RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although people with a migration background (MB) have more unmet mental health needs than the general population, patients with a MB are still underrepresented in mental health care services. Provider bias towards these patients has been evidenced repeatedly but its driving factors remain elusive. We assessed the moderating effect of the individual (e.g. age and ethnicity), interpersonal (e.g. healthcare provider trust), and organisational (e.g. perceived workload) factors on general practitioners (GPs) differential decision-making regarding diagnosis, treatment, and referral for a depressed patient with or without a MB. DESIGN: An experimental study was carried out in which GPs were shown one of two video vignettes featuring adult male depressed patients, one with a MB and the other without. Belgian GPs (n = 797, response rate was 13%) had to decide on their diagnosis, treatment, and referral. Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used to analyse the effect of a MB, adding interaction terms for the explanatory variables. RESULTS: Overall, we found that there were ethnic differences in GPs' decisions regarding diagnosis and treatment recommendations. GPs perceived the symptoms of the patient with a MB as less severe (F = 7.68, p < 0.01) and demonstrated a reduced likelihood to prescribe a combination of medical and non-medical treatments (F = 11.55, p < 0.001). Those differences increased in accordance with the GP's age and perceived workload; at an interpersonal level, we found that differences increased when the GP thought the patient was exaggerating his distress. CONCLUSION: This paper showed that lower levels of trust among GPs' towards their migrant patients and high GP workloads contribute to an increased ethnic bias in medical decision-making. This may perpetuate ethnic inequalities in mental health care. Future researchers should develop an intervention to decrease the ethnic inequities in mental health care by addressing GPs' trust in their migrant and ethnic minority patients.
Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Salud Mental , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Etnicidad , Grupos Minoritarios , Medicina Familiar y ComunitariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a lot of evidence for a bidirectional communication between the gut and brain. Dysbiosis and increase intestinal permeability may lead to a systemic low-grade inflammatory response or various neuroactive bacterial metabolite may cross gut barrier. Pro-inflammatory cytokines or bacterial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) are known to pass through blood brain barrier and altered neurotransmitter metabolism or increase production of neurotoxic pathways. In this review we hypothesized that restoring the gut microbiota ecosystem could improve mental disorders. We reviewed literature for human evidence proving clinical relevance of probiotics intake in mental disorders. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We searched literature with keywords "depression" or "major depressive disorder" and "probiotic". We selected randomized control trial and we considered having both outcomes concerning impact on depressive symptoms but also on inflammation biomarkers, microbiota composition, cerebral nervous system or cognition. RESULTS: Seven out of fourteen randomized control trial reported significant improvement on depressive symptoms in patients taking probiotics. Besides improvement in depressive symptoms, we found decrease in inflammatory markers such as IL-6, decrease in serum kynurenine level, changes in microbiota diversity and abundance of species correlated to depressive disorder and higher cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic seems to be secure and more effective on depression when used in supplement to usual antidepressant and in mild to moderate depression. We highlighted positive impact on vulnerability factors prevent further worsening. Probiotics could have anti-inflammatory effect acting on inflammatory markers well known to have a role on pathogenesis of depression. A strong correlation between neuroactive metabolites and a relative abundance of microbiota bacterial species underlined importance to consider the gut-brain axis in mental disorders.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Microbiota , Probióticos , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Inflamación , EncéfaloRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mental health problems have become a major topic of public health these last years, particularly since the pandemic of COVID-19. Primary care givers are confronted with high rates of common mental health problems (CMHPs) in population. This questions healthcare organization and specifically collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and clinical psychologists (CPs). In this paper we aim to review recent literature to identify factors that facilitate or hinder collaboration between GPs and CPs when caring for their patients' CMHPs. METHODS: A non-systematic qualitative literature review was performed, using the PRISMA method. We restricted the review to papers published between 2010 and 2023. RESULTS: We identified 52 papers and after filtering, only 6 were included in the synthesis. Six main themes were identified: barriers to interprofessional collaboration, lack of mutual trust, mutual dissatisfaction with information exchanged, the paradox of professional secrecy, the necessity of a paradigm shift, and conceptual frameworks of collaboration. These themes were discussed to improve collaboration between GPs and CPs. CONCLUSION: This work provides some recommendations to support the development of interprofessional collaboration between GPs and CPs in primary care.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Médicos Generales/psicología , Salud Mental , Investigación Cualitativa , Conducta Cooperativa , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Atención Primaria de Salud , Actitud del Personal de SaludRESUMEN
