Savings in social expenditures for work incapacity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease depend on access to innovative therapies in Poland.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are an increasing burden for societies. We examined Polish Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) work incapacity expenditures for people with IBD compared with the general population. METHODS: Aggregate data were obtained on ZUS expenditures between 2012 and 2021 in Polish zlotys (PLN). Annual work incapacity benefit expenditures were analyzed and IBD benefit expenditures were examined relative to innovative IBD drug utilization in individual provinces. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2021, annual ZUS expenditures per person increased, while expenditures per IBD patient decreased. Proportionally, absenteeism was the largest ZUS expenditure in the general population, while disability pensions were the largest in the IBD population. ZUS expenditures due to absenteeism in the general population increased by PLN 282 per person; those due to disability pensions decreased by PLN 85. Disability pension spending due to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) decreased by PLN 371 and PLN 284, respectively, while absenteeism spending per person with CD and UC decreased (PLN 58 and PLN 35, respectively). Nationwide in 2021, 8.5% of people with CD and 1.9% of those with UC received innovative drugs. The percentage of people receiving innovative drugs and ZUS expenditure per person were inversely related in 9/16 provinces for CD and 5/16 for UC. CONCLUSION: Polish state spending on work incapacity benefits increased in the general population but decreased in people with IBD between 2012 and 2021. Use of innovative drugs was associated with reduced spending per person with IBD in some provinces.

To push or to pull? A clinical audit on the efficacy and safety of the pull and push percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in oncological patients.

BACKGROUND: The peroral "pull" technique and the direct "push" procedure are the two main methods for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Although pull-PEG is generally recommended as the first-line modality, many oncological patients require a push-PEG approach to prevent tumor seeding or overcome tumor-related obstruction. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both PEG procedures in cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive PEG procedures within a tertiary oncological center. Patients were followed up with the hospital databases and National Cancer Registry to assess the technical success rate for PEG placement, the rate of minor and major adverse events (AEs), and 30-day mortality rates. We compared those outcomes between the two PEG techniques. Finally, risk factors for PEG-related adverse events were analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression model adjusted for patients' sex, age, performance status (ECOG), Body Mass Index (BMI), diabetes, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) status (pre-/current-/post-treatment), and type of PEG. RESULTS: We included 1055 PEG procedures (58.7% push-PEG/41.4% pull-PEG) performed in 994 patients between 2014 and 2021 (mean age 62.0 [±10.7] yrs.; 70.2% males; indication: head-and-neck cancer 75.9%/other cancer 24.1%). The overall technical success for PEG placement was 96.5%. Although the "push" technique had a higher rate of all AEs (21.4% vs. 7.1%, Hazard Ratio [HR]  = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.9-4.3, p < 0.001), most of these constituted minor AEs (71.9%), such as tube dislodgement. The methods had no significant difference regarding major AEs and 30-day mortality rates. Previous CRT was associated with an increased risk of major AEs (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.0-7.2, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The risk of major AEs was comparable between the push- and pull-PEG techniques in cancer patients. Due to frequent tube dislodgement in push-PEG, the pull technique may be more suitable for long-term feeding. Previous CRT increases the risk of major AEs, favoring early ("prophylactic") PEG placement when such treatment is expected.

Biologic treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in Poland, 2012-2020: nationwide data.

INTRODUCTION: The frequency of biologic drug treatment for Polish patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn disease (CD) has been insufficiently studied. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze the use of biologic treatments among Polish patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used administrative data collected by the National Health Fund (Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia [NFZ]), Poland's sole public health care payer. IBD cases were defined as cases with at least 2 records assigned code K50 or K51 according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD­10) and either at least 2 reimbursed prescriptions for IBD drugs or intestinal surgery preceding the record. We identified IBD patients receiving biologic treatments reimbursed by the NFZ in the years 2012-2020. We assessed the percentages of patients receiving biologic treatments in terms of disease type, sex, age group, and place of residence. RESULTS: While 6.8% of Polish CD patients received biologic treatment in 2012, that figure reached 7.9% by 2020. Biologic treatments were given to 0.4% of UC patients in 2014, and 1.6% in 2020. Among patients with both CD and UC, significantly fewer women received biologic therapy than men. The highest percentages of patients receiving biologic treatment for CD and UC were found in the 10-19 age group, while patients over 70 were the adults most rarely treated with biologic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: We showed a growing use of biologic agents in the treatment of IBD in Poland. Womenreceive biologic treatment for IBD significantly less frequently than men. The pediatric population features the highest proportion of patients receiving such treatment.

