Kinetic tremor in Parkinson's disease--an underrated symptom.

Since the first description of the disorder which we now call "Parkinson's Disease" (PD) much has changed not only because of new therapeutic possibilities. Initially only the rest tremor was described. Today it is generally accepted that PD can be accompanied by different forms of tremor. Nevertheless the kinetic tremor is hardly examined and no attention is paid to it in clinical rating scales although it can already be found in old published drawings of PD-patients. To date instrumented investigations do not capture the most common kinetic tremor of PD that seems to be frequent under everyday life conditions. In order to assess the significance of kinetic tremor in PD, tremor during a spiral drawing task was investigated in an open study involving 870 patients. The results indicate that a combination of rest, postural and kinetic tremors constitute the most frequent tremor constellation in PD.

Changing dopamine agonist treatment in Parkinson's disease: experiences with switching to pramipexole.

1202 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease switched from other dopamine agonists to pramipexole under open conditions either abruptly or in an overlapping, gradual manner. Mostly insufficient effectiveness motivated the switch. The investigators gave equal preference to either an abrupt or an overlapping switch to pramipexole in this observational study. There was a tendency in favour of the overlapping switch procedure in those patients who were on a relatively higher dose of a dopamine agonist before the switch. The switch was performed because the investigators expected the effect of pramipexole on tremor, motor functions and depression/anhedonia to be better compared with previous dopamine agonists. The main reasons for switching to pramipexole (anti-tremor effect, anti-depressive/anti-anhedonic effect) as given by the physicians at baseline came up to expectations. The switch to pramipexole mostly yielded further improvements irrespective of the mode of switching.

Apolipoprotein E genotypes do not influence the age of onset in Huntington's disease.

OBJECTIVE: The epsilon4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene has been defined as a critical factor for early onset neurodegeneration in Pick's, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease. Unexpectedly, the epsilon4 allele appeared to delay the age of onset in Huntington's disease (HD) patients. Furthermore, sex specific effects were reported on earlier age of onset due to the ApoE epsilon2epsilon3 genotype in males with HD. The age of onset of HD is known to be negatively correlated with increasing lengths of pathogenetic CAG expansions in the huntingtin gene. METHODS: In order to examine the effects of CAG block lengths, we have correlated ApoE genotypes with the age of onset in 145 patients symptomatic for HD with psychiatric and somatic symptoms (depression, psychosis, dementia, choreic, and other movement disorders) harbouring only modestly expanded huntingtin alleles (41-45 CAGs). RESULTS: The negative correlation between age of onset and CAG block length was established in our HD cohort. Statistically significant effects of the epsilon4 allele were not obvious regarding clinical characteristics including age of onset, nor were any sex differences for the epsilon2epsilon3 genotype observed. CONCLUSION: The ApoE genotype does not affect the course of HD significantly.

A short scale for the assessment of motor impairments and disabilities in Parkinson's disease: the SPES/SCOPA.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale (SPES)/SCales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease (SCOPA)-a short scale developed to assess motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Eighty five patients with PD were assessed with the SPES/SCOPA, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale, and Schwab and England (S&E) scale. Thirty four patients were examined twice by two different assessors who were blinded to each other's scores and test executions. Additionally, six items of the motor section of the SPES/SCOPA were assessed in nine patients and recorded on videotape to evaluate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: The reproducibility of the sum scores in the clinical assessments was high for all subscales of the SPES/SCOPA. Inter-rater reliability coefficients for individual items ranged from 0.27-0.83 in the motor impairment section, from 0.58-0.82 in the activities of daily living section, and from 0.65-0.92 in the motor complications section. Inter-rater reliability of the motor items in the video assessments ranged from 0.70-0.87 and intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.81-0.95. The correlation between related subscales of the SPES/SCOPA and UPDRS were all higher than 0.85, and both scales revealed similar correlations with other measures of disease severity. The mean time to complete the scales differed significantly (p<0.001) and measured 8.1 (SD 1.9) minutes for the SPES/SCOPA and 15.6 (SD 3.6) minutes for the UPDRS. CONCLUSION: The SPES/SCOPA is a short, reliable, and valid scale that can adequately be used in both research and clinical practice.

[Pramipexole in Parkinson disease. Results of a treatment observation]. / Pramipexol bei der Parkinson-Krankheit. Ergebnisse einer Anwendungsbeobachtung.

Pramipexole is a novel, internationally available selective nonergot D2 dopamine agonist. The effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of pramipexole have been extensively proven in controlled trials in patients in the early and advanced stage of Parkinson's disease as monotherapy and in combination with L dopa. These trials indicated specific activity against tremor, anhedonia, and depression. Therefore, the present prospective, multicenter postmarketing surveillance study evaluated for the first time to what extent the results from the controlled pramipexole trials could be replicated under routine conditions in neurological practice and clinics. Modern scales were applied for the assessment of tremor and mood, i.e., the Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale (SPES), the Tremor Impact Scale (TIS), and the German version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-D). In 298 German Centers, 657 Parkinson's patients (365 men, 292 women) in advanced disease stages were treated with pramipexole in combination with levodopa. The average ages (+/- SD) were 67 (+/- 8.9) years for men and 69 (+/- 9.4) years for females. Motor functioning, especially tremor, motor complications, depression, and activities of daily living improved highly significantly (P < 0.0005), including self-rating by the patients. The dosage of levodopa could be reduced on average by 8% (P < 0.0001). This might contribute to a slowing of the disease progression in the long run. Dropouts due to side effects were observed only in 3.5% of the patients. Using new assessment scales suitable for routine application allowed confirmation of the results from controlled clinical trials with regard to tremor, anhedonia, and depression. The average daily dosage of pramipexole prescribed was 1.05 mg and thus was definitely lower than the average daily dosages of 2.35-2.66 mg used in controlled trials. This signifies that the option to adjust dosage according to effectiveness and tolerability under routine conditions yields a considerably lower incidence of adverse effects.

Double-blind crossover trial of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3/Machado-Joseph disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of a combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3/Machado-Joseph disease (SCA3/MJD). DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial in 22 patients with genetically confirmed SCA3/MJD. Study phases of 6 months were separated by a washout period of 4 weeks. Dosages were a combination of trimethoprim, 160 mg, and sulfamethoxazole, 800 mg, twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a combination of trimethoprim, 80 mg, and sulfamethoxazole, 400 mg, twice daily for 5.5 months. SETTING: Outpatient department of the Neurological Clinic, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ataxia ranking scale, self-assessment score, static posturography, and results of motor performance testing. Effects on the visual system were studied using the achromatic Vision Contrast Test System and the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test for color discrimination. Physical and mental health were documented using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of age, sex, age at onset, duration of the disease, phenotype, and CAG repeat length on test performance. RESULTS: Twenty of 22 patients completed the study. Dropouts were due to a rash (placebo phase) and an attempted suicide in a family conflict. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy had no significant effect in SCA3/MJD patients in the short-term analysis (2 weeks) or in the long-term interval (6 months). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reports that studied smaller groups of patients, treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not improve the diverse and complex movement disorders caused by SCA3/MJD. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had no effect on the visual system and cannot be recommended as a continuous treatment for SCA3/MJD patients.

Motor performance: normative data, age dependence and handedness.

Quantitative, apparatus-based assessment of motor performance is a useful tool when addressing questions of therapy evaluation, quality control and early detection of movement disorders. Until now, few such methods have been sufficiently standardised to allow their routine employment in the clinic. Before assessing the impaired performance of patients, the first stage of standardisation is the determination of criteria of normal performance in healthy subjects. We have standardised a multidimensional test battery for motor performance of the upper extremities (Schoppe's "motorische Leistungs-Serie" = MLS). On the basis of the performance of 80 healthy controls, normative algorithms which allow correction of performance with reference to age were calculated. Further, our investigation provided information concerning the complexity of normal motor performance and the question of laterality (handedness). Standardised apparatus-based quantification of performance promises to be a valuable supplement to rating scales in the evaluation of patient motor skills, particularly in the early stages of their illness.

SELEDO: a 5-year long-term trial on the effect of selegiline in early Parkinsonian patients treated with levodopa.

The SELEDO (from selegiline plus levodopa) study was carried out as a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, double- blind, multicenter long-term, 5-year trial to evaluate the possible advantages of combining selegiline and levodopa in the early treatment of Parkinson's disease. One-hundred-and-sixteen patients were randomized either to selegiline or placebo. Before starting the study medication, the levodopa dose was titrated to the individual requirements of each patient. The primary study end point (time when levodopa had to be increased by >50% of the titrated dose) was reached in 23 of 59 patients in the selegiline group and 26 of 48 patients in the placebo group. At the end of the 5 years' treatment period the rates derived from a life-table analysis were 50.4% in the selegiline group and 74.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.027, log-rank test). The median time to reach the primary end point was 4.9 years in the selegiline group and 2.6 years in the placebo group. In patients treated with selegiline, the mean levodopa dose changed only slightly over the 5 years of treatment compared to the initially titrated dose, but rose markedly in the placebo group, where the dose of levodopa had to be adjusted earlier than in the selegiline group. At the same time, the lower levodopa dosage in the selegiline group was accompanied by at least equal therapeutic efficacy (which is necessary for an unambiguous interpretation). Subgroup analyses showed greater benefit for selegiline treated) patients in the earlier stages. Long-term side effects appeared later in the selegiline group, although the difference was not significant. The early combination of selegiline and levodopa proved to be clearly superior to levodopa monotherapy.

Early institution of bromocriptine in Parkinson's disease inhibits the emergence of levodopa-associated motor side effects. Long-term results of the PRADO study.

Long-term levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease is typically associated with "motor side effects" consisting in dyskinesias and/or fluctuations in motility referred to as the on-off phenomena. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was to determine to what extent the development of such complications could be prevented by partial substitution of levodopa monotherapy (L-DOPA/benserazide) by bromocriptine in patients with early symptoms of the disease. The basic trial population included 674 newly diagnosed Parkinsonian patients that were randomly allocated to monotherapy with levodopa or a combination therapy based upon a nearly 40% replacement of levodopa by bromocriptine. The two target regimens had to be consistently maintained for 42 months. Parkinsonian symptoms were assessed by means of the Webster rating scale, the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression scale. Motor side effects and adverse events were recorded at each regular clinic visit. Neurological symptoms improved and stabilized in a similar manner during treatment with both regimens throughout the study period. Motor side effects were observed in more patients on levodopa alone than on combination therapy (28.8 vs 20%; p = 0.008). According to Kaplan-Meier estimates the cumulative probability of experiencing motor side effects was 0.43 on monotherapy, compared to 0.28 on combination therapy, which was equal to a one third reduction of risk (p = 0.025). In regard to motor side effects, the degree of substitution of levodopa proved relevant: patients with > 50% substitution by bromocriptine exhibited half the risk observed in those with < 30% (p = 0.045). The overall burden of motor side effects, as reflected by a sum score based upon the relevance, the severity and the extent of motor dysfunction, was also significantly less on combination therapy (p = 0.046). In conclusion, partial substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine (> 30%) as first-line treatment of Parkinson's disease proves active in the prophylaxis of levodopa associated motor side effects. Early combination therapy therefore extends the period of optimal disease control.

Early diagnosis in Parkinson's disease--limitation of biochemical markers and instrumental methods.

For most cases of Parkinson's disease (PD) we can estimate the time lag from the first onset of unspecific complaints until diagnosis by case history to be about 2 years. Until now the exact course of neurodegeneration in PD is still unknown. On base of recent knowledge we can discuss different models for the development of PD. There are substantially different possible approaches to recognise PD as soon as possible. The time interval for an earlier diagnosis is different for these methods and depends on the real course of neurodegerdation.

Bromocriptine lessens the incidence of mortality in L-dopa-treated parkinsonian patients: prado-study discontinued.

