RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the association of operative time (ORT) with perioperative morbidity and whether there is an ORT at which minimally invasive myomectomy becomes inferior to laparotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Myomectomy cases identified by CPT code from 2005 to 2016. INTERVENTION(S): Cases were stratified and analyzed by surgical approach and 90-minute intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Thirty-day postoperative morbidity. RESULT(S): A total of 11,709 myomectomies were identified; 4,673 (39.9%) were minimally invasive, 6,997 (59.8%) were abdominal, and 39 (0.3%) were conversions. The incidence of complications significantly increased with ORT. After adjusting for confounders, mean ORT in minutes (95% confidence interval) was 113 (111-115) for abdominal, 156 (153-159) for minimally invasive, and 172 (148-200) for conversions. Despite shorter ORT, morbidity was greater in abdominal cases (16% vs. 5.7%), with the highest rates in converted cases (20.5%). The minimally invasive approach in general had lower odds of complications (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.26). However, when minimally invasive surgery ORT reached ≥ 270 minutes, the odds of a composite complication variable increased compared with abdominal cases <90 minutes (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-3.13). Of minimally invasive cases, 88% were completed in <270 minutes. CONCLUSION(S): ORT was predictive of complications for both minimally invasive and abdominal myomectomies. Despite longer ORTs, minimally invasive procedures generally had superior 30-day outcomes up to 270 minutes. Careful patient counseling and preparation to increase surgical efficiency should be prioritized for either approach.