A revalidation of the Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness as a brief measure of intelligence through comparison with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III.

In earlier research, Rossini, Wygonik, Barrett, and Friedman (1994) demonstrated that the Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness (TMA) is a valid, brief measure of intelligence by comparing it to the Wechsler Scale of Adult Intelligence-Revised, which was at that time the "gold standard" of IQ assessment. Since that study, the WAIS has again been revised and reissued in a third edition, the WAIS-III. We assessed the relationship between scores on the Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness and this latest WAIS test to see if there is still a predictive relationship between the two tests. Correlations between the two tests and the accuracy of TMA point estimates of IQ indicate that the Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness remains a viable brief measure of adult intelligence.

Relations among positive affect, negative affect, and somatic symptoms in a medically ill patient sample.

The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), a brief measure of Positive and Negative Affect, may be useful in assessing mood of medical patients because it does not include somatic items frequently confounded with medical conditions. In previous research Positive and Negative Affect have been independent and uncorrelated, and Negative Affect but not Positive Affect has been positively correlated with somatic symptoms. However, relationships between variables may vary in different populations, and there is relatively little information on Positive and Negative Affect in medical patients. In the current study, the PANAS was used to assess the relationships among Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and somatic symptoms and pain in a medically ill hospital population. Positive and Negative Affect scores were positively correlated and for patients reporting pain, Positive Affect scores were positively correlated with pain intensity. Results from this and other studies indicate that Positive and Negative Affect are independent but in some populations may be correlated; positive affects such as hopefulness may co-occur with both somatic complaints and psychological distress.

Effects of physical and sexual abuse in facial pain: direct or mediated?

Research has identified a relationship between a history of physical and/or sexual abuse and a range of psychological, functional, and physical factors; however, the nature of this relationship has not been tested. We hypothesize two different mechanisms through which an abuse history could influence later life distress and dysfunction. A history of abuse could increase an individual's vulnerability to emotional distress or could increase an individual's tendency to attend, amplify, and over-interpret somatic symptoms. The purpose of this study was to test the influence of emotional distress and somatic focus on the relationship between a history of physical and/or sexual abuse and later chronic painrelated disability in patients with temporomandibular disorders. The subjects were 139 female patients evaluated at a facial pain clinic. Of the 139 subjects, 49% (n = 69) reported a history of physical and/or sexual abuse. Abused subjects reported significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms than nonabused subjects. Path analysis with latent variables, using the LISREL-8 (Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago, Illinois) statistical program was used to test the hypothesized relationships. When emotional distress and somatic focus were tested as mediators, the path coefficient from somatic focus to physical functioning was significant (beta = -0.38) while the path coefficient from negative emotion to physical functioning was not significant. These results favor somatization as the hypothesized mechanism over the emotional distress vulnerability hypotheses.

The Coping Strategies Questionnaire: a large sample, item level factor analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a measure of coping in chronic pain patients, was subjected to item-level exploratory factor analysis. SUBJECTS: A sample of 965 chronic pain patients were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Principal components analysis using a varimax rotation procedure identified nine factors that accounted for 54.5% of the variance. Of these nine factors, the first five represent subscales of the original CSQ subscales. The catastrophizing subscale replicated with significant loadings for all six original items, and ignoring sensations replicated with five of six items. Factors representing reinterpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, and diverting attention subscales also appeared. The items from the praying and hoping subscale split into separate praying and hoping factors (factors 6 and 8). When reliability coefficients were calculated, factors 7 through 9 had unacceptably low internal consistency and thus were not considered stable factors. Correlations between factors 1 through 6 and other measures of psychological and physical functioning were calculated in the construct validation portion of this study. Previously found relationships were replicated in that the correlations between CSQ factor scores and measures of pain, depression, and disability were in the same direction in this data set as those previously reported.

Bias effects in three common self-report pain assessment measures.

OBJECTIVE: Past research has shown response biases to influence the accuracy of results from self-report measures. In pain assessment, where a percentage of patients have financial and other reasons to minimize or exaggerate psychological disturbance, it becomes especially important to identify the influence of response bias in self-report of adjustment. This study investigated the susceptibility of three commonly used self-report pain assessment measures to response bias. DESIGN: This study used a within-subjects (asymptomatic subjects) design with two experimental conditions and nonequivalent control group (chronic pain patients). SUBJECTS: Experimental group: 40 students enrolled in an occupational therapy program at a major southeastern United States university. CONTROL GROUP: 200 subjects referred to a multidisciplinary pain clinic at a major teaching hospital. MEASURES: Coping Strategies Questionnaire, Multidimensional Pain Inventory, and Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory. RESULTS: With few exceptions, asymptomatic subjects scored significantly differently on these measures while portraying themselves as either coping well or coping poorly. In addition, when using the "coping poorly" response set, asymptomatic subjects reproduced scores similar to those of symptomatic chronic pain patients. CONCLUSION: The susceptibility to manipulation appeared constant across the three measures, a finding that highlighted the difficulties clinicians and researchers encounter in accurate interpretation of results from these measures in the absence of validity indicators. This study also emphasizes the ease with which subjects with sufficient motivation can present themselves in an untruthful and manipulative manner and can generate scores that are, on their own, difficult to distinguish from those of a group of typical chronic pain patients.

Change mechanisms associated with combined relaxation/EMG biofeedback training for chronic tension headache.

Therapeutic mechanisms hypothesized to underlie improvements in tension headache activity achieved with combined relaxation and electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy were examined. These therapeutic mechanisms included (1) changes in EMG activity in frontal and trapezii muscles, (2) changes in central pain modulation as indexed by the duration of the second exteroceptive silent period (ES2), and (3) changes in headache locus of control and self-efficacy. Forty-four young adults with chronic tension-type headaches were assigned either to six sessions of relaxation and EMG biofeedback training (N = 30) or to an assessment only control group (N = 14) that required three assessment sessions. Measures of self-efficacy and locus of control were collected at pre- and posttreatment, and ES2 was evaluated at the beginning and end of the first, third, and last session. EMG was monitored before, during, and following training trials. Relaxation/EMG biofeedback training effectively reduced headache activity: 51.7% of subjects who received relaxation/biofeedback therapy recorded at least a 50% reduction in headache activity following treatment, while controls failed to improve on any measure. Improvements in headache activity in treated subjects were correlated with increases in self-efficacy induced by biofeedback training but not with changes in EMG activity or in ES2 durations. These results provide additional support for the hypothesis that cognitive changes underlie the effectiveness of relaxation and biofeedback therapies, at least in young adult tension-type headache sufferers.

Enhancing the effectiveness of relaxation-thermal biofeedback training with propranolol hydrochloride.

This article evaluated the ability of propranolol to enhance results achieved with relaxation-biofeedback training. Thirty-three patients were randomized to relaxation-biofeedback training alone (administered in a limited-contact treatment format), or to relaxation-biofeedback training accompanied by long-acting propranolol (with dosage individualized at 60, 120, or 180 mg/day). Concomitant propranolol therapy significantly enhanced the effectiveness of relaxation-biofeedback training when either daily headache recordings (79% vs. 54% reduction in migraine activity) or neurologist clinical evaluations (90% vs. 66% reduction) were used to assess treatment outcome. Concomitant propranolol therapy also yielded larger reductions in analgesic medication use and greater improvements of quality of life measures than relaxation-biofeedback training alone but was more frequently associated with side effects.