Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy rate of the one breath-hold single voxel hydrogen-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in comparison with intraoperative biopsy for liver fat quantification in living-donor liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 living liver donors participated in this study. Each patient underwent both MRS and intraoperative biopsy for evaluation of liver fatty content. MRS was performed using 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging and placed in segments 2-4, 5-8, and left lateral segment for each donor. Accuracy was assessed through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of MRS fat fractions were also calculated. RESULTS: Eighty living-donor liver transplantation donors were enrolled in this study. There was no fatty liver in 59 subjects (73.8%), 5% to 10% fatty liver in 17 subjects, 11% to 15% fatty liver in 3 subjects, and >16% fatty liver in 1 subject. MRS fat fraction showed excellent parameters to predict between normal liver and fatty liver groups (1.85% ± 0.98, 8.13% ± 3.52, respectively; P < .0001). Linear regression between MRS fat fraction and pathology grading showed high correlation (R(2) = 0.7092). Pearson correlation revealed high correlation between MRS and pathology results (r = 0.936), poor correlation between body mass index and pathology results (r = 0.390). The sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver steatosis in MRS fat fraction were 95.2% and 98.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: (1)H MRS fat fraction is a highly precise and accurate method in quantification of hepatic steatosis for the living donor and can be finished in a single breath-hold.

Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using Inflow Sensitive Inversion Recovery Technique for Vascular Evaluation in Pre-liver Transplantation Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular anatomy is essential in pretransplantation survey. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of inflow sensitive inversion recovery (IFIR) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the recipient's hepatic vasculature before liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one pre-liver transplantation patients underwent both IFIR and conventional contrast-enhanced MRA using a 1.5T MR scanner from December 2012 to December 2014. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between liver parenchyma and hepatic vasculature were calculated. The image sets of IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA were assessed for subjective image quality and depiction of hepatic vasculature on vessel-to-vessel basis by two independent radiologists. RESULTS: The quantitative results of CNR for hepatic arteries on IFIR were significantly lower than contrast-enhanced MRA, whereas CNR for portal veins and inferior vena cava on IFIR were significantly higher than contrast-enhanced MRA. For subjective assessment of image quality, the overall agreement of scores of IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA was substantial (kappa values ranged from 0.650 to 0.767). There was no significant difference in the image quality for portal veins between IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA. The quality scores of IFIR were significantly lower than contrast-enhanced MRA for hepatic arteries. For inferior vena cava evaluation, the scores of IFIR were significantly higher than contrast-enhanced MRA. CONCLUSION: IFIR MRA is a reproducible and noninvasive tool to assess the hepatic vasculature that can provide adequate to good image quality. In pre-liver transplantation patients, IFIR MRA becomes even more useful if contrast medium is a contraindication due to impaired renal and liver functions.