not associated with risk of bladder cancer (>48 months of pioglitazone use, adjusted hazard ratio 0.86 (0.44 to 1.66); >40 000 mg cumulative dose, 0.65 (0.33 to 1.26) in the nearest match cohort). CONCLUSIONS:  This study shows no evidence of an association between ever use of pioglitzone and risk of bladder cancer compared with never use, which is consistent with results from other recent studies that also included a long follow-up period. TRIAL REGISTRATION:  Registered to the European Union electronic register of post-authorisation studies (EU PAS register no EUPAS3626).

Infants born before 32 weeks of gestation or with respiratory disease are most likely to receive palivizumab in the Netherlands.

AIM: Palivizumab is reported to be effective in reducing respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation. Its licensed uses include infants younger than six months of age, born before 35 weeks of gestation or under two years old with congenital heart disease or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. We redressed lack of research in the Netherlands by studying whether infants who met the licensed indications received the drug. METHODS: Data were obtained from the PHARMO Database Network and The Netherlands Perinatal Registry for all linked infants born between 1 April 1999 and 31 March 2007. Determinants for receiving palivizumab were examined using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Only 15% of the 3321 infants who met the licensed indications received palivizumab and the strongest predictor was being born before 32 weeks of gestation, with an odds ratio of 49.1 (95% confidence interval 31.5-76.4). However, 50% of infants born before 32 weeks did not receive palivizumab and the subanalyses showed that the probability increased for infants born in later years, those who had respiratory distress syndrome and those hospitalised during the respiratory syncytial virus season. CONCLUSION: Only 15% of eligible infants in the Netherlands received palivizumab and they were mostly born before 32 weeks, in line with Dutch guidelines.