Nationwide data on epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Poland between 2009 and 2020.

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Poland has been recognized to only a limited extent. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of IBD by analyzing data from the National Health Fund, Poland's sole public health insurer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Administrative health claims collected over the 2009-2020 period were used to identify patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). A definition of a case comprised at least 2 records assigned K50 or K51 codes, plus at least 2 prescriptions for IBD drugs reimbursed, or else intestinal surgery preceding the record. The crude and European age­ standardized rates (EASR) and 95% CIs were calculated for prevalence and incidence. Time trends were also analyzed. RESULTS: As of 2020, there were 23 574 patients with CD and 73 235 with UC. The CD and UC prevalence was respectively 61.6 (EASR 60.3) and 191.4 (EASR 187.85) per 100 000. The prevalence of CD and UC was higher in men (64.1; EASR 61.3 and 201.4; EASR 202.7, respectively) than in women (59.3; EASR 58.4 and 182.0; EASR 175.5, respectively). The incidence of CD was 4.7 per 100 000 (EASR 4.6), and that of UC 12.5 (EASR 12.3). Through the period 2012-2018, the prevalence of both conditions was rising, even though downward trends were noted for the disease incidence. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and incidence of IBD in Poland are presented, with time trends showing a substantial increase in the disease burden over the years 2009-2020.

The Use of Virtual Reality to Reduce Stress among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated with Vedolizumab.

(1) Background: The use of virtual reality (VR) in improving patient comfort related to medical procedures in oncology patients raised the question of whether similar benefits could be obtained by patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). (2) Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial, a total of 90 patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 allocation to either the VR immersion group or the routine-treated group. The primary outcome was to evaluate whether VR could decrease stress and anxiety related to a medical procedure. The secondary outcome was to assess the safety of the VR. (3) Results: A statistically significant improvement in well-being and psychological comfort (p = 0.046), feeling of relaxation (p = 0.046), sense of influence on the treatment process (p < 0.001), improved perception of the way the drug works (p < 0.001), improved positive attitude while waiting for the next administration of the drug (p = 0.026), and increased motivation for treatment (p = 0.026) was noticed in the intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications in the intervention and control groups. (4) Conclusions: The use of VR had a positive effect on the reduction of stress associated with vedolizumab treatment and could improve compliance.

Clostridioides difficile infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an underestimated problem?

INTRODUCTION: The use of antibiotics and possibility of microbiota disruption during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID­19) pandemic have raised questions about the incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the frequency of and risk factors for CDI in patients with COVID­19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single­center evaluation study on the frequency of and risk factors for CDI in patients with COVID­19 and in the prepandemic era. The analysis included 441 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) infection and 2961 pa­ tients hospitalized before the pandemic. RESULTS: A significant increase in the incidence of CDI was noted during the COVID­19 pandemic compared with the prepandemic period: 10.9% versus 2.6%, P <0.001. Risk factors for CDI in patients with COVID­19 included: age, length of hospital stay, occurrence of diarrhea during hospitalization, use of antibiotics other than azithromycin, and coexistence of nervous system disease or chronic kidney disease-all of these factos had a weak association with CDI development. The multivariable logistic regression model indicated other unassessed variables that had an impact on the CDI incidence rate. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a higher incidence of CDI in patients with COVID­19. Antibiotic therapy was a relevant risk factor for CDI, although its effect was weak. Other drugs used during the pandemic were not found to have an impact on disease development. Possible causes of CDI may include fecal microbiota disruption by SARS­CoV­2 infection, but further research is needed to validate this hypothesis.