Populations with a migration background have a higher prevalence of mental health problems than their native counterparts. They are also more likely to have unmet medical needs and are less frequently referred to mental health services. One potential explanation for this is that physicians, such as general practitioners (GPs), may unintentionally discriminate against migrant patients, particularly when they lack humanization. To date, no experimental study has investigated this hypothesis. This paper assesses the influence of humanization on GPs' discriminatory decisions regarding migrant patients with depression. A balanced 2 × 2 factorial experiment was carried out with Belgian GPs (N = 797) who received video-vignettes depicting either a native patient or a migrant patient with depression. Half of the respondents were exposed to a text that humanized the patient by providing more details about the patient's life story. Decisions related to diagnosis, treatment and referral were collected, as well as the time spent on each video and text, and were analysed using ANOVA. Migrant patients' symptoms were judged to be less severe than those of native patients (F = 7.71, p < 0.05). For almost all treatments, the decision was less favourable for the migrant patient. Humanization had little effect on medical decisions. We observed that GPs spent significantly more time on the vignette with the humanization intervention, especially for the migrant patients. The results indicate that ethnic differences in the management of depression persist in primary care. Humanization, however, does not mitigate those differences in medical decisions.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Humanos , Médicos Generales/psicología , Salud Mental , Derivación y Consulta , BélgicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 health crisis has turned the entire health care system and its actors upside down. For interns in general practice (IMGs), it has changed the way they practice medicine on a daily basis, disrupted their training, and highlighted their social responsibility, a factor that predisposes them to practice general medicine. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the health crisis on the anxiety and motivation for general practice of IMGs. METHOD: Cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire (Qualtrics©) distributed by e-mail to IMGs of two French-speaking Belgian universities between 1 and 31 July 2020 following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: In a sample of 188 IMGs, the following variables, considered as significant risk factor for anxiety, were analyzed: psychological distress prior to the lockdown (OR=2.894), having more than 15 daily telephone consultations during the lockdown (OR=2.724), worrying about being affected by COVID-19 (OR=2.892), or deterioration in quality of life (OR=3.335). Conversely, the feeling of practicing in a supportive environment (OR=0.311) is a protective factor against anxiety. Finally, the feeling of social usefulness reinforces the motivation of IMGs for their profession (OR=4.737). CONCLUSION: This study allowed us to better identify the factors of anxiety and motivation for specialization in general practice among IMGs just after the first wave of COVID-19. Awareness of the risk factors for professional distress and how to deal with them should be considered in the university curriculum.
Introduction: La crise sanitaire du COVID-19 a ébranlé l'ensemble du système de soins de santé et des acteurs qui le constitue. Pour les internes en médecine générale (IMG), celle-ci a modifié l'exercice de la pratique médicale quotidienne, perturbé leur formation et mis en exergue leur responsabilité sociale, l'un des facteurs prédisposant à exercer la médecine générale. Objectif: Évaluer l'impact de la crise sanitaire sur l'anxiété et la motivation pour la médecine générale des IMG. Méthode: Étude transversale réalisée par le biais d'un questionnaire en ligne (Qualtrics©) distribué par courrier électronique aux IMG de deux universités belges francophones, entre le 1er et le 31 juillet 2020, à la suite de la première vague de la pandémie du COVID-19. Résultats: Dans un échantillon de 188 IMG, les variables suivantes ont été analysées : la détresse psychologique préalable au confinement (OR=2,894), réaliser plus de 15 consultations téléphoniques journalières durant le confinement (OR=2,724), l'inquiétude d'être affecté par la COVID-19 (OR=2,892) ou la dégradation de la qualité de vie (OR=3,335), agissent comme des facteurs de risque significatifs de l'anxiété. A contrario, le sentiment de pratiquer dans un environnement soutenant (OR=0,311) est un facteur protecteur de l'anxiété. Enfin, le sentiment d'utilité sociale renforce la motivation des IMG pour leur métier de médecin généraliste (OR=4,737). Conclusion: Cette étude a permis de mieux identifier certains facteurs contributifs d'anxiété parmi les IMG et d'évaluer leur motivation pour la spécialisation en médecine générale après la première vague du COVID-19. Une sensibilisation aux facteurs de risque de la détresse professionnelle et aux ressources à déployer pour y faire face devrait être intégrée au programme des facultés.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Motivación , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Medicina Familiar y ComunitariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: General Practitioners (GPs) are the first point of contact for people from ethnic and migrant groups who have health problems. Discrimination can occur in this health care sector. Few studies, however, have investigated implicit and explicit biases in general practice against ethnic and migrant groups. This study, therefore, investigated the extent of implicit ethnic biases and willingness to adapt care to migrant patients among trainee GPs, and the factors involved therein, in order to measure explicit bias and explore a dimension of cultural competence. METHODS: In 2021, data were collected from 207 trainee GPs in the French-speaking part of Belgium. The respondents passed an Implicit Association Test (IAT), a validated tool used to measure implicit biases against ethnic groups. An explicit attitude of willingness to adapt care to diversity, one of the dimensions of cultural competence, was measured using the Hudelson scale. RESULTS: The overwhelming majority of trainee GPs (82.6%, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.88) had implicit preferences for their ingroup to the detriment of ethnic and migrant groups. Overall, the majority of respondents considered it the responsibility of GPs to adapt their attitudes and practices to migrants' needs. More than 50% of trainee GPs, however, considered it the responsibility of migrant patients to adapt to the values and habits of the host country. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the trainee GPs had high to very high levels of implicit ethnic bias and that they were not always willing to adapt care to the values of migrants. We therefore recommend that they are made aware of this bias and we recommend using the IAT and Hudelson scales as educational tools to address ethnic biases in primary care.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Sesgo , Etnicidad , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While many studies have investigated depression risk factors, few attempts have been made to weight, and compare them. Therefore, we conducted a prospective comparison of a sample of subjects suffering from major depressive disorder and a group of healthy subjects. We compared classic risk factors with internal elements such as personality, family dynamics and health locus of control. We also looked for prognostic factors. METHODS: Forty people with major depressive disorder (the MDD group) were randomly assigned to different treatment groups and followed for two years. In parallel, we followed a group of 21 healthy subjects (healthy group). At the beginning of the study, sociodemographic data were recorded and all subjects were asked to complete the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scale, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), and the Family Adaptation and Cohesion Scale (FACES III). During the study, subjects were regularly assessed using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: Of the 23 explanatory variables, 13 were statistically different (p≤0.05): age, gender, number of people living together, income, extravert personality and neuroticism, Internal HLC, Powerful others HLC, Adaptability of the current couple and the family of origin, and Cohesion of the ideal and nuclear family and family of origin. The accumulation of risk factors doubles the chances of suffering from MDD (odds ratio 1.905**). Independent of treatment, among the 13 variables, the first nine explain 34.1% of change in depression measured on the HDS scale (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: While the size of our sample limits the robustness of our results, our study suggests that some risk factors are also prognostic. The respective weights of these factors vary as a function of age group. Finally, some, such as health locus of control, family dynamics or extraversion, can be modified as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Extraversión Psicológica , Humanos , Neuroticismo , Personalidad , Inventario de Personalidad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parental anxiety about young people's use of media has increased with the advent of Generation Alpha. Excessive consumption is assumed to lead to a sedentary lifestyle, psychiatric disorders, overconsumption of sexual content and suicidal behaviour. But are these assumptions valid? METHODS: We supplemented data from the 2014 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study for Belgium with a bibliographical search of online databases (Medline, Scopus, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, PubMed) with the keywords 'adolescent' - 'internet' and 'sedentarity' or 'suicide' or 'family' or 'sex*' or 'porno*' for articles published between 2014 and 2019. We selected 27 original research articles and/ or quantitative or qualitative meta-analyses. RESULTS: Total consumption of different media (television, video games, internet) remained stable until 2010, and significantly increased in 2014. No parallel increase in sedentarity was reported. Controversy continues to surround the quantification of overconsumption, and the definition of 'problematic use'. Nevertheless, it appears that 5% of young people have unusual internet use, and 97.5% of these meet the criteria for a mental disorder. The risk of overconsumption is related to four factors: familial, personality, peer influence and supply. These general factors are supplemented by specific factors related to the abuse of sexual content and suicidal behaviour. For the latter, specific risk factors are the same as for suicidal young people who are not influenced by social media. CONCLUSION: Even if screen time is higher for Generation Alpha, these young people are no more at risk unless they accumulate risk factors. They are also exposed to challenges that researchers have not yet studied in any depth. One question relates to how they can manage their privacy if their parents published, without their consent, photographs of them as children? Another issue is their relationship to knowledge, given that everything they need to know can easily be found online.