Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spinal cord ; 54(suppl 1): s1-s6, aug. 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | BIGG - guías GRADE | ID: biblio-966031

RESUMEN

"STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to develop the first Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: The guidelines are relevant for inpatient and outpatient SCI rehabilitation settings in Canada. METHODS: The guidelines were developed in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. A Steering Committee and Working Group reviewed the relevant evidence on neuropathic pain management (encompassing screening and diagnosis, treatment and models of care) after SCI. The quality of evidence was scored using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A consensus process was followed to achieve agreement on recommendations and clinical considerations. RESULTS: The Working Group developed 12 recommendations for screening and diagnosis, 12 recommendations for treatment and 5 recommendations for models of care. Important clinical considerations accompany each recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The Working Group recommendations for the management of neuropathic pain after SCI should be used to inform practice."


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Neuralgia , Neuralgia/etiología , Neuralgia/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones
2.
Spinal Cord ; 54 Suppl 1: S1-6, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27444714

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to develop the first Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: The guidelines are relevant for inpatient and outpatient SCI rehabilitation settings in Canada. METHODS: The guidelines were developed in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. A Steering Committee and Working Group reviewed the relevant evidence on neuropathic pain management (encompassing screening and diagnosis, treatment and models of care) after SCI. The quality of evidence was scored using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A consensus process was followed to achieve agreement on recommendations and clinical considerations. RESULTS: The Working Group developed 12 recommendations for screening and diagnosis, 12 recommendations for treatment and 5 recommendations for models of care. Important clinical considerations accompany each recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The Working Group recommendations for the management of neuropathic pain after SCI should be used to inform practice.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia/etiología , Neuralgia/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Canadá , Humanos
3.
Spinal Cord ; 54 Suppl 1: S14-23, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27444715

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To develop the first Canadian clinical practice guidelines for treatment of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: The guidelines are relevant for inpatient and outpatient SCI rehabilitation settings in Canada. METHODS: The CanPainSCI Working Group reviewed the evidence for different treatment options and achieved consensus. The Working Group then developed clinical considerations for each recommendation. Recommendations for research are also included. RESULTS: Twelve recommendations were developed for the management of neuropathic pain after SCI. The recommendations address both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: An expert Working Group developed recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain after SCI that should be used to inform practice.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia/etiología , Neuralgia/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Canadá , Humanos
4.
Spinal Cord ; 54 Suppl 1: S24-7, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27444716

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: The project objectives were to develop the first Canadian recommendations on a model of care for the management of at- and below-level neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: The guidelines are relevant for inpatient and outpatient SCI rehabilitation settings in Canada. METHODS: On the basis of a review of the Accreditation Canada standards, the Steering Committee developed questions to guide the CanPainSCI Working Group when developing the recommendations. The Working Group agreed on recommendations through a consensus process. RESULTS: The Working Group developed five recommendations for the organization of neuropathic pain rehabilitation care in people with SCI. CONCLUSIONS: The Working Group recommendations for a model of care for at- and below-level neuropathic pain after SCI should be used to inform clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/métodos , Neuralgia/etiología , Neuralgia/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Humanos
5.
Spinal Cord ; 54 Suppl 1: S7-S13, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27444717

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To develop the first Canadian clinical practice guidelines for screening and diagnosis of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: The guidelines are relevant for inpatient and outpatient SCI rehabilitation settings in Canada. METHODS: The CanPainSCI Working Group reviewed evidence to address clinical questions regarding screening and diagnosis of neuropathic pain after SCI. A consensus process was followed to achieve agreement on recommendations and clinical considerations. RESULTS: Twelve recommendations, based on expert consensus, were developed for the screening and diagnosis of neuropathic pain after SCI. The recommendations address methods for assessment, documentation tools, team member accountability, frequency of screening and considerations for diagnostic investigation. Important clinical considerations accompany each recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The expert Working Group developed recommendations for the screening and diagnosis of neuropathic pain after SCI that should be used to inform practice.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Canadá , Humanos , Neuralgia/etiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones
6.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil ; 22(4): 277-287, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29339869

RESUMEN

Background: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) has been shown to be an effective therapy for managing pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, there is a lack of uptake of this therapy, and it is often not considered as a first-line treatment, particularly in the community. Objective: To develop a pressure ulcer model of care that is adapted to the local context by understanding the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing EST, and to describe key initial phases of the implementation process. Method: Guided by the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) and National Implementation Research Network (NIRN) frameworks, a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was used to complete key initial implementation processes including (a) defining the practice, (b) identifying the barriers and facilitators to EST implementation and organizing them into implementation drivers, and (c) developing a model of care that is adapted to the local environment. Results: A model of care for healing pressure ulcers with EST was developed for the local environment while taking into account key implementation barriers including lack of interdisciplinary collaboration and communication amongst providers between and across settings, inadequate training and education, and lack of resources, such as funding, time, and staff. Conclusions: Using established implementation science frameworks with structured planning and engaging local stakeholders are important exploratory steps to achieve a successful sustainable best practice implementation project.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Comunicación , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA