Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 121: 1-5, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Swallowing difficulties are best assessed by videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS). However, limiting radiation exposure is important, especially in young children. The purpose was to evaluate radiation dose in young children during VFSS, and to investigate factors associated with it. METHODS: Children with swallowing difficulty who underwent VFSS from February 2012 to July 2014 were recruited. Dose area product (DAP) and screening time were offered by the fluoroscopy machine, and effective dose was calculated from the DAP using a conversion coefficient published by the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB-R262). The age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), underlying disease of the subject children, and results of VFSS were investigated. RESULTS: In 89 children (mean age 1.57 ±â€¯2.17, 55 boys and 34 girls), mean effective dose was 0.29 ±â€¯0.20 mSv, mean DAP was 2.41 ±â€¯1.65 Gy cm2, and mean screening time was 2.24 ±â€¯0.99 min. The effective dose correlated with the screening time (r = 0.598, p < 0.001), age (r = 0.210, p = 0.049), height (r = 0.521, p < 0.001), weight (r = 0.461, p < 0.001), and BSA (r = 0.493, p < 0.001). There was no such correlation with gender, BMI, underlying disease, or the results of VFSS. CONCLUSIONS: The effective dose during VFSS (0.29 mSv) in young children, which is affected by screening time, age, and body size, is considerably lower than the pediatric radiation exposure limit of 1 mSv per year. However more than 4 VFSS annually would exceed this limit. Our findings will help physicians to reduce the radiation exposure and provide a useful references for future pediatric VFSS guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Fluoroscopía , Dosis de Radiación , Grabación en Video , Preescolar , Deglución , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Exposición a la Radiación
2.
Ann Rehabil Med ; 40(2): 223-9, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27152271

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) improves visuospatial attention in stroke patients with left visuospatial neglect. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: anodal tDCS over the right PPC, cathodal tDCS over the left PPC, or sham tDCS. Each patient underwent 15 sessions of tDCS (5 sessions per week for 3 weeks; 2 mA for 30 minutes in each session). Outcome measures were assessed before treatment and 1 week after completing the treatment. RESULTS: From pre- to post-treatment, there was an improvement in the motor-free visual perception test (MVPT), line bisection test (LBT), star cancellation test (SCT), Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and Functional Ambulation Classification in all 3 groups. Improvements in the MVPT, SCT, and LBT were greater in the anodal and cathodal groups than in the sham group. However, improvements in other outcomes were not significantly different between the 3 groups, although there was a tendency for improved CBS or K-MBI scores in the anodal and cathodal groups, as compared with the sham group. CONCLUSION: The study results indicated that the facilitatory effect of anodal tDCS applied over the right PPC, and the inhibitory effect of cathodal tDCS applied over the left PPC, improved symptoms of visuospatial neglect. Thus, tDCS could be a successful adjuvant therapeutic modality to recover neglect symptom, but this recovery might not lead to improvements in activities of daily living function and gait function.

3.
Ann Rehabil Med ; 39(5): 793-9, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26605178

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could improve dysarthria in stroke patients at the subacute stage. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Patients who had unilateral middle cerebral artery infarction were enrolled. In patients in the rTMS group, we found hot spots by searching for the evoked motor potential of the orbicularis oris on the non-affected side. We performed rTMS at a low frequency (1 Hz), 1,500 stimulations/day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks on the hotspots. We used the same protocol in the sham stimulation group patients as that in the rTMS group, except that the angle of the coil was perpendicular to the skull rather than tangential to it. The patients in both groups received speech therapy for 30 minutes, 5 days a week from a skilled speech therapist. The speech therapist measured the Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonology, alternative motion rates, sequential motion rates, and maximal phonation time before and after intervention sessions. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study and 20 completed the study. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements on the dysarthria scales in both groups. The sequential motion rate (SMR)-PǝTǝKǝ showed significantly greater improvement in the rTMS group patients than in the sham stimulation group. CONCLUSION: Patients in the rTMS group showed greater improvement in articulation than did patients in the sham rTMS group. Therefore, rTMS can have a synergistic effect with speech therapy in treating dysarthria after stroke.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...