Autoimmune Metaplastic Atrophic Gastritis (AMAG): Regional Demographics and Their Effect on Prevalence.

Autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis (AMAG) is a chronic immune-mediated form of gastritis characterized by damage to oxyntic cells, ultimately resulting in both iron deficiency with or without anemia and pernicious anemia. The current dogma is that AMAG is a disease of White Northern European women of advanced age. We, therefore, sought to examine the prevalence of AMAG in biopsies obtained from populations enriched for self-identified Hispanics for cross-comparison against data from previously reported populations enriched for self-identified White, non-Hispanic patients. To that end, we prospectively collected 1708 sequential gastric biopsies performed at the University of Miami Hospitals/Jackson Health Systems clinics from 1692 patients over a 1-year period as well as pertinent clinical parameters. These Florida data were then compared against data previously collected from the Baltimore population, which has far lower numbers of Hispanic patients. Self-identified race and/or ethnicity were used. From these 1692 patients, we identified 79 patients (4.6%) with AMAG. These included 60 women (76%) and 19 men (24%), with a F:M ratio of 3.1:1. Patients had a median age of 60 years (range: 15-83). Self-identified race and/or ethnicity were: 60 (76.0%) Hispanic, 9 (11.4%) Black, 9 (11.4%) White, and 1 Asian (1.2%). The median age at initial presentation was: 51 years (range: 15-83) in Hispanics, 77.2 years (range: 46-74) in Blacks, 59 years (range: 49-79) in Whites, and 58 years in the only Asian patient. The overall demographics of AMAG largely mirrored the Florida population, with an over-representation of Hispanics (Florida inhabitants self-report as 70% Hispanic). The overall 4.6% prevalence of AMAG in the Florida population differed significantly from the 1.1% in Baltimore (p < .00001), a finding that presumably reflects the large Hispanic population. In fact, the prevalence of AMAG is far higher in Hispanic patients. Awareness of these data should increase recognition of AMAG in this population.

Investigating the Obesity Paradox in Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis of Prospectively Collected Data in a Diverse Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies are inconclusive regarding the effect of obesity on mortality in persons with colorectal cancer (CRC). We sought to determine the association of pre-diagnosis body mass index (BMI) trajectories on mortality after CRC diagnosis. METHODS: Utilizing the Multiethnic Cohort, we included adults aged 18-75 between 1 January 1993 and 1 January 2019 with a diagnosis of CRC and at least three available BMIs. The primary exposure, BMI, was subjected to group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM). We evaluated all-cause and CRC-specific mortality, using Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. RESULTS: Of 924 persons, the median age was 60 years, and 54% were female. There was no statistically significant association between pre-cancer BMI trajectory and either all-cause or cancer-specific mortality. In competing risk analysis, the risk of CRC-specific mortality was higher for African Americans (HR = 1.56, 95% CI [1.00-2.43], p = 0.048) and smokers (HR = 1.59, 95% CI [1.10-2.32], p = 0.015). Risk of all-cause mortality was higher for Hawaiian persons (HR = 2.85, 95% CI [1.31-6.21], p = 0.009) and persons with diabetes (HR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.08-3.10], p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-diagnosis BMI trajectories were not associated with mortality after CRC diagnosis, whereas race/ethnicity, diabetes, and smoking were associated with an increased risk of death. Our findings suggest the obesity paradox alone does not account for mortality after CRC diagnosis.

Barriers to Community-Based Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Helicobacter pylori (HP) is a causative agent in gastric cancer (GC).1 In the United States, HP is more prevalent in racial and ethnic minorities, including African Americans, Asian Americans, Latinos, and immigrants, the same groups that are more likely to develop and die from GC.2 Although screening for HP is not presently performed in the United States, there are plausible benefits to doing so, because HP is considered a group 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organization, and its link to GC parallels that of human papilloma virus and cervical cancer.1 HP eradication as a means of preventing GC also fulfils the Wilson and Jungner criteria for a successful screening program, and literature has consistently demonstrated that HP eradication reduces GC risk and death from GC.3 In fact, in countries with a high burden of GC, HP eradication is considered primary prevention for GC. As such, targeted HP testing in the United States may reduce GC burden in high-risk groups.4 We evaluate the results of community-based HP testing in an at-risk, underserved population.

Demographics, distance to gastrointestinal specialists, and social deprivation are associated with advanced stage of gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis.

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) luminal cancers can be detected at early stages by endoscopic procedures. Place-based factors, such as social deprivation and distance to specialist care, are under-investigated with regard to the stage of diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study among persons ≥18 years of age in the Florida Cancer Data System, a population-based cancer incidence registry. We included persons diagnosed with esophageal cancer, gastric canceror colorectal cancer, with at least 1 measure of geographic location during the period January 1, 1981, to December 31, 2016. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the stage of diagnosis, including social deprivation and proximity to GI care. Results: Among 379,054 persons, the median age was 71 years, and 54% were male. Distant stage disease was significantly less likely than local stage in those of non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.94, P<0.001). Distant disease was more likely in African Americans (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.26-1.34) and Asians (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.27-1.56, P<0.001), with each 5-min increase in travel time to specialists, (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01-1.02, P<0.001), and with each 10-point increase in Social Deprivation Index (OR 1.01, 95%CI 1.01-1.02, P<0.001). Conclusions: A greater distance from care and living in areas with increased deprivation are associated with an advanced stage of diagnosis and should be recipients of policy-driven efforts to improve access to care. That the strongest risk factors include minority race and ethnicity underlines the complexity of healthcare disparities.

