Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(10): 659, 2024 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39271541

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Social eating (SE) is a corner stone of daily living activities, quality of life (QoL), and aging well. In addition to feeding functional disorders, patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) face individual and social psychological distress. In this aging population, we intended to better assess the influence of age on these challenges, and the role of self-stigmatization limiting SE in patients with and beyond HNC. METHODS: This was an exploratory multicenter cross-sectional mixed method study. Eligibility criteria were adults diagnosed with various non-metastatic HNC, before, during, or until 5 years after treatment. SE disorders were explored with the Performance Status Scale Public Eating rate (PSS-HN PE). In the quantitative part of the study, SE habits, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Body Image Scale (FACT-MBIS) and specific to HNC (FACT-HN35) were also filled in by the patients. In the qualitative study, the semi-structured interview guide was drawn out to explore stigma, especially different dimensions of self-stigmatization. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, mean age 64.7 years, 23.2% of female. One-third (n = 35) of patients had an abnormal PSS-HN PE rate < 100. Younger patients had more often an impaired Normalcy of Diet mean (70.4 vs 82.7, p = .0498) and PE rates (76 vs 86.9, p = .0622), but there was no difference between age subgroups in MBIS nor FACT-HN scores. Seventy patients (72.2%) found SE and drinking « important¼ to « extremely important¼ in their daily life. The qualitative study reported self-stigmatization in two older patients and strategies they have developed to cope with in their behaviors of SE. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that SE remains of high concern in patients with and beyond HNC. Even in older patients experiencing less often functional feeding disorders, body image changes and SE issues are as impaired as in younger patients and need to be addressed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Anciano , Francia , Factores de Edad , Estigma Social , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen Corporal/psicología , Conducta Alimentaria/psicología
2.
Oncotarget ; 9(66): 32680-32689, 2018 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30220974

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: 454 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma were accidentally overexposed to radiation in Epinal hospital, France, between August 1999 and January 2007. We aimed toevaluate whether radiation-induced CD4 or CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA) correlates with the severity of radiation toxicity. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2013, all patients who received more than 108% of the prescribed radiation dose, after correction of the treatment plan, were convened, and blood was sampled at 6-months follow-up. Maximal Digestive toxicity (MDT) and maximal urinary toxicity (MUT) were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v3.0 scale. RILA was assessed using flow cytometry. RESULTS: 245 patients were included in our study. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the MDT and MUT reached grade 3-4 in 37 patients and 56 patients, respectively. Patients with prostatectomy exhibited a statistically higher grade of MUT compared with those treated with definitive radiotherapy (p=0.03). The median RILA values were 11.8% and 15.3% for CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes, respectively. We found no significant correlation between CD4 or CD8 RILA and either MDT or MUT. CONCLUSION: RILA does not correlate with the inter-individual variation in MDT or MUT in the largest cohort of patients overexposed to radiation. The magnitude of the overdosage probably overrides biological predictors of toxicity, including individual radiosensitivity.

3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 95(4): 1244-53, 2016 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354131

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify the prognostic role of adjuvant abdominal radiation therapy (RT) on oncologic outcomes as a part of multimodal treatment in the management of desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) and to determine its impact according to the quality of surgical resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated for primary abdominal DSRCT in 8 French centers from 1991 to 2014 were included. Patients were retrospectively staged into 3 groups: group A treated with adjuvant RT after cytoreductive surgery, group B without RT after cytoreductive surgery, and group C by exclusive chemotherapy. Peritoneal progression-free survival (PPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. We also performed a direct comparison between groups A and B to evaluate RT after cytoreductive surgery. Radiation therapy was also evaluated according to completeness of surgery: complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS) or incomplete cytoreductive surgery (ICS). RESULTS: Thirty-seven (35.9%), thirty-six (34.9%), and thirty (28.0%) patients were included in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Three-year OS was 61.2% (range, 41.0%-76.0%), 37.6% (22.0%-53.1%), and 17.3% (6.3%-32.8%) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Overall survival, PPFS, and PFS differed significantly among the 3 groups (P<.001, P<.001, and P<.001, respectively). Overall survival and PPFS were higher in group A (RT group) compared with group B (no RT group) (P=.045 and P=.006, respectively). Three-year PPFS was 23.8% (10.3%-40.4%) for group A and 12.51% (4.0%-26.2%) for group B. After CCS, RT improved PPFS (P=.024), but differences in OS and PFS were not significant (P=.40 and P=.30, respectively). After ICS, RT improved OS (P=.044). A trend of PPFS and PFS increase was observed, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.073 and P=.076). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT as part of multimodal treatment seems to confer oncologic benefits for patients treated for abdominal DSRCT after cytoreductive surgery and perioperative chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/radioterapia , Tumor Desmoplásico de Células Pequeñas Redondas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Abdominales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Tumor Desmoplásico de Células Pequeñas Redondas/mortalidad , Tumor Desmoplásico de Células Pequeñas Redondas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Radiother Oncol ; 103(3): 314-21, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22633813

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the association between dosimetric/clinical parameters and gastrointestinal/urinary grade 2-4 side effects in cervix cancer patients treated with 3D pulse dose rate brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-two patients received brachytherapy associated with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for 266 of them; 236 patients underwent surgery. The doses for the most exposed 2, and 0.1 cm(3) (D(2cc) and D(0.1cc)) volumes of the rectum and bladder as well as bladder ICRU point dose (D(ICRU)) were converted into isoeffective doses in 2-Gy fractions. The clinical parameters analyzed were: age, smoking habits, arteritis, diabetes, previous pelvic surgery, FIGO stage, nodal status, pathology, pelvic surgery, EBRT and chemotherapy. Side effects were prospectively assessed using the CTCAEv3.0. Cutoff dose levels were defined separately for patients treated with EBRT and brachytherapy (Group 1) and with preoperative brachytherapy (Group 2). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 23.4months. In Group 1 a significant predictive value of rectum D(0.1cc) and D(2cc), bladder D(0.1cc) and D(ICRU) for gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity was found using as cutoff 83, 68, 109 and 68Gy(α)(/)(ß)(3). In Group 2 a significant predictive value of bladder D(0.1cc), D(2cc) and D(ICRU) for urinary toxicity was found using as cutoff 141, 91 and 67Gy(α)(/)(ß)(3), but not for the rectum D(0.1cc) and D(2cc); smoking had a significant predictive value on urinary toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For patients treated with brachytherapy and EBRT, rectum D(0.1cc) and D(2cc) and bladder D(0.1cc) and D(ICRU) had a predictive value for toxicity. For patients treated with preoperative brachytherapy, bladder D(0.1cc), D(2cc) and D(ICRU) and smoking had a predictive value for urinary toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Imagenología Tridimensional , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Sistema Urinario/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA