Relapsing Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis due to Kocuria rhizophila: A Case Report.

Introduction: The Kocuria genus, encompassing gram-positive coccoid actinobacteria belonging to the Micrococcaceae family, has recently been discovered residing on the human skin and oral flora. Reports of Kocuria-associated infections in humans have been scarce. Herein, we present the first case of relapsing peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis caused by Kocuria rhizophila. Case Presentation: The patient, a 78-year-old male, presented with turbid effluent PD fluid, accompanied by an elevated white blood cell count of 253 cells/µL, of which 59% were neutrophils. A diagnosis of PD-associated peritonitis was established, leading to the initiation of intraperitoneal administration of ceftazidime and vancomycin. Subsequently, Kocuria rhizophila was identified through the bacterial culture of the dialysate. On the seventh day of initial treatment, the antibiotic regimen was changed to penicillin G, and the patient underwent a 3-week course of antibiotics. However, 1 week after discharge, the patient's dialysis fluid became cloudy once again, with subsequent detection of Kocuria rhizophila in the fluid culture. Ultimately, the decision was made to remove the patient's PD catheter and transition to hemodialysis. Conclusion: PD-associated peritonitis attributed to Kocuria species may be considered a potential risk for recurrence.

Intraoperative hemodialysis during open-heart surgery in patients with severe chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease (CKD) after cardiac surgery are associated with poor renal prognosis and increased mortality. The impact of intraoperative hemodialysis (IHD) on postoperative renal function remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the utility of IHD during open-heart surgery in patients with severe non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD-NDD) and its association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that employed IHD during non-emergency open-heart surgery in patients with CKD stage G4 or G5. Patients who underwent emergent surgery, chronic dialysis, and/or kidney transplantation were excluded. We retrospectively compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients from the IHD and non-IHD groups. The primary outcomes were 90-day mortality and postoperative initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were categorized into the IHD group and 33 into the non-IHD group. When comparing the IHD and non-IHD groups, men accounted for 60.7 vs. 50.3% of patients, the mean patient age was 74.5 (standard deviation [SD] 7.0) vs. 72.9 (SD 9.4) years (p = 0.744), and the proportion of patients with CKD G4 was 67.9 vs. 84.9% (p = 0.138). Regarding clinical outcomes, no significant differences were observed in the 90-day mortality (7.1 vs. 3.0%; p = 0.482) and 30-day RRT (17.9 vs. 30.3%; p = 0.373) rates between the groups. Among the patients with CKD G4, the IHD group had significantly lower 30-day RRT rates than the non-IHD group (0 vs. 25.0%; p = 0.032). RRT initiation was less likely for patients with CKD G4 (odds ratio 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.37; p = 0.002); however, IHD did not significantly decrease the incidence of poor clinical outcomes (odds ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-1.07; p = 0.061). CONCLUSIONS: IHD during open-heart surgery in patients with CKD-NDD did not improve their clinical outcomes with regards to postoperative dialysis. However, for patients with CKD G4, IHD may be useful for postoperative cardiac management.

Impact of ABO Compatibility/Incompatibility on the Perioperative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin G Levels in 2 Preoperatively Vaccinated Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant: A Case Report.

Herein, we monitored the perioperative anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobulin G titers in patients who were preoperatively vaccinated with 2 doses of a COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccine. Additionally, we compared the clinical settings between ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible pre-emptive kidney transplant (KTx). Case 1 was of a 45-year-old man who was an ABO-incompatible KTx recipient. Before transplant, his serum antibody titers decreased from 278 U/mL at baseline to 41.9 U/mL after desensitization therapy (84.9% lower) and 54.7 U/mL (80.3% lower) at day 8; it is now maintained at 4.1 U/mL at 6 months posttransplant (98.5% lower). Case 2 was of a 50-year-old man who was an ABO-compatible KTx recipient. His serum antibody titer level decreased from 786 U/mL at baseline to 386 U/mL on day 8 (50.8% lower) and is now maintained at 156 U/mL at 6 months posttransplant (80.1% lower). We suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobulin G titers should be monitored during the perioperative period to determine the optimal timing of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses for the maintenance of protective immunity, particularly in ABO-incompatible KTx recipients who require desensitization therapy.

