A nomogram for distinguishing benign and malignant parotid gland tumors using clinical data and preoperative blood markers: development and validation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to construct and validate a nomogram that incorporated clinical data and preoperative blood markers to differentiate BPGTs from MPGTs more efficiently and at low cost. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent parotidectomy and histopathological diagnosis at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2013 to June 2022. Subjects were randomly divided into training and validation sets with a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to select the most relevant features from 19 variables and built a nomogram using logistic regression. We evaluated the model's performance using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, clinical decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve analysis (CICA). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 644 patients, of whom 108 (16.77%) had MPGTs. The nomogram included four features: current smoking status, pain/tenderness, peripheral facial paralysis, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). The optimal cut-off value for the nomogram was 0.17. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the nomogram were 0.748 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.689-0.807) and 0.754 (95% CI = 0.636-0.872) in the training and validation sets, respectively. The nomogram also showed good calibration, high accuracy, moderate sensitivity, and acceptable specificity in both sets. The DCA and CICA demonstrated that the nomogram had significant net benefits for a wide range of threshold probabilities (0.06-0.88 for the training set; 0.06-0.57 and 0.73-0.95 for the validation set). CONCLUSION: The nomogram based on clinical characteristics and preoperative blood markers was a reliable tool for discriminating BPGTs from MPGTs preoperatively.

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of thyroid gland: 11 case reports and a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Primary squamous cell carcinoma of thyroid gland (PSCCT) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor associated with a poor prognosis. Due to the rare case, there is a knowledge gap on the features of PSCCT. There is limited understanding of the treatment and molecular biology of this tumor. More genomic work and relevant perspective work need to be done. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical information of patients with PSCCT diagnosed from December 2009 to December 2020 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. In addition, we conducted an electronic search of the paper in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases by recently updated articles. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were only 11 patients met the study's inclusion criteria in our institution. The patients ranged in age from 25 to 68 years old and female preponderance (M:F = 1:1.7). The median survival time was 6 months, and 1-year survival rate was 33.3%. Fifty-three patients' individual data from 45 articles were selected for analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years and female preponderance (M:F = 1:2.5). The commonest complaint was the anterior neck mass (77.3%), followed by hoarseness (32.1%). The median survival time was 9 months, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rate was 39.8%, 33.7%, and 26.9%, respectively. The log-rank method shows that age, tumor size, lymph node status, M stage, surgical range, and tracheal status were the relevant factors affecting the prognosis. In contrast, gender, treatment modality, and resection margin were not prognostic factors. On multivariable analysis, age and M stage were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: The median overall survival was 6-9 months of PSCCT. Age and M stage are predictors of PSSCT.

Effects of sarpogrelate hydrochloride on peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate hydrochloride by comparing the effects of sarpogrelate with conventional treatment on the improvement of symptoms in PAD patients. METHODS: The search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library database, CNKI, CBM for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) before January 1st, 2019. Inclusion and exclusion of studies, assessment of quality, outcome measures, data extraction and synthesis were completed by two reviewers independently. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Totally, 12 eligible RCTs were included in our analysis. Comparing the results of sarpogrelate group and control group, sarpogrelate significantly improved ankle-brachial index (ABI) levels (SMD = 0.05, [95%CI 0.20 to 0.74, P = .0005]), dorsalis pedis artery blood flow (MD = 0.16, [95%CI 0.09 to 0.23, P < .001]) and pain-free walking distance (PFWD) (MD = 201.86, [95%CI 9.34 to 394.38, P = .04]). The pooled analysis showed that a significant decrease in hsCRP (MD = -0.57, [95%CI -1.12 to -0.02, P = .04]) and IL-6 (MD = 1.48,[95%CI 0.39 to 2.56, P = .008]) was observed in the sarpogrelate treatment. CONCLUSION: Sarpogrelate was effective for improving the symptoms of PAD and showed good tolerability without significant adverse events.

Clinical outcomes of BRAF plus MEK inhibition in melanoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is a potentially fatal malignancy with poor prognosis. Several recent studies have demonstrated that combination therapy of BRAF and MEK inhibition achieved better curative effect and appeared less toxic effects. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety between BRAF inhibition plus MEK inhibition combination therapy and BRAF inhibition monotherapy in melanoma patients. METHODS: We performed the search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2010 to January 2019. Inclusion and exclusion of studies, assessment of quality, outcome measures, data extraction, and synthesis were independently accomplished by two reviewers. Revman 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Totally, seven randomized controlled trials involving 3146 patients met our inclusion criteria. Comparing the results of combination therapy and monotherapy, combination therapy significantly improved OS (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.19; P < 0.00001), ORR (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.28, 1.45; P < 0.00001), PFS (RR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52, 0.63; P < 0.00001) and reduced deaths (RR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69, 0.88; P < 0.0001). Skin-related adverse events such as hyperkeratosis, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma were less compared with monotherapy. However, gastrointestinal events like nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were at a higher frequency. CONCLUSION: Doublet BRAF and MEK inhibition achieved better survival outcomes over single-agent BRAF inhibition and occurred less skin-related events, but gastrointestinal events were more in combination therapy.