Impact of Surgical Residency Integration on Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the context of surgical education reform, the integration of residency programs represents a significant milestone. Concerns about potential disruptions to patient care metrics amid these changes necessitate empirical investigation. METHODS: This study assessed the impact of integrating surgical residency programs on patient outcomes within Trauma and Acute Care Surgery services. Pre- and postintegration data were meticulously analyzed to evaluate key metrics, including length of hospital stay, recovery rates, and complication rates. RESULTS: Contrary to initial concerns, the introduction of residency programs did not yield significant alterations in patient care metrics. Analysis revealed consistent outcomes pre- and post-integration, indicating the resilience of patient care amidst educational reforms. Despite the introduction of a high-stakes training environment, patient outcomes remained stable. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the compatibility of educational advancements with the preservation of optimal patient care standards in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery services. Demonstrating the stability of patient care metrics in the face of educational reforms offers valuable insights for healthcare institutions considering similar initiatives. Overall, these findings contribute to the discourse on the value of surgical residency programs, reinforcing the importance of maintaining high-quality patient care standards while advancing surgical education.

Accuracy of Trauma Surgeons Prospective Estimation of the Injury Severity Score: A Pilot Study.

Injury Severity Score (ISS) has limited utility as a prospective predictor of trauma outcomes as it is currently scored by abstractors post-discharge. This study aimed to determine accuracy of ISS estimation at time of admission. Attending trauma surgeons assessed the Abbreviated Injury Scale of each body region for patients admitted during their call, from which estimated ISS (eISS) was calculated. The eISS was considered concordant to abstracted ISS (aISS) if both were in the same category: mild (<9), moderate (9-15), severe (16-25), or critical (>25). Ten surgeons completed 132 surveys. Overall ISS concordance was 52.2%; 87.5%, 30.8%, 34.8%, and 61.7% for patients with mild, moderate, severe, and critical aISS, respectively; unweighted k = .36, weighted k = .69. This preliminarily supports attending trauma surgeons' ability to predict severity of injury in real time, which has important clinical and research implications.

Collaborative Approach to Organ Donation in a Level II Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Although a shortage of organ donors is a continuing global problem in health care, obtaining authorization for donation after an individual experiences a traumatic nonsurvivable event can be difficult. OBJECTIVE: To improve organ donation practices at a level II trauma center. METHODS: After reviewing trauma mortality cases and performance improvement metrics with their organ procurement organization's hospital liaison, leaders at the trauma center implemented a multidisciplinary performance improvement initiative to engage the facility's donation advisory committee, provide education for staff members, and increase program visibility to create a more donation-friendly culture for the facility. RESULTS: The initiative led to an improved donation conversion rate and a greater number of organs procured. Continued education increased staff and provider awareness of organ donation, contributing to the positive outcomes. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary initiative that includes continuing staff education can improve organ donation practices and program visibility, ultimately benefiting patients in need of organ transplantation.

Adult golf cart injuries: A rising hazard off the course.

OBJECTIVE: Golf carts are increasingly being used as a means of transportation for travel in neighborhoods, city areas, and unpaved surfaces. The catchment area of our regional trauma center has seen an increase in golf cart use for transportation. In fact, Georgia has recently changed legislation to support the growing need for more defined laws around golf cart use. This study aims to further evaluate injury and outcome patterns in the adult population of northeast Georgia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of adult golf cart injured patients from 2018 to 2022. We evaluated key demographics, such as age and gender, along with the length of stay, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Outcomes included the injury type. RESULTS: The results showed that orthopedic injuries were the most common (n = 24). Most patients were in the driver's seat (76%). Ejection from the golf cart was common (82%). Geriatric patients, 65 and older, had an increased length of stay compared to patients under the age of 65 (10 vs 3.9 days). CONCLUSION: Based on these results, future work includes injury prevention, increased awareness of injury patterns in prehospital and hospital settings, and communities updating their ordinances.

Developing a Trauma Intermediate Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-specific nursing units are integral to providing quality trauma care. Yet, little has been published on intermediate care units for the trauma population. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to describe one trauma center's journey to develop and implement a trauma intermediate care unit. METHODS: The need for a trauma intermediate care unit was identified during the review of patient care at a Level II trauma center. An interdisciplinary team was created and met weekly for 6 months to plan the implementation of a trauma intermediate care unit. Education plans, training, equipment procurement, and staffing were evaluated throughout the process. RESULTS: Positive results were noted from the implementation of the intermediate care unit through the first year following implementation. The average length of stay for patients in the surgical trauma intensive care unit was reduced, resulting in cost savings for the organization. In addition, this collaborative work positively impacted patient safety, staff engagement, and finances. CONCLUSION: With leadership support, the proper key stakeholders, clear deliverables, and a well-defined development plan, the implementation of this intermediate care unit was successful.