Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger?

PURPOSE: Age-dependent studies about the clinical result after microfracture of cartilage lesions in the knee are still missing. This prospective study was performed to discover age-dependent differences in the results after microfracture over a period of 36 months. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2002, 85 patients (mean age, 39 years) with full-thickness chondral lesions underwent the microfracture procedure and were evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 18, and 36 months after surgery. Depending on the patients' age (< or =40 years or >40 years) and the localization of the defects (femoral condyles, tibia, and patellofemoral joint), the patients were assigned to 6 different groups. Exclusion criteria were meniscal pathologic conditions, tibiofemoral malalignment, and ligament instabilities. Baseline clinical scores were compared with follow-up data by use of paired Wilcoxon tests for the modified Cincinnati knee score and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. RESULTS: The scores improved in all groups over the whole study period (P < .05). Patients aged 40 years or younger had significantly better results (P < .01) for both scores compared with older patients. Between 18 and 36 months after microfracture, the ICRS score deteriorated significantly (P < .05) in patients aged over 40 years whereas younger patients with defects on the femoral condyles and on the tibia showed neither a significant improvement nor a significant deterioration in the ICRS score (P > .1). Magnetic resonance imaging 36 months after surgery revealed better defect filling and a better overall score in younger patients (P < .05). The Spearman coefficient of correlation between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging scores was 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results after microfracture of full-thickness cartilage lesions in the knee are age-dependent. Deterioration begins 18 months after surgery and is significantly pronounced in patients aged older than 40 years. The best prognostic factor was found to be a patient age of 40 or younger with defects on the femoral condyles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.

Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.

PURPOSE: To compare the precision and accuracy of 3.0-T and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the quantification of cartilage volume by using direct volumetric measurements as a reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local animal experimentation committee did not require its approval for this study. Porcine knees were obtained from an abattoir. These specimens were used to optimize imaging parameters regarding effective signal-to-noise ratio (SNRE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRE) for a fat-saturated spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (SPGR) sequence, a water excitation SPGR sequence, and a fast spin-echo sequence at 3.0 T and a fat-saturated SPGR sequence at 1.5 T. By using the optimized sequences, 18 specimens were imaged in less than 6 minutes per sequence. A fivefold repetition of measurements of four specimens was performed for precision analysis. Cartilage was segmented by using semiautomatic software to calculate the volume. After imaging, the cartilage was scraped off and the volume was measured directly by using a saline-displacement method to calculate accuracy. Precision and accuracy errors were calculated as the root-mean-squares of the single errors per specimen. RESULTS: SNRE and CNRE values, respectively, were highest for the water excitation sequence at 3.0 T (1.81 sec(-1/2) and 1.27 sec(-1/2)), followed by the fat-saturated SPGR sequence (1.52 sec(-1/2) and 1.07 sec(-1/2)). The fast spin-echo sequence and the fat-saturated SPGR sequence at 1.5 T had lower SNR(E) (1.27 sec(-1/2) and 0.59 sec(-1/2), respectively). Accuracy error for MR-based volume calculation at the femur was 5.0%, 3.0%, 21%, and 16% for the water excitation, fat-saturated SPGR, and fast spin-echo sequences at 3.0 T and the fat-saturated SPGR sequence at 1.5 T, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR imaging at 3.0 T was shown in our study to better quantify cartilage volume. SNRE and CNRE were substantially improved, resulting in significantly higher accuracy in determining cartilage volume.