Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Adult Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study in a Real-World Cohort/GUARDIANS Project.

INTRODUCTION: Combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care (SOC) for treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the RW safety and efficacy of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in mRCC patients. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from twelve cancer centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with advanced or mRCC were eligible. The investigator-based objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated from the start of the treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots were utilized where appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 96 eligible patients (66.6% male) with a median age of 66.0 years were included. The most common histology was clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) in 63.4% (n = 61). A prior nephrectomy was performed in 60.4% (n = 58). ECOG 0-1 was 68.8% (n = 66). A partial response was documented in 43.8% of patients (n = 42), a stable disease in 32.3% (n = 31), and a progressive disease in 8.3% (n = 8) as the best overall response. Response data were not evaluable in 13.5% (n = 13). The median follow-up time was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.0-15.3). The PFS rate at 6 months was 89.8% in the overall population (86.8% for ccRCC; 90.0% for non-ccRCC). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 82.3% (n = 79) for all grades and 41.7% (n = 40) for grades 3-5. Elevated liver enzymes (34.4%), diarrhea (31.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (29.2%) were the three most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort of mRCC patients, the application of cabozantinib plus nivolumab was shown to be safe and feasible. Our data support the use of cabozantinib plus nivolumab as a first-line standard therapy in mRCC patients. Major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up time of our study.

Preclinical investigation of neoatherosclerosis in magnesium-based bioresorbable scaffolds versus thick-strut drug-eluting stents.

AIMS: Neoatherosclerosis is a frequent finding after implantation of permanent metallic stents. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) are considered to reduce the incidence of neoatherosclerosis owing to their dissolution and consequent vascular restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the formation of neoatherosclerosis between magnesium-based BRS and thick-strut metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) in a rabbit model of neoatherosclerosis and in proportion to the effect of high-dose statin medication. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fully bioresorbable magnesium scaffolds (BRS, n=45) and thick-strut permanent metallic DES of equivalent geometry and design (n=45) were implanted into the iliac arteries of New Zealand White rabbits (n=45) following endothelial balloon injury and exposure to a cholesterol diet. Endothelialisation was assessed in 12 animals after 35 days using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), showing significantly enhanced re-endothelialisation above struts in the BRS (n=13) compared to DES (n=10). Eleven (11) animals were terminated for baseline assessment after 91 days while the remaining 22 animals were randomised to receive high-dose statin treatment (3 mg/kg) or placebo. BRS-treated vessels showed a significant reduction in foam cell infiltration as a sign of early neoatherosclerosis by histology and OCT when compared to thick-strut DES-treated vessels. Statin treatment resulted in significant reduction of foam cell infiltration in BRS and DES by histology. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest reduced neoatherosclerosis formation in magnesium-based BRS relative to thick-strut DES. High-dose statin treatment may be a promising measure to reduce neoatherosclerosis progression, both on its own and in synergy with site-targeted device-based treatment.

Neoatherosclerosis in Patients With Coronary Stent Thrombosis: Findings From Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging (A Report of the PRESTIGE Consortium).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess neoatherosclerosis in a registry of prospectively enrolled patients presenting with stent thrombosis using optical coherence tomography. BACKGROUND: In-stent neoatherosclerosis was recently identified as a novel disease manifestation of atherosclerosis after coronary stent implantation. METHODS: Angiography and intravascular optical coherence tomography were used to investigate etiologic factors of neoatherosclerosis in patients presenting with stent thrombosis >1 year after implantation (very late stent thrombosis [VLST]). Clinical data were collected according to a standardized protocol. Optical coherence tomographic acquisitions were analyzed in a core laboratory. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the formation of neoatherosclerosis and plaque rupture as a function of time. RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography was performed in 134 patients presenting with VLST. A total of 58 lesions in 58 patients with neoatherosclerosis were compared with 76 lesions in 76 patients without neoatherosclerosis. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In-stent plaque rupture was the most frequent cause (31%) in all patients presenting with VLST. In patients with neoatherosclerosis, in-stent plaque rupture was identified as the cause of VLST in 40 cases (69%), whereas uncovered stent struts (n = 22 [29%]) was the most frequent cause in patients without neoatherosclerosis. Macrophage infiltration was significantly more frequent in optical coherence tomographic frames with plaque rupture compared with those without (50.2% vs. 22.2%; p < 0.0001), whereas calcification was more often observed in frames without plaque rupture (17.2% vs. 4%; p < 0.0001). Implantation of a drug-eluting stent was significantly associated with the formation of neoatherosclerosis (p = 0.02), whereas previous myocardial infarction on index percutaneous coronary intervention was identified as a significant risk factor for plaque rupture in patients with neoatherosclerosis (p = 0.003). No significant difference was observed in thrombus composition between patients with or without neoatherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: Neoatherosclerosis was frequently observed in patients with VLST. Implantation of a drug-eluting stent was significantly associated with neoatherosclerosis formation. In-stent plaque rupture was the prevailing pathological mechanism and often occurred in patients with neoatherosclerosis and previous myocardial infarction at index percutaneous coronary intervention. Increased macrophage infiltration heralded plaque vulnerability in our study and might serve as an important indicator.