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Suicidio , Juegos de Video , Adolescente , Bélgica , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de PantallaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Belgium, 82% of the population consumes alcohol occasionally while 10% consume in a way that can be seen as problematic. On a European level, only 8% of the people who can be characterized as having Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) would have consulted professional assistance in the past year. In this context, the KCE (Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre) has addressed multiple recommendations to health professionals to reduce the "treatment gap" concerning the patients' care: (1) encourage screening and preventative interventions, (2) promote the acquirement of communicational and relational competences (3) develop collaborations between professionals. The objective of this article is to better understand their functioning. METHOD: We format a non-systematic literature review concerning these recommendations. RESULTS: The implementation of these Brief Interventions programs in primary care is relevant due to the moderately positive impact on the frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption but both the quality of the therapeutic relationship and collaboration with the care network would optimize Brief Interventions. The quality of the therapeutic relationship alone appears to have an impact on therapeutic outcome. CONCLUSION: Training concerning patient-professional relationship is necessary to maximize the effectiveness of BIs.
Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Alcoholismo , Atención Primaria de Salud , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Bélgica , Humanos , Tamizaje MasivoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: These last years adolescents in transition to young adulthood (ATYA) have become a new matter of research. This population encounter specific issues and challenges regarding their mental health particularly when they have attained age boundaries and deal with the issue of transition from child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) to adult mental health services (AMHS). Many key questions regarding how to sustain continuity of mental health care for ATYA during transition remain. The aim of this paper is to review recent literature in the domain to identify dimensions that should be considered to improve ATYA transition from CAMHS to AMHS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A qualitative literature review was performed in Scopus-Elsevier database using the PRISMA method as reporting guidelines. Only papers discussing dimensions involved in the transition process from CAMHS to AMHS were considered. We restricted the review to researches published between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: We identified 85 potential researches, after filtering; only 10 articles were finally included in the qualitative synthesis of the literature. Five main dimensions were identified: patient, professional, organization, policy, and ethic related. Those dimensions should be considered in order to improve ATYA transition process out of CAMHS to AMHS. CONCLUSION: This work contributes to identify principal dimensions that should be considered by mental health professionals and organizations in order to improve ATYA transition from CAMHS to AMHS.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Adolescente , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Transición a la Atención de Adultos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Salud Mental , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Some behaviors or psychiatric conditions seem to be inherited from parents or explain by family environment. We hypothesized interactions between epigenetic processes, inflammatory response and gut microbiota with family surroundings or environmental characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We searched in literature interactions between epigenetic processes and psychiatric disorders with a special interest for environmental factors such as traumatic or stress events, family relationships and also gut microbiota. We searched on Pubmed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and Sciencedirect articles with the keywords psychiatric disorders, epigenome, microbiome and family relationships. RESULTS: Some gene polymorphisms interact with negative environment and lead to psychiatric disorders. Negative environment is correlated with different epigenetic modifications in genes implicated in mental health. Gut microbiota diversity affect host epigenetic. Animal studies showed evidences for a transgenerational transmission of epigenetic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that epigenetic mediate gene-environment interactions and psychiatric disorders. Several environmental characteristics such as traumatic life events, family adversity, psychological stress or internal environment such as gut microbiota diversity and diet showed an impact on epigenetic. These epigenetic modifications are also correlated with neurophysiological, inflammatory or hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulations.
