Functionally dependent status is an independent predictor for worse perioperative outcomes following craniotomy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a medical emergency, and functional status is often a predictor of adverse outcomes perioperatively. Patients with different functional statuses may have different perioperative outcomes during surgery for aSAH. This study retrospectively examines the effect of functional status on specific perioperative outcomes in patients receiving craniotomy for aSAH. Methods: Patients with aSAH who underwent neurosurgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes (ICD10, I60; ICD9, 430) in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2021. Subjects were stratified into two study groups: functionally dependent and functionally independent, based on their documented functional status on NSQIP. Significant preoperative differences were present between groups so a multivariable regression was performed between functionally dependent and independent patients. The 30-day perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. Perioperative outcomes included death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiac complications, stroke, wound complications, renal complications, sepsis, clot formation, pulmonary complications, return to the operating room, operation time >4 h, length of stay longer than 7 days, discharge not to home, and bleeding. Results: For aSAH patients receiving craniotomy repair, functionally dependent patients had significantly greater rates of MACE, cardiac complications, sepsis, pulmonary complications, and discharge not to home compared to functionally independent patients. Conclusion: This study shows specific perioperative variables influenced by dependent functional status when treating aSAH through craniotomy, thus leading to a more complicated postoperative course. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings among the specific variables that we analyzed.

Alcohol use disorder is associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in type A aortic dissection repair: a population-based study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015-2020.

BACKGROUND: While alcohol consumption is implicated in the development of aortic dissection, the impact of alcohol use disorder (AUD) on the outcomes of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair is still largely unexplored. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive, population-based analysis of effect of AUD on in-hospital outcomes following TAAD repair using National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer database in the United States. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAAD repair were identified in National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status between patients with and without AUD were matched by a 1:3 propensity-score matching. In-hospital outcomes were examined. RESULTS: There were 220 patients with AUD who underwent TAAD repair. Meanwhile, 4062 non-AUD patients went under TAAD repair, where 646 of them were matched to all AUD patients. After propensity-score matching, AUD patients had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (7.76% vs 13.31%, P = 0.03) while there was no difference in transfer-in status or time from admission to operation. However, patients with AUD had a higher rate of respiratory complications (27.40% vs 19.66%, P = 0.02) and a longer hospital length of stay (16.20 ± 11.61 vs 11.72 ± 1.69 days, P = 0.01). All other in-hospital outcomes were comparable between AUD and non-AUD patients. CONCLUSION: AUD patients had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality but a higher rate of respiratory complications and a longer LOS. These findings can provide insights into preoperative risk stratification of these patients. Nonetheless, reasons underlying the lower mortality rate in AUD patients and their long-term prognosis require further investigation.

Preoperative Congestive Heart Failure Is Associated with Higher 30-Day Myocardial Infarction and Pneumonia after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with higher postoperative mortality and complications in noncardiac surgery. However, postoperative outcomes for patients with preoperative CHF undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) have not been thoroughly established. This study evaluated the effect of preoperative CHF on 30-day outcomes following nonemergent intact EVAR using a large-scale national registry. METHODS: Patients who had infrarenal EVAR were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2012 to 2022. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distant aneurysm extent, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures between patients with and without preoperative CHF. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined. RESULTS: 467 (2.84%) CHF patients underwent intact EVAR. Meanwhile, 15,996 non-CHF patients underwent EVAR, where 2,248 of them were matched to all CHF patients. Patients with and without preoperative CHF had comparable 30-day mortality (3.02% vs. 2.62%, p = 0.64). However, CHF patients had higher myocardial infarction (3.02% vs. 1.47%, p = 0.03), pneumonia (3.23% vs. 1.73%, p = 0.04), 30-day readmission (p = 0.01), and longer length of stay (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: While patients with and without preoperative CHF had comparable 30-day mortality rates, those with CHF faced higher risks of cardiopulmonary complications. Effective management of preoperative CHF may help prevent postoperative complications in these patients.

