A phase I trial of LHC165 single agent and in combination with spartalizumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: LHC165 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 agonist that generates an effective tumor antigen-specific T-cell adaptive immune response as well as durable antitumor responses. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LHC165 single agent (SA) ± spartalizumab [PDR001; anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)] in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation/expansion study, patients received LHC165 SA 100-600 µg biweekly through intratumoral (IT) injection and LHC165 600 µg biweekly + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W through intravenous (IV) infusion. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled: 21 patients received LHC165 SA, and 24 patients received LHC165 + spartalizumab. The median duration of exposure was 8 weeks (range 2-129 weeks). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Recommended dose expansion was established as LHC165 600 µg biweekly as SA and in combination with spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (22.2%), pruritus (13.3%), chills (11.1%), and asthenia (4.4%). The only serious AE (SAE) suspected to be related to the study drug was grade 3 pancreatitis (n = 1). Across all tumor types, overall response rate and disease control were 6.7% and 17.8%, respectively. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) and immune-related PFS was 1.7 months. LHC165 serum PK demonstrated an initial rapid release followed by a slower release due to continued release of LHC165 from the injection site. CONCLUSIONS: LHC165 demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability both as SA and in combination with spartalizumab, and evidence of limited antitumor activity was seen in adult patients with relapsed/refractory or metastatic solid tumors.

Quality control of DL,CO instruments in global clinical trials.

High inter- and intra-laboratory variability exists for the single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D(L,CO)) test. To detect small changes in diffusing capacity in multicentre clinical trials, accurate measurements are essential. The present study assessed whether regular D(L,CO) simulator testing maintained or improved instrument accuracy and reduced variability in multicentre trials. The 125 pulmonary function testing laboratories that participated in clinical trials for AIR(R) Inhaled Insulin validated and monitored the accuracy of their D(L,CO) measuring devices using a D(L,CO) simulator, which creates known target values for any device. Devices measuring a simulated D(L,CO) different from target by >3 mL.min-1.mmHg(-1) failed testing and were serviced. Device accuracy was assessed over time and with respect to differences in several variables. Initially, 31 (25%) laboratories had a D(L,CO) device that failed simulator testing. After fixing or replacing devices, 124 (99%) laboratories had passing devices. The percentage of failed tests significantly decreased over time. Differences in geographical region, device type, breath-hold time, temperature and pressure were not associated with meaningful differences in D(L,CO) device accuracy. Regular diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide simulator testing allows pulmonary function testing laboratories to maintain the accuracy of their diffusing capacity measurements, leading to reduced variability across laboratories in multicentre clinical trials.