Asunto(s)
Epigénesis Genética , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Trastornos Mentales , Animales , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisario , Trastornos Mentales/genética , Trastornos Mentales/microbiología , Sistema Hipófiso-SuprarrenalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In a two-year study, we compared the efficacy of noradrenergic and serotonergic antidepressants with and without the addition of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subjects suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD). In this article we examine the influence of the health locus of control, family relationships and personality traits on the progress of MDD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 40 people with MDD (MDD group) were randomly assigned to the different treatment groups. They were followed in parallel with a group of 20 'healthy' subjects (HG). At the beginning of the study, sociodemographic data were collected, and patients were asked to complete the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scale, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), and the Family Adaptation and Cohesion Scale (FACES III). During the study subjects were regularly assessed using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS), the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). RESULTS: Regardless of the type of treatment, physical health is the best predictor of variation at two years in the MDD group; 45% of variance is explained by a linear regression model that includes three variables from the MHLC, FACES III and NEO-FFI scales. Similarly, 40% of CGI and 24% of HDS variance is predicted. These explanatory variables are statistically less powerful in the MDD group than the HG group. CONCLUSION: While drug treatment is a determinant in changes on the HDS, CGI and SF12 scales, factors such as family relationships, MHLC or personality are important covariates of these changes. The question remains whether we can influence these covariates to improve the response to antidepressants.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Relaciones Familiares , Control Interno-Externo , Humanos , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this paper we focus on adolescents in transition towards young adulthood (ATYA). We know from international studies that the transition process makes adolescents vulnerable to mental illness. However, little is known about Belgian ATYA mental-health status. Nor are risk factors associated with their mental illness understood, in particular with regard to depressive and anxiety disorder. The aim of this study is (1) to discuss evolution in time of prevalence of depressive disorder (DD) and anxiety disorder (AD) among Belgian ATYA and (2), to identify risk factors associated with these disorders among ATYA. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data was extracted from the Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS), which is a cross-sectional population survey, carried out in 2001, 2004, 2008, and 2013. Information about the population's background characteristics, health services utilization, health behaviours and mental health status were extracted and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: ATYA prevalence of DD and AD was higher in 2013 in comparison with previous years. These changes were significant only for DD (F=4.466, p=0.004). In contrast with younger adolescents, among ATYA odds of DD were 28.2% higher (OR 1.282, 95% CI 0.967-1.698, p=0.084) and, odds of AD were 55.2% higher (OR 1.552, 95% CI 1.137-2.119, p=0.006). For ATYA, a poor quality of social support was the most predictive factor of DD (OR 11.187, 95% CI 5.530-22.629, p<0.0001) and AD (OR 6.238, 95% CI 2.845-13.676, p<0.0001); whereas, having a paid job was the most protective factor with regard to DD (OR 0.282, 95% CI 0.169-0.470, p<0.0001) and AD (OR 0.552, 95% CI 0.330-0.924, p<0.024). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of mental illness among Belgian ATYA appears to worsen in time. In comparison with younger adolescents, ATYA are more vulnerable to anxiety disorders. Adverse and protective risk factors were identified and discussed in a way to improve access, continuity and mental healthcare pathways for Belgian ATYA.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Bélgica/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders may be correlated with a low-grade systemic inflammation but the origin of this inflammatory response remains unclear and both genetics and environmental factors seems to be concerned. Recent researches observed that gut microbiota seems to have an impact on the brain and immune processes. METHOD: We review recent literature to a better understanding of how microbiota interacts with brain, immunity and psychiatric disorders. We search on Pubmed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and Sciencedirect articles with the keywords "gastrointestinal microbiota" and "mental disorders" or "psychological stress". RESULTS: We showed links between gut microbiota and brain-gut axis regulation, immune and endocrine system activity, neurophysiological changes, behavior variations and neuropsychiatric disorders. Communications between brain and gut are bidirectional via neural, endocrine and immune pathway. Microbiota dysbiosis and increase gut permeability with subsequent immune challenges seems to be the source of the chronic mild inflammation associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. Repeated immune or stress events early in life may lead to neurodevelopmental disorders or sickness behavior later in life. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological stress impact gut microbiota with subsequent immune activation leading to neurodevelopmental disorders or sickness behavior and altering neurophysiology and reactivity to stress or lifestyle.