Association between country of birth and gastric intestinal metaplasia: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: As a precursor to gastric cancer, gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) represents a target for surveillance. US-based guidelines recommend surveillance of racial/ethnic minorities and immigrants from high incidence gastric cancer regions, yet there is marked variability in prevalence amongst these subgroups and within groups from high incidence regions. There is a paucity of information regarding country of birth as a risk factor for GIM and we sought to determine the association between country of birth and GIM in an ethnically and racially diverse US population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of persons who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with gastric biopsy at University of Miami Hospital between 2011 and 2021. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was developed and implemented to extract diagnoses of GIM and Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection from endoscopic pathology reports. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors for GIM, accounting for important covariates, including country of birth. Findings: A total of 21,108 persons from 130 varying countries of birth were included in the study. A total of 1699 cases of GIM were identified yielding a prevalence of 8.0% (95% CI: 7.7-8.4%). Multivariable analysis was restricted to countries with at least 100 persons in the cohort, yielding 15 countries with 1208 cases of GIM. Country of birth (p < 0.0001), race/ethnicity (p = 0.026), active HP infection (p < 0.0001), and increasing age (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with increased odds of GIM. Highest odds for GIM were among persons born in Ecuador (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.56-3.50), Honduras (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.65-3.34), and Peru (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.58-2.99). Interpretation: We demonstrate that country of birth is a key risk factor for GIM. Not all countries that are thought to be in "high-risk" regions are associated with higher rates of GIM, underlining the importance of studying the under-investigated risk factor of country of birth. Guidelines should account for country of birth, in addition to other risk factors, to tailor screening/surveillance appropriately. Funding: Shida Haghighat, MD, MPH is supported by an NIH training grant T32 DK 11667805.

Urgent need to mitigate disparities in federal funding for cancer research.

We evaluate National Cancer Institute (NCI) funding distribution to the most common cancers, considering their respective public health burdens, and explore associations between funding and racial and ethnic burden of disease. The NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, US Cancer Statistics database, and Funding Statistics were used to calculate funding-to-lethality (FTL) scores. Breast and prostate cancer had the first (179.65) and second (128.90) highest FTL scores, and esophagus and stomach cancer ranked 18th (2.12) and 19th (1.78). We evaluated whether there were differences between the FTL and cancer incidence and/or mortality within individual racial and ethnic groups. NCI funding correlated highly with cancers afflicting a higher proportion of non-Hispanic White individuals (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.84; P < .001). Correlation was stronger for incidence than mortality. These data reveal that funding across cancer sites is not concordant with lethality and that cancers with high incidence among racial and ethnic minorities receive lower funding.

No difference in outcomes with 15 mm vs. 20 mm lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared outcomes between use of 15 vs. 20 mm lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) for gastric outlet obstruction. METHODS: Databases were queried for studies that used LAMS for EUS-GE to relieve gastric outlet obstruction, and a proportional meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. The 15 mm and 20 mm LAMS had pooled technical success rates of 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.5%-95.2%) and 92.1% (95% CI, 68.4%-98.4%), clinical success rates of 88.6% (95% CI, 85.4%-91.1%) and 89.6% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.1%), adverse event rates of 11.4% (95% CI, 8.1%-15.9%) and 14.7% (95% CI, 4.4%-39.1%), and reintervention rates of 10.3% (95% CI, 6.7%-15.4%) and 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.6%), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in technical success, clinical success, or adverse event rates. An increased need for reintervention was noted in the 15 mm stent group (pooled odds ratio, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.40-9.18; p=0.008). CONCLUSION: No differences were observed in the technical, clinical, or adverse event rates between 15 and 20 mm LAMS use in EUS-GE. An increased need for reintervention is possible when using a 15 mm stent compared to when using a 20 mm stent.

Intragastric Balloon Significantly Improves Metabolic Parameters at 6 Months: a Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that by 2030, 38% of the world population will be overweight, and another 20% will be people with obesity. Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are an option in conjunction with lifestyle modification for the treatment of obesity. We sought to investigate the effects of IGB therapy on hemoglobin A1c (A1c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides (TGs). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried through November 2021 to identify studies that evaluated the effects of IGB therapy on selected variables at 6 months. A total of 17 studies and 1198 patients met inclusion criteria. Results were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: At 6-month post-IGB insertion, patients had a significant reduction in A1c (mean difference (MD): - 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 0.884 to - 0.355, p < 0.001), SBP (MD: - 8.39, 95% CI: - 11.39 to - 5.386, p < 0.001), DBP (MD: - 5.807, 95% CI: - 8.852 to - 2.76, p < 0.001), TC (MD: - 9.189, 95% CI: - 15.763 to - 2.616, p = 0.006), LDL (MD: - 5.20, 95% CI: - 9.05 to - 1.35, p = 0.008), and TGs (MD: - 25.35, 95% CI: - 40.30 to - 10.10, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in HDL (MD: 1.245, 95% CI: - 0.11 to 2.60, p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that IGB therapy is associated with improvements in insulin resistance, blood pressure, and dyslipidemia at 6 months. The results of this analysis suggest that IGB placement can be a viable treatment option to improve important metabolic parameters beyond weight loss alone.

Trends in the Incidence of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Show Changing Dynamics.

Over the last 50 years, there have been shifts in the incidence of gastric and esophageal cancers in the United States, including a decline in noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma (NCGC), and increases in cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (CGC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).1,2 Hypotheses for the changing incidences include eradication of Helicobacter pylori, the main causative agent of NCGC, and rising rates of reflux, obesity, and diet, which are risk factors associated with EAC and CGC.1,3.