Spliced-vein Conduit Offers Better Patency and Limb Salvage Than Prosthetic Graft for Femoral-Tibial Bypasses in Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Single-segment great saphenous vein (ssGSV) is the gold standard conduit for femoral-tibial bypasses in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In the absence of a good single-segment saphenous vein, alternative options are prosthetic grafts or spliced-vein conduits. Although spliced-vein conduits may provide better long-term patency/limb salvage, prosthetic grafts are more often the chosen conduit due to shorter operative and presumably better immediate postoperative outcomes; nevertheless, there is little data supporting this practice. In this study, we compared 30-day outcomes between spliced-vein and prosthetic conduits in CLTI bypass using a national registry. METHODS: CLTI patients who underwent lower extremity bypass using spliced vein (SpV) or prosthetic conduits only were selected from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted database. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was conducted between SpV and prosthetic groups to address preoperative differences. Thirty-day outcomes, including primary patency, reintervention, major amputation, mortality, major morbidity, transfusion, and wound complications, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 886 patients who underwent femoral-tibial bypass without ssGSV (104 SpV and 782 prosthetic grafts). All SpV patients were propensity-score matched to 445 prosthetic patients. SpV exhibited significantly better 30-day primary patency than prosthetic (87.5% vs 74.38%, P = 0.004). SpV was associated with significantly longer operative time (346 min vs 222 min, P < .001) and higher transfusion (43.3% vs 27.87%, P =0.003), but those did not translate into higher 30-day mortality or major systemic complications. There was no difference in wound complications or 30-day limb loss. CONCLUSION: Spliced-vein conduit affords significantly better 30-day primary patency than prosthetic grafts without increased mortality and morbidities. Therefore, despite greater procedural complexity and longer operative time, spliced-vein conduit should be considered when available. Future prospective studies are needed to investigate the long-term outcomes of these two conduits.

Malnutrition is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is particularly pertinent in patients undergoing vascular surgery, who frequently present with a high burden of comorbidities and advanced age that can impede nutrient absorption. While previous studies have established that vascular surgery patients with malnutrition had poorer outcomes, the impact of nutritional status in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has not yet been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of malnutrition on 30-day outcomes following non-ruptured EVAR. METHODS: Patients who had infrarenal EVAR were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012-2022. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, ruptured aneurysm, and emergency. Malnutrition was defined as patients with preoperative weight loss of greater than 10% decrease in body weight in the 6 months immediately preceding the surgery. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distant aneurysm extent, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures between patients with and without malnutrition. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined. RESULTS: There were 154 (0.94%) patients with malnutrition who went under non-ruptured EVAR. Meanwhile, 16,309 patients without malnutrition went under intact EVAR, where 737 of them were matched to all malnutrition patients. Malnourished patients had more comorbidity burdens. After propensity-score matching, patients with malnutrition had elevated but non-significant 30-day mortality (5.92% vs 2.99%, p = .09). However, malnutrition patients had higher risks of renal complications (2.63% vs 0.68%, p = .04), bleeding requiring transfusion (22.37% vs 14.38%, p = .02), and unplanned reoperation (11.18% vs 4.88%, p = .01), as well as longer length of stay (6.11 ± 7.91 vs 4.44 ± 6.22 days, p < .02). CONCLUSION: Patients with malnutrition experienced higher rates of morbidity after non-ruptured EVAR. Targeting malnutrition could be a strategy for preventing complications after EVAR and proper preoperative malnutritional management could be warranted.

Higher In-Hospital Mortality among Asian Americans Undergoing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure.

Background: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure to alleviate portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. While prior research highlighted racial disparities in TIPS, Asian Americans were not included in the investigation. This study aimed to investigate disparities in the immediate postprocedural outcomes among Asian American patients who underwent TIPS. Methods: The study identified Asian American and Caucasian patients who underwent TIPS in the National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Preprocedural factors, including demographics, comorbidities, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were matched by 1:2 propensity-score matching between the groups. In-hospital outcomes after TIPS were examined. Results: There were 6,658 patients who underwent TIPS with 128 (1.92%) Asian Americans and 4,574 (68.70%) Caucasians, where 218 Caucasians were matched to all Asian Americans. Asian Americans had higher in-hospital mortality (14.06% vs. 7.34%, p = 0.04) and higher total hospital charge (253,756 ± 37,867 vs. 163,391 ± 10,265 US dollars, p = 0.02). The occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, acute kidney injury, transfers out to other hospital facilities, and length of stay did not differ between cohorts. Conclusion: Despite their heightened risk for cirrhosis, Asian Americans are significantly underrepresented in TIPS and had higher in-hospital mortality after TIPS. This highlights the need for enhanced access to diagnosis and treatment care of liver cirrhosis for Asian Americans.