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/inmunología , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Inflamación/inmunología , Inflamación/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/inmunología , Trastornos Mentales/microbiología , Disbiosis/inmunología , Disbiosis/microbiología , Disbiosis/psicología , Sistema Endocrino/inmunología , Sistema Endocrino/metabolismo , Sistema Endocrino/microbiología , Humanos , Inflamación/microbiología , Neuropsiquiatría , Estrés Psicológico/inmunología , Estrés Psicológico/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In a two-year study we compared the efficacy of noradrenergic (duloxetine D) and serotonergic (escitalopram E) antidepressants with and without the addition of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subjects suffering from a major depressive episode (MDE). The results showed that the D + ASA (DASA) group improved more rapidly than the E + placebo (EP) subgroup. In particular, Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) scores improved as early as two months, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores improved at five months, and remission rates were better. In the course of this study, we also investigated the role of the therapeutic relationship (alliance) on both the progress of the MDE, and patients' mental and physical health. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 40 people suffering from an MDE were randomly assigned to treatment groups. At the beginning of the study sociodemographic data were collected, and the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) was completed. During the study, patients were regularly assessed using the HDS, CGI and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: Subgroup comparisons revealed that HAQ scores are not correlated with HAD scores, but a correlation was found with remission rates (r=0.316*). Similarly, at all times, HAQ scores were correlated with physical health (p<0.05), which is in turn correlated with HDS and CGI scores. CONCLUSION: Physical health is linked to the level of depression. While the alliance with the patient is not directly correlated with the intensity of depression, is it correlated with their physical condition and its improvement. For patients, improving their physical health appears to be more important than improving their mental health. These observations must be confirmed.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Estado de Salud , Alianza Terapéutica , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are medico-psycho-social indications to apprehend the alcohol use disorder (AUD) as a chronic problem for which a continuous care is necessary. The perception of continuity of care is also associated with positive outcomes on the patient's health. Communication between caregivers is essential to maintain a good continual care. In order to put patients back into the center of care, we asked them the question: "why should the psychiatric department (PD) and general physicians (GP) should communicate about AUD patients"? SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After a week of hospitalization for alcoholic withdrawal, we used a qualitative approach with 4 open questions to explore AUD patients' point of view (N=17) about the best way of communication between psychiatrists and GP to improve care continuity. The data collection was carried out in the psychiatric department of the University Hospital of Mont-Godinne, Belgium. RESULTS: AUD patients consider that the GP is the first line actor that will be consulted after hospitalization and have a privileged relationship with him. These arguments justify him being informed. Concerning these patients, communication is useful to have a continuous treatment and project care, for purposes of symptoms' evolution follow-up and so as to help the GP to understand them better to follow the evolution of symptoms and to help the GP to understand them better. CONCLUSION: From AUD patients' point of view, communication between psychiatric department and the GP is useful for a perspective of continuity of care at discharge from the hospital. This communication seems to be at the service of the GP and his patient rather than for the psychiatrist himself. Mainly because of the GP's role as a privileged first-line care, but also thanks to the specific relationship relating him to his patient.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Médicos Generales , Psiquiatría , Bélgica , Humanos , Relaciones InterprofesionalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Denial of pregnancy is an issue that is often discovered a posteriori with sometimes dramatic complications. Denial of pregnancy is considered partial when the woman becomes aware of the pregnancy after the fifth month before delivery. The populations studied were heterogeneous, which made it impossible to establish a standard algorithm of the treatment and support of a discovery of partial denial of pregnancy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Based on a literature review and a discussion of partial denial of pregnancy case and the consequential treatment with a five-year follow-up, the global management recommendations need consideration in the case of partial denial of pregnancy. RESULTS: The reported case confirmed the significance of the trauma caused by the discovery of pregnancy in a patient in denial, but also showed that this trauma can extend to caregivers concerned by the treatment. CONCLUSION: Continuous training of all caregivers for denial of pregnancy is essential even if the issue may be considered infrequent. Contraception, prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and the importance of gynecological follow-up must be systematically addressed in a medical consultation. A standard algorithm for the treatment of partial denial is difficult to establish, but the rapid mobilization of a multidisciplinary team or hospitalization is recommended for the announcement of the diagnosis as well as personalized support during ultrasounds. The establishment of a relationship of trust remains the major issue.