L-Dopa supplemented by a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor is considered the most potent therapeutic regimen prolonging active life in Parkinsonian patients. The long-term benefit of therapy is limited by adverse effects, such as dyskinesia and on-off phenomena, which can be mitigated by the concomitant administration of dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine. In order to quantify the beneficial impact of early combination therapy, a controlled clinical trial (PRADO: PRA videl1 + DO pa) in patients with early Parkinson's disease was carried out, whereby L-Dopa monotherapy (in a fixed combination with benserazide (DoBe) was being compared with the same combination plus bromocriptine (DoBeBro). Patients were recruited and treated by 101 practising neurologists in the Federal Republic of Germany and in Hungary. Twenty seven clinical university centers cross-checked the patients at regular intervals. The trial started with 3 months of DoBe monotherapy (median dose of 375 mg L-Dopa for both randomized groups) followed by gradual substitution of DoBe by bromocriptine over 3 months in one of the groups (250 mg L-Dopa/10 mg bromocriptine). The target medication was maintained from study months 6 to 54. Parkinsonian symptoms were classified according to the Webster rating scale, the Hoehn and Yahr scale and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. Adverse events and life status were checked at regular intervals. Special emphasis was given to motor performance tests. 587 patients (302 in the DoBe group and 285 in the DoBeBro group) were available for intention-to-treat analysis. Both groups were homogeneous at baseline in all observed parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Primary combination therapy of early Parkinson's disease. A long-term comparison between the combined regimen bromocriptine/levodopa and levodopa monotherapy--first interim report.

The aim of this multicenter randomized prospective study in patients with early Parkinson's disease is to differentiate over a 4-year period between levodopa/benserazide monotherapy and the corresponding combination with bromocriptine by the assessment of motorial side effects, therapeutical benefit and fine motorial skills. Although there is circumstantial evidence, that partial substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine carries benefit in preventing late levodopa-specific side effects and delaying the declining therapeutical benefit, so far no knowledge has been available how levodopa and the corresponding combination with bromocriptine would compare on a long-term basis. Such study appears all the more important since there are experimental findings consistent with a neurotoxic effect of levodopa on the one hand and some 'protective' impact of bromocriptine on the other. As to the practical procedure of the comparison, all patients were first treated with a levodopa monotherapy for 3 months. This was a platform for the consecutive randomized splitting of the patients into two groups receiving either continuing levodopa therapy or combination therapy, based upon at least 40 +/- 10% substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine. The investigation methods included, besides the usual clinical rating scales (Webster, Zung, Hoehn and Yahr), an apparative test series, the so-called 'MLS', which allowed a sensitive and reliable assessment of fine motorial skills. The results of the first 3 months of treatment with levodopa monotherapy before the consecutive splitting into the two treatment regimens demonstrate that the randomization was successful and that there were no significant differences, that potentially might interfere with the drug-specific evaluation afterwards. The results of the substitution phase show that combined treatment permitted a mean reduction of the levodopa dosage by 40%, without deterioration of therapeutic response. In addition, feasibility of the overall approach based upon a sophisticated interplay between the practising neurologists (101) and the centers (27) was demonstrated.

Assessment of symptoms of Parkinson's disease by apparative methods.

Established clinical scores assessing the severity of Parkinson's disease show high specificity but only low interrater reliability. Using them in therapy control in multicenter studies raises typical problems. We examined the MLS, a motor performance test, in an extended form including assessment of "tapping" regularity for its practicability in therapy control of Parkinson's disease. Assessing a group of right-handed healthy controls we obtained parameters which describe normal motor dexterity by mean values, standard deviations, age relationship and correlation between left and right hand. This method is thus a good tool for estimation of abnormalities in motor dexterity. In therapy control the comparison of results obtained before and after treatment allows a good objective evaluation of the therapeutic success.

Spin label study of red blood cell membranes in Huntington's disease.

Huntington's disease (HD) is an inherited degenerative disorder of the central nervous system. Various studies of peripheral tissues from HD patients have led to the assumption that this disease could be the expression of a generalized membrane defect. We have been unable to reproduce fundamental results on which this theory is based, namely differences between electron spin resonance spectra for erythrocytes from diseased and healthy persons. Contradictory results have been published for other methods as well so that it is necessary to rethink the membrane defect theory.

Electron spin resonance of erythrocytes in Huntington's disease.

Electron spin resonance (ESR) studies were carried out with MAL-6 as spin label on erythrocytes from 21 patients with Huntington's disease (HD) and 18 controls. No significant difference was found between the ESR spectra from HD patients and controls. These findings do not support the theory that HD is a generalized membrane defect.