RESUMEN
AIMS OF THE STUDY: Iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) are important conditions affecting a large proportion of the general population, causing the patients physical and psychosomatic symptoms, particularly fatigue, and significantly affecting their quality of life. General practitioners (GPs) are frequently consulted with nonspecific symptoms due to the ID. However, little evidence is available to guide iron treatment. The aim of the Swiss Delphi study was to generate a broad consensual Swiss expert opinion in various therapeutic areas on diagnosis and treatment of ID/IDA and their practical implications. METHODS: Specific statements regarding clinical relevance, practical diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and treatment were evaluated by Swiss experts in various therapeutic areas using the Delphi method. “Consensus” was defined as ≥80% agreement; the agreement of 50–79% was defined as “critical”, of <50% as “disagreement”. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for most statements. In patients without systemic inflammation, the threshold of 30 μg/l provide a good accuracy for the diagnosis of ID without anaemia. Ferritin levels within the range 30–50 μg/l with TSAT <20% can indicate ID without anaemia. Iron replacement therapy is accepted for treatment, not only of IDA, but also of symptomatic ID without anaemia. GPs play a central role in diagnosis and management of ID. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus study provides potential therapeutic strategies for management of iron deficiency and is based on opinions of a high number of contributing specialists, providing their views from a wide range of clinical perspectives.  .
Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Técnica Delphi , Deficiencias de Hierro , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Ferritinas/análisis , Humanos , Inflamación/etiología , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cancer disease inducing an acquired hypercoagulable state is a well-established feature. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 4% to 20% of the patients and is the second cause of mortality in cancer; VTE incidence is four to six times higher in cancer patients compared to other patients. In the last 10 years, important randomised clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that long-term use of daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is more efficient than Vitamin K antagonists to treat VTE in cancer patients. First Italian, then American and more recently French national guidelines recommend the use of LMWH for 3 to 6 months for curative treatment of VTE in cancer patients with a clearly high level (A) of evidence. Despite convincing data, many physicians have not yet modified their clinical practice, doubting the tolerability of such a long period of subcutaneous injections. In fact, LMWH long-term use appears well tolerated and may also increase cancer patient survival. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to present the scientific rationale for long-term daily subcutaneous LMWH in cancer patients, and to reinforce the favourable benefit/tolerance tolerability ratio with this specific antithrombotic strategy.