Evaluation of the Correlation Between Responders and Non-Responders to the Second Coronavirus Disease Vaccination In Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is significantly lower than that in healthy controls. We evaluated immune responses after the COVID-19 vaccine and their possible relationship with other cofactors in KTx recipients. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 29 KTx recipients 2-8 weeks after receiving 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) immunoglobulin (Ig)-G levels were evaluated to define cofactors influencing the immune response between the responder (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level ≥0.8 U/mL) (n = 16) and nonresponder groups (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level <0.8 U/mL) (n = 13). The kinetics of antibodies between 2 and 6 months after the second vaccination was also compared between the groups. RESULTS: KTx recipients with IgG levels ≥0.8 U/mL were younger (54 [interquartile range {IQR}, 46.5-61] years vs 65 [IQR, 55-71.5] years; P = .01), had been transplanted for a longer median time (1588 [IQR, 1382-4751] days vs 1034 [IQR, 548.5-1833] days; P = .02), and were more often treated with a lower mycophenolate mofetil dosage (765.6 ± 119.6 vs 1077 ± 76.9 mg; P = .04) than KTx recipients with IgG levels <0.8 U/mL. There was no significant difference in antibody titers between time periods after the second dose in the responder group. At the 6-month follow-up, a serologic response against the SARS-CoV-2 S was observed in 44.4% of KTx recipients in the nonresponder group. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of KTx recipients developed a higher antibody response after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination.

Comparison of antibody response following the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in elderly patients with late-stage chronic kidney disease.

Background: Currently, it is unclear whether the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) could be an independent predictor of antibody response after administration of a COVID-19 vaccine. This study aimed to investigate the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with CKD stage G4 to G5 without renal replacement therapy and G5D using the recommended dose and schedule. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated immunogenicity regarding antibody response after COVID-19 vaccination in our hospital for late-stage CKD patients aged ≥ 60 years. We evaluated antibody responses in 48 patients with CKD G4, 35 patients with CKD G5, and 70 patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD; CKD G5D). Results: After the second vaccination, anti-SARS-CoV-2-S (Spike) IgG levels were found to be positive (> 0.8 U/mL) in all CKD G4 and G5 patients (100%), and 69 of 70 HD patients (98.5%). The median (interquartile range [IQR] S-IgG level (Ab titers) was 358 [130.2-639.2], 218 [117-377], and 185.5 [95.1-323.5] U/mL in the CKD G4, G5, and HD groups, respectively. The median S-IgG levels were significantly lower in the HD group than in the CKD G4 group (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the antibody titers between the CKD G4 and G5 groups. To further analyze the decline in S-IgG levels after 6 months, we additionally assessed and compared antibody titers at 1 month and 6 months after the second vaccination in the HD group. Compared with the median S-IgG levels of 185.5 [95.1-323.5] U/mL 1 month after the second dose, the median S-IgG level 6 months thereafter was significantly decreased at 97.4 [62.5-205.5] U/mL (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We highlight two major factors of variability in the vaccine response. First, in elderly patients with late-stage CKD, antibody titers tended to be lower in the G5D group than in the G4 and G5 groups despite the shorter time since vaccination; therefore, CKD stage progression might cause a decline in antibody titers. Second, waning immune responses were observed 6 months after second dose administration in HD patients advocating a potential need for a third booster dose vaccine after 6 months.

[Group a streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis of the genital area (Fournier's gangrene): a case report].

A necrotizing fasciitis especially caused by group A streptococcal infection is a life-threatening disease. This infection cause death due to septic shock and multiple organ failure in a short time without the immediate and adequate treatment. Currently a rapid test kit for streptococcal pharyngitis (strep A) is useful for prediction of group A streptococcal infection. We here demonstrate a 61 years old man's case of life-saved necrotizing fasciitis in genital area (Fournier's gangrene) by group A streptococcus infection, and usefulness of this kit for rapid diagnosis, aggressive debridement, and selection of adequate antibiotics.