Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Addict Res ; 6(1): 8-19, 2000 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10729738

RESUMEN

Fifty-four methadone-maintained patients and 54 healthy controls, matched for age, gender and educational attainment, completed a battery of six cognitive-psychomotor performance tests. Results of previous studies were replicated in four areas. An attention task was performed less well by patients [mean difference more than 0.7 standard deviations (SD)] as was a tachistoscopic perception task (0. 3 SD). On a simple-choice reaction test, patients showed higher speed in decision making and motor reaction as well as an increased number of decision errors (0.3 SD each). Performing a tracking test, patients showed less deviations (0.4 SD) combined with more time needed (0.8 SD). Our data go beyond previous (seemingly inconsistent) research findings by showing that patients did less well by more than 0.6 SD when on higher speed levels. Absolving a test on visual structuring, more patients than controls achieved a 100% accuracy level (52 vs. 30%), but at the same time patients were slower (0.6 SD) than controls. An inferior test performance of patients in methadone maintenance treatment has been confirmed in some areas, especially in attention. However, the fairly moderate size of these effects and the fact that in the majority of measures the observed variance was better explained by sociodemographic features than by group membership lead on the conclusion that belonging to the group of methadone patients alone is not necessarily sufficient to predict an impairment in cognitive-psychomotor skills. To conclude, assessment of fitness for certain tasks or occupations should be done individually for each patient and should take into account comorbidity, including the extent of alcohol and other drug use.


Asunto(s)
Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Solución de Problemas/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Reacción/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 29(6): 212-5, 1996 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8956350

RESUMEN

In a two-week double-blind trial l-methadone and racemic methadone were compared for efficacy in substitution treatment for opiate addicts. Before the trial the twenty-six participants had been on stable doses of l-methadone. Patients with evidence of current serious psychological problems were excluded. Patients were evaluated twice a week using a modified FSUCL, physician's withdrawal checklist, self-rating withdrawal scale, and the Beschwerden-Liste (complaint list) according to von Zerssen. Between addicts continuing on l-methadone (n = 13) and those now receiving racemic methadone (n = 13) there were no statistically significant differences. In particular, patients receiving racemic methadone did not complain more frequently of withdrawal symptoms. In a follow-up period of nine weeks after replacement of l-methadone with racemic methadone, there was also no significant increase in complaints about withdrawal symptoms, although six patients needed an elevation of their daily dosage by at least 20 mg racemic methadone.


Asunto(s)
Metadona/uso terapéutico , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estereoisomerismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...