Determination of the palatal masticatory mucosa thickness by dental MRI: a prospective study analysing age and gender effects.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate age and gender effects on the palatal masticatory mucosa thickness by using non-invasive and non-ionizing MRI. METHODS: 40 periodontally healthy participants of five gender-balanced age groups (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60-69 years, respectively) underwent dental MRI at 3 Tesla using a contrast-enhanced, high-resolution 3D-sequence. The palatal masticatory mucosa was measured at 40 standard measurement points by two independent observers. Statistical analysis was performed by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Shapiro-Wilk test, two-way analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey HSD test. RESULTS: Measurements of the palatal masticatory mucosa thickness were highly reliable with a mean intraobserver ICC of 0.989 and a mean interobserver ICC of 0.987. Mean palatal masticatory mucosa thickness increased with the distance from the gingival margin in all tooth regions. Molars showed a considerably lower average palatal masticatory mucosa thickness at intermediate heights in comparison to canines and premolars. Average palatal masticatory mucosa thickness continuously increased with age and significantly differed between age groups (p < 0.01). A significant increase was observed between the age groups of 30-39 years and 40-49 years (p = 0.04). Gender had no significant effect on average palatal mucosa thickness (p = 0.19). However, there was a tendency towards thicker mucosa in males (mean ± SD, 3.36 mm ± 0.47) compared to females (3.23 mm ± 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, dental MRI allowed for a highly reliable determination of the palatal masticatory mucosa thickness. Considerable intra- and interindividual variations in palatal masticatory mucosa thickness were observed. Average palatal masticatory mucosa thickness was dependent on age but not on gender.

Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is equivalent to lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCR, "gold standard") in cephalometric analysis. METHODS: The applied MRI technique was optimized for short scanning time, high resolution, high contrast and geometric accuracy. Prior to orthodontic treatment, 20 patients (mean age ± SD, 13.95 years ± 5.34) received MRI and LCR. MRI datasets were postprocessed into lateral cephalograms. Cephalometric analysis was performed twice by two independent observers for both modalities with an interval of 4 weeks. Eight bilateral and 10 midsagittal landmarks were identified, and 24 widely used measurements (14 angles, 10 distances) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis and two one-sided tests (TOST) within the predefined equivalence margin of ± 2°/mm. RESULTS: Geometric accuracy of the MRI technique was confirmed by phantom measurements. Mean intraobserver ICC were 0.977/0.975 for MRI and 0.975/0.961 for LCR. Average interobserver ICC were 0.980 for MRI and 0.929 for LCR. Bland-Altman analysis showed high levels of agreement between the two modalities, bias range (mean ± SD) was -0.66 to 0.61 mm (0.06 ± 0.44) for distances and -1.33 to 1.14° (0.06 ± 0.71) for angles. Except for the interincisal angle (p = 0.17) all measurements were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates feasibility of orthodontic treatment planning without radiation exposure based on MRI. High-resolution isotropic MRI datasets can be transformed into lateral cephalograms allowing reliable measurements as applied in orthodontic routine with high concordance to the corresponding measurements on LCR.