Exceptional case of aortic atresia associated with atypical double aortic arch.

We present the unique case of atretic aortic valve associated with hypoplastic ascending aorta and double aortic arch of unusual configuration supplying retrograde blood flow to the coronary arteries.

Absent left main coronary artery in a case of pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum and right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation.

Right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation coexisting with left main coronary atresia in the setting of pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum is rare. In the case described, the left coronary artery (LCA) origin from the aorta could not be found on conventional angiography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. During surgery, multiple LCA branches originating from the finger-like continuum of the primitive right ventricular sinusoidal network were observed. A Damus-Kaye-Stansel anastomosis and an aortopulmonary shunt operation were performed. Shunt takedown and a bidirectional Glenn anastomosis followed at 3 months of age. At 18 months follow-up, the child is thriving with stable hemodynamics and a saturation of 85%. Awareness about this rare coronary artery anomaly is necessary to prevent catastrophic consequences. The challenges, complications, and lessons learned while treating this rare variant are discussed.

Reimplantation of the left coronary artery with aortic intramural course in an ALCAPA patient.

We present a case of an anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, with a proximal intramural course in the aortic wall. We describe the technique of its reimplantation at the site of the transverse aortotomy, using autologous pericardial patch enlargement of the newly created coronary ostium.

Neurocognitive deficit following mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Neurocognitive deficit is an important complication in patients undergoing open heart surgery. The aim of this prospective, contemporary study was to objectively measure neurocognitive brain function following mechanical mitral valve replacement and mitral valve repair. METHODS: Forty consecutive, unselected patients (mechanical valve replacement n=20, mean age 65+/-14; valve repair n=20, mean age 64+/-7, P=0.896) entered this prospective, contemporary study. Neurocognitive function was objectively measured by means of P300 auditory evoked potentials (peak latencies, ms) and two standard psychometric tests (Mini Mental State Examination, Trailmaking Test A (TTA)), preoperatively, 7 days and 4 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Before operation, neurocognitive brain function was comparable in both patients groups (mechanical valve replacement versus valve repair: P300 potentials 374+/-25 versus 378+/-46 ms; P=0.791 and TTA 57+/-15 versus 54+/-10 s; P=0.552). Following mechanical valve replacement, neurocognitive function continuously worsened (7 day-follow-up: P300 potentials 392+/-28, P=0.001 versus preop and TTA 65+/-17, P=0.0001; 4-month follow-up: P300 potentials 406+/-39, P=0.0004; TTA 69+/-17, P=0.0001). Interestingly, neurocognitive brain function was unaffected in patients undergoing valve repair (7-day follow-up: P300 potentials 386+/-40, P=0.890 versus preop and TTA: 53+/-10, P=0.644; 4-month follow-up: P300 potentials 374+/-36, P=0.166 and TTA 54+/-11, P=0.147). At 4-month follow-up, patients with mechanical prostheses performed worse as compared to valve repair (P300 potentials: P=0.024; TTA P=0.014). CONCLUSION: As shown by P300 auditory evoked potentials and Trailmaking Test A, there is marked neurocognitive damage related to mechanical valve replacement, whereas mitral valve repair does not affect neurocognitive function. This finding supports the beneficial effect of mitral valve repair over mechanical valve replacement in the decision-making tree of borderline cases, which are suitable for both types of procedure.