Asunto(s)
Negación en Psicología , Diabetes Mellitus , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Ideación Suicida , Anticoncepción , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In previous studies we showed the interaction between depression and immunity. We observed that psychological stress seems to be important in this association. In this review we try to understand if psychological stress and immunity have similar or specific impact on the other psychiatric disorders. More generally we review literature to understand if specific immune alterations exist between the main psychiatric diagnoses. METHOD: We studied the literature in search of variabilities between the different psychiatric disorders in terms of immunity especially inflammation. We search on Pubmed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and Sciencedirect articles with the keywords immunity or inflammation and depression, anxious disorders and schizophrenia. RESULTS: Prevalence of inflammation in psychiatric disorders seems to be between 21 to 42%. Psychiatric disorders are correlated with elevated levels of CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1ß and TNFα) and anti-inflammatory factors (TGF ß, IL-10, sIL-2, IL-1RA). IL-6 in childhood were associated with subsequent risk of depression or psychotic disorders in early adulthood and in a dose dependent manner. DISCUSSIONS: We found similar immune processes through the different disorders. Variations in cytokines levels seem paralleling various stages of the illness and treatment. Inflammatory markers are linked with severity and resistance to treatment and with subsequent risk of disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Some inflammatory parameters could be considered as risk factor, severity, resistance, trait or state markers of a psychiatric disorder. Other studies are necessary to a better understanding of clinical implications of this heterogeneity.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Trastorno Depresivo , Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Niño , Citocinas/metabolismo , Trastorno Depresivo/inmunología , Humanos , Trastornos Psicóticos/inmunología , Esquizofrenia/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among asylum seekers (AS), mental health conditions are highly prevalent. However this population group has poor access to adequate services and frequently incurs discontinuity of mental healthcare. Many factors explain discontinuity of mental healthcare for asylum seekers. The aim of this study is to evaluate if facilitation of care for AS decreases healthcare provider stereotypes of this population and improves their continuity of care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: General practitioners (GPs) and mental health professionals (MHPs) were invited to participate in a vignette study, presenting an AS patient manifesting post-traumatic stress symptoms. We randomly manipulated the context of the clinical vignette to create two experimental conditions: facilitated care versus non-facilitated care. In each condition, we measured participants' stereotypes and continuity of care. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of participant's type of stereotypes on continuity of care (F=2.87, p=0.035). However, we found no effect of condition (facilitated vs. non facilitated care) on stereotypes (F=0.11, p=0.95), nor on continuity of care (F=0.35, p=0.55). Furthermore, there was a significant effect of profession (GPs vs MHPs) on continuity of care (F=11.43, p=0.001). Participants' number of consultations per week (F=10.33, p=0.002) and their gender (F=3.69, p=0.030) both have a significant effect on continuity of care. CONCLUSION: Among healthcare providers, we found that "admiration" stereotypes were associated more with continuity of care. Paradoxically, continuity of mental healthcare was better among GPs compared to MHPs. Thus, improvement of continuity of mental healthcare for AS among MHPs should be investigated in further studies.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Médicos Generales , Trastornos Mentales , Refugiados , Estereotipo , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Distribución Aleatoria , Derivación y Consulta , Refugiados/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antidepressant medication efficacy remains a major research challenge. Here, we explored four questions: whether noradrenergic antidepressants are more effective than serotonergic antidepressants; whether the addition of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) changes antidepressant efficacy; whether the long-term efficacy differs depending on the antidepressant and the addition of ASA; and whether serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are clinically informative. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a two-year study, forty people with major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to groups that received an SSRI (escitalopram) or an SNRI (duloxetine), each group received concomitant ASA (100 mg) or a placebo. Sociodemographic data were recorded and patients under went regular assessments with the Hamilton depression scale (HDS) and clinical global impression (CGI) scale. Serum levels of BDNF were measured four times per year. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two antidepressants or between antidepressant treatment with and without ASA. However, subgroup comparisons revealed that the duloxetine + ASA (DASA) subgroup showed a more rapid improvement in HDS score as early as 2 months (t=-3.114, p=0.01), in CGI score at 5 months (t=-2.119, p=0.05), and a better remission rate (χ2=6.296, p 0.012) than the escitalopram + placebo (EP) subgroup. Serum BDNF before treatment was also higher in the DASA subgroup than in the EP subgroup (t=3.713; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: This suggest two hypotheses: either a noradrenergic agent combined with ASA is more effective in treating depression than a serotonergic agent alone, or the level of serum BDNF before treatment is a precursor marker of the response to antidepressants. Further research is needed to test these hypotheses.