Does previous valve replacement affect short-term coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes? A population-based National Inpatient Sample study from 2015 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and valvular disease frequently coexist due to similar pathophysiology. Effort has been dedicated to comprehending the outcomes of concomitant coronary revascularization and valve replacement procedures. However, the understanding of how prior valve replacement affects the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains limited. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a population-based examination of the in-hospital outcomes in patients with previous valve replacement in CABG. METHODS: Patients who underwent CABG were identified in the National Inpatient Sample in the USA from Q4 2015-2020. Patients with age < 18 years and concomitant procedures were excluded. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address differences in demographics, socioeconomic status, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and transfer/admission status between patients with and without previous valve replacement. In-hospital postoperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: There were 514 patients with previous valve replacement who underwent CABG, who were matched to 1588 out of 167,668 controls. After matching, patients with valve replacement had mostly comparable in-hospital outcomes except for a higher risk of vascular complications (1.75 % vs 0.57 %, p = 0.02), a longer length of stay (10.90 ±â€¯7.04 days vs 9.95 ±â€¯6.53 days, p = 0.01), and higher hospital charges (275,465 ±â€¯229,088 US dollars vs 231,648 ±â€¯189,938 US dollars, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: For short-term outcomes, CABG is generally safe for patients who have undergone previous valve replacement, although there is an increased risk of vascular complications that may warrant additional attention. The findings of this study can be valuable for preoperative risk assessment of patients who have had valve replacement and are considering CABG.

Preoperative anemia is a risk factor for worse 30-day outcomes in both open and endovascular repair of non-ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a highly prevalent condition potentially linked to chronic inflammation. Preoperative anemia is an independent risk factor across many surgical fields. However, the relationship between anemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of preoperative anemia on 30-day outcomes of non-ruptured infrarenal AAA repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal AAA were identified in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted databases from 2012 to 2021. Anemia was defined as preoperative hematocrit less than 39% in males and 36% in females. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between anemic and non-anemic patients, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, indications, aneurysm extents, operation time, and surgical approaches. RESULTS: There were 408 (22.13%) anemic and 1436 (77.88%) non-anemic patients who underwent OSR for non-ruptured AAA, while 3586 (25.20%) patients with and 10,644 (74.80%) without anemia underwent EVAR. In both OSR and EVAR, anemic patients had higher risks of bleeding requiring transfusion (OSR, aOR = 2.446, p < .01; EVAR, aOR = 3.691, p < .01), discharge not to home (OSR, aOR = 1.385, p = .04; EVAR, aOR = 1.27, p < .01), and 30-day readmission (OSR, aOR = 1.99, p < .01; EVAR, aOR = 1.367, p < .01). Also, anemic patients undergoing OSR had higher pulmonary events (aOR = 2.192, p < .01), sepsis (aOR = 2.352, p < .01), and venous thromboembolism (aOR = 2.913, p = .01), while in EVAR, anemic patients had higher mortality (aOR = 1.646, p = .01), cardiac complications (aOR = 1.39, p = .04), renal dysfunction (aOR = 1.658, p = .02), and unplanned reoperation (aOR = 1.322, p = .01). Moreover, in both OSR and EVAR, anemic patients had longer hospital length of stay (p < .01). CONCLUSION: In OSR and EVAR, preoperative anemia was independently associated with worse 30-day outcomes. Preoperative anemia could be a useful marker for risk stratification for patients undergoing infrarenal AAA repair.

Evaluating outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure among Native Americans.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to explore racial disparities in immediate outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) among Native Americans, a group that have higher prevalence of liver cirrhosis but were the "invisible group" in previous TIPS studies due to their small population size. METHODS: The study identified Native Americans and Caucasians who underwent TIPS in National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from Q4 2015-2020. Preoperative factors, including demographics, indications for TIPS, comorbidities, etiologies for liver disease, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were matched by 1:5 propensity score matching. In-hospital post-TIPS outcomes were then compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: There were 6,658 patients who underwent TIPS, where 101 (1.52%) were Native Americans and 4,574 (68.70%) were Caucasians. Native Americans presented as younger, with a lower socioeconomic status, and displayed higher rates of alcohol abuse and related liver diseases. After propensity-score matching, Native Americans had comparable in-hospital post-TIPS outcomes including mortality (8.33% vs 9.09%, p = 1.00), hepatic encephalopathy (18.75% vs 25.84%, p = 0.19), acute kidney injury (28.13% vs 30.62%, p = 0.71), and other adverse events. Native Americans also had similar wait from admission to operation (2.15 ± 0.30 vs 2.87 ± 0.21 days, p = 0.13), hospital length of stay (7.43 ± 0.63 vs 8.62 ± 0.47 days, p = 0.13), and total costs (158,299 ± 14,218.2 vs 169,425 ± 8,600.7 dollars, p = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Native Americans had similar immediate outcomes after TIPS compared to their propensity-matched Caucasians. While these results underscore effective healthcare delivery of TIPS to Native Americans, it is imperative to pursue further research for long-term post-procedure outcomes.

Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease on 30-Day Outcomes in Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been identified as an independent predictor of poorer long-term prognosis after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, its impact on short-term perioperative outcomes is conflicting, which can be important for preoperative risk stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day outcomes of patients with CKD following non-ruptured complex EVAR in a national registry. METHODS: Patients who had EVAR for complex AAA were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012-2022. Complex AAA included juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal proximal extent, Type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm, and/or aneurysms treated with Zenith Fenestrated endograft. Exclusion criteria included age<18 years, ruptured AAA, acute intraoperative conversion to open, emergency presentation, and dialysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes of CKD and non-CKD patients, where demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distant aneurysm extent, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures were adjusted. RESULTS: There were 695 (39.33%) and 1072 (60.67%) patients with and without CKD, respectively, who underwent EVAR for complex AAA. Patients with and without CKD have comparable 30-day mortality (aOR = 1.165, 95 CI = 0.646-2.099, P = 0.61). However, CKD patients had a higher risk of renal complications (aOR = 2.647, 95 CI = 1.399-5.009, P < 0.01) including higher progressive renal insufficiency (aOR = 3.707, 95 CI = 1.329-10.338, P = 0.01) and acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (aOR = 2.533, 95 CI = 1.139-5.633, P = 0.02). All other 30-day outcomes were comparable between CKD and non-CKD patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with CKD had similar 30-day mortality and morbidity rates but a higher risk of postoperative renal complications. Therefore, meticulous preoperative planning and postoperative management, which may include optimal hydration, appropriate contrast use, and close renal function monitoring, are essential for patients with CKD after complex EVAR.

Smaller Hospital Size is Associated With Higher Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the need for immediate surgical intervention. Larger hospital size may be associated with better patient care and surgical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effect of hospital size on TAAD outcomes. METHOD: Patients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from Q4 2015-2020. NIS stratifies hospital size into small, medium, and large based on the number of hospital beds, geographical location, and the teaching status of the hospitals. Patients admitted to small/medium and large hospitals were stratified into two cohorts. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare in-hospital outcomes, adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics including procedural volume. RESULTS: There were 1106 and 3752 TAAD admitted to small/medium and large hospitals, respectively. Among patients admitted to small/medium hospitals, there was higher mortality (17.27% vs 14.37%, aOR = 1.32, P < 0.01), but shorter length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower cost (P = 0.03) compared to larger hospitals. There was no difference in morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Marked higher mortality is associated with admission to smaller hospitals among patients with TAAD, which may in turn decrease the average hospital stay and cost. Given that a significant percentage of patients are already being transferred out of the initial hospital and small/medium hospital is associated with higher mortality, centralization of care in centers of excellence may decrease the high mortality associated with TAAD.

Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia is Associated With Higher 30-day Mortality and Complications After Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Serum albumin level is routinely screened during preoperative assessments as a biomarker for poor nutritional status and/or concurrent inflammation. In esophagectomy, while early postoperative hypoalbuminemia is associated with a higher risk of adverse surgical outcomes, the effects of preoperative hypoalbuminemia on esophagectomy outcomes were conflicting. This study aimed to examine the effect of preoperative hypoalbuminemia on 30-day outcomes following esophagectomy. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) esophagectomy targeted database from 2016 to 2022 was used. Patients with preoperative serum albumin <3.4 g/L were defined as having hypoalbuminemia. Patients with and without hypoalbuminemia were propensity-score matched (1:3 ratio) for demographics, baseline characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approaches, tumor diagnosis, and pathologic staging of the malignancy. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined. RESULTS: There were 803 (10.24%) and 7046 (89.76%) patients with and without preoperative hypoalbuminemia who underwent esophagectomy, respectively. After propensity-score matching, all patients with hypoalbuminemia were matched to 2170 controls. After propensity-matching, patients with hypoalbuminemia had higher risks of mortality (4.48% vs 3.00%, P = 0.04), sepsis (14.94% vs 10.92%, P < 0.01), and bleeding requiring transfusion (21.30% vs 13.50%, P < 0.01). Also, patients with hypoalbuminemia had a higher rate of discharge not to home (42.65% vs 34.81%, P < 0.01) and longer LOS (12.69 ± 9.09 vs 11.39 ± 8.16 days, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative hypoalbuminemia had increased risks of mortality and complications after esophagectomy. Thus, preoperative hypoalbuminemia could be a useful and cost-effective tool for preoperative risk stratification for patients undergoing esophagectomy, and correcting the underlying cause of hypoalbuminemia may help decrease the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.

Thirty-day outcomes of non-emergent colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can have significant colonic involvement and carries a long-term risk of surgical resection. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and IBD share multiple inflammatory pathways, suggesting a bidirectional relationship through proposed pulmonary-intestinal cross-talk. This study aimed to examine the association between COPD and 30-day outcomes following non-emergent colectomies for IBD. METHODS: Patients with IBD as the primary indication for colectomy were selected from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) colectomy database 2012-2022. Emergency colectomy cases were excluded. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to balance the preoperative characteristics of COPD and non-COPD patients. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 25,285 patients who underwent colectomy for IBD, 365 (1.44 %) had COPD. Patients with COPD were older and had more comorbidities. After propensity-score matching, all COPD patients were matched to 1,095 patients without COPD. COPD and non-COPD patients had comparable 30-day mortality (3.29 % vs 2.19 %, p = 0.25). However, COPD patients had higher pulmonary complications (14.79 % vs 7.21 %, p < 0.01) attributed to pneumonia (10.14 % vs 4.02 %, p < 0.01), sepsis (12.88 % vs 8.68 %, p = 0.02), prolonged postoperative nothing by mouth (NPO) or nasogastric tube (NGT) use (28.22 % vs 22.10 %, p = 0.02), discharge not to home (40.28 % vs 34.02 %, p = 0.04), and longer length of stay (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Therefore, given their mortality rates, colectomy is an effective treatment for IBD patients with concurrent COPD, while their postoperative care should include close monitoring of pulmonary symptoms and timely interventions to prevent further complications. Future research should explore the long-term prognosis of COPD patients after colectomy for IBD.

The association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 30-day outcomes of infrainguinal bypass surgery: A propensity-score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Infrainguinal bypass surgery is an effective treatment for peripheral artery disease (PAD). While chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been linked to heightened risks of mortality and morbidity in major surgery, a thorough investigation into COPD's impact on infrainguinal bypass outcomes remained underexplored. Thus, this study aimed to assess the 30-day outcomes for COPD patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery. METHODS: COPD and non-COPD patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass were identified in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2022. Patients of age<18 were excluded. A 1:1 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics, baseline characteristics, symptomatology, procedure, conduit, and anesthesia. Thirty postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were 3,183 (12.64%) and 22,004 (87.36%) patients with and without COPD, respectively, who underwent infrainguinal bypass. COPD patients had a higher comorbid burden. After propensity-score matching, COPD patients had higher sepsis (3.55% vs 2.42%, p = 0.01), wound complications (18.94% vs 16.40%, p = 0.01), and 30-day readmission (18.00% vs 14.92%, p < 0.01). However, COPD and non-COPD patients had comparable 30-day mortality (2.54% vs 2.67%, p = 0.81), and organ system complications including cardiac (3.58% vs 3.99%, p = 0.43), pulmonary (3.96% vs 3.20%, p = 0.12), and renal complications (1.70% vs 1.82%, p = 0.78). Limb-specific outcomes including major amputation (2.95% vs 2.50%, p = 0.30), untreated loss of patency (1.85% vs 1.38%, p = 0.16), and patent graft (98.24% vs 98.65%, p = 0.27) were also comparable between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: While COPD might be associated with the development of PAD due to potentially shared pathophysiology, it may not be an independent risk factor for the major 30-day outcomes in infrainguinal bypass surgery.

Prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients with prosthetic bypasses increases deep wound complications.

