To be in pain (or not): a computer enables outpatients to inform their physician.

BACKGROUND: In the outpatient oncology clinic, pain management is often inadequate. Incorporating a systematic pain management program into visits is likely to improve this. We implemented an integrated program, including a structured pain assessment, pain treatment protocol and patient education module. In the present study, we investigated whether this intervention improved pain control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At seven oncology outpatient clinics, patients were asked to register their pain intensity on a touch screen computer. These scores were made available into their electronic medical records. Additionally, a hospital-wide treatment protocol for cancer-related pain and a patient education module were developed. A data warehouse system enabled us to extract patient data from the electronic medical record anonymously and to use them for analysis. The primary outcome of the study was the percentage of patients with moderate to severe pain [current pain (CPI), NRS > 4] measured during 2 weeks at the start and 6 months after implementation. As secondary outcomes, we studied the percentage of pain registrations in specific patient groups and the percentage of patients treated with a curative and a palliative intention with (moderate-severe) pain. Differences were tested with the χ(2) test. RESULTS: During the first 6 months, 3407 of the 4345 patients (78%) registered their pain intensity on the touch screen computer. The percentage of patients with moderate to severe CPI decreased 32% (P = 0.021): from 12.5% at start to 8.5% after 6 months. More patients in the palliative phase than in the curative phase of their disease registered their pain intensity (82% versus 75%, respectively, P < 0.005), and more patients in the palliative phase experienced moderate to severe pain (23% versus 14%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain registration by patients themselves is feasible, provides insight into patients' pain intensity and may improve pain control in outpatients with cancer-related pain. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Because this is an innovation project and not a primary research project, it has no clinical trial number. The protocol and all materials involved were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Erasmus MC (MEC-2009-324).

Higher doses of opioids in patients who need palliative sedation prior to death: cause or consequence?

BACKGROUND: Palliative sedation (PS) is necessary in a significant percentage of patients dying on an acute palliative care unit (PCU). Common indications are terminal restlessness, pain and dyspnoea. On our PCU, terminal restlessness was the main indication for PS but pain was the most prevalent symptom during admission. Because delirium is often drug induced in terminal cancer patients and opioids are amongst the most frequently implicated drugs, we hypothesised that the underlying pain problem and its treatment might have been related to the need for sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we did a retrospective analysis on the use of medication with potential cognitive side-effects, focusing on analgesics, in 68 patients who died on the PCU after PS and 89 patients who died without PS. RESULTS: Ultimately sedated patients used opioids in significantly higher doses; they were more often treated with a rotation to another opioid and with amitriptyline. The dose of opioids used at various time points between admission and death was strongly related to the probability of PS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that, although pain was not the main indication for PS, pain and its treatment might have been primarily related to the need for palliative sedation in this patient cohort.

[Treatment of pain in cancer with systemically administered opioids]. / Behandeling van pijn bij kanker met systemisch toegediende opioïden.

The World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief have been proven efficacious in 90% of the patients with cancer pain. The patient's self-report of pain is the focus of treatment. When initiating treatment, controlled-release preparations of opioids are generally favoured, and are combined with immediate release morphine to prevent or treat 'breakthrough' pain and