BACKGROUND: Incisional complications of groin after inflow or infrainguinal bypasses with prosthetic conduits can result in major morbidities that require reoperation, infected graft removal, and limb loss. Muscle flaps are typically performed to treat groin wound complications, but they are also done prophylactically at the time of index procedures in certain high-risk-for-poor-healing patients to mitigate anticipated groin wound complications. We used a nationwide multi-institutional database to investigate outcomes of prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk patients who underwent prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis. METHODS: We utilized ACS-NSQIP database 2005-2021 to identify all elective inflow and infrainguinal bypasses that involve femoral anastomoses. Only high-risk patients for poor incisional healing who underwent prosthetic conduit bypasses were selected. A 1:3 propensity-matching was performed to obtain two comparable studied groups between those with (FLAP) and without prophylactic muscle flaps (NOFLAP) based on demographics and comorbidities. 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 35,011 NOFLAP, 990 of them were propensity-matched to 330 FLAP. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, MACE, pulmonary, or renal complications. FLAP was associated with higher bleeding requiring transfusion, longer operative time, and longer hospital stay. FLAP also had higher overall wound complications (15.2% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.03), especially deep incisional infection (4.9% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic muscle flap for prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients does not appear to mitigate 30-day wound complications. Caution should be exercised with this practice and more long-term data should be obtained to determine whether prophylactic flaps decrease the incidence of graft infection.

Peripheral artery disease is an independent risk factor for higher in-hospital mortality in Stanford type A aortic dissection repair.

BACKGROUND: Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is an emergent condition that warrants immediate intervention. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a prevalent disease associated with worse outcomes in various cardiovascular procedures. However, it remains unclear whether PAD influences outcomes of TAAD repair. This study aimed to undertake a population-based analysis to assess impact of PAD on in-hospital outcomes following TAAD repair. METHODS: Patients underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without PAD, adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and transfer/admission status. RESULTS: 1525 patients with PAD and 2757 non-PAD patients underwent TAAD. PAD patients had higher mortality (18.62% vs 13.17%, aOR = 1.287, p = .01), AKI (51.41% vs 47.48%, aOR = 1.222, p < .01), infection (10.69% vs 8.02%, aOR = 1.269, p = .03), and vascular complication (7.28% vs 3.77%, aOR = 1.846, p < .01) but lower risks of pericardial complications (15.21% vs 19.95%, aOR = 0.696, p < .01). In addition, patients with PAD had longer time from admission to operation (1.29 ± 3.95 vs 0.70 ± 2.09 days, p < .01), longer LOS (14.92 ± 13.98 vs 13.41 ± 11.66 days, p = .01), and higher hospital charge (499,064 ± 519,405 vs 409,754 ± 405,663 US dollars, p < .01). CONCLUSION: PAD was independently associated with worse outcome after TAAD repair. The elevated mortality rate could be attributed to the delay in surgery, which may be related to preoperative peripheral malperfusion syndrome that is common in PAD patients. A balance between preoperative management and immediate TAAD repair might be essential to prevent the increased mortality risk from treatment delays among PAD patients.

Preoperative depression is an independent risk factor for short-term morbidities in autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Depression is notably common among patients who have undergone mastectomy. Several post-mastectomy patients opt for elective breast reconstruction. However, evidence on the influence of preoperative depression on breast reconstruction outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative depression on the short-term outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) using a comprehensive national registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent ABR or IBR were identified from the national inpatient sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between the patients with and without depression, adjusted for demographics, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among the 12,984 patients who underwent ABR, 1578 (12 %) had depression whereas 1980 (11 %) out of 17,963 patients who underwent IBR had depression. In ABR and IBR, preoperative depression was associated with higher superficial wound complications (ABR, aOR = 1.386, 95 % CI = 1.035-1.856, p = 0.03; IBR, aOR = 1.281, 95 % CI = 1.001-1.638, p = 0.04), hemorrhage/hematoma (ABR, aOR = 1.164, 95 % CI = 1.010-1.355, p = 0.04; IBR, aOR = 1.614, 95 % CI = 1.279-2.037, p < 0.01), and longer hospital length of stay (p < 0.01). In ABR, patients with depression had higher incidences of infection (aOR = 1.906, 95 % CI = 1.246-2.917, p < 0.01) and sepsis (aOR = 15.609, 95 % CI = 1.411-172.65, p = 0.03). In IBR, patients with depression had higher risks of capsular contracture (aOR = 1.477, 95 % CI = 1.105-1.976, p = 0.01) and seroma (aOR = 1.489, 95 % CI = 1.005-2.208, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Preoperative depression is independently associated with major morbidities after ABR and IBR. Preoperative screening for depression can be beneficial. Findings from this study can facilitate preoperative risk stratification and post-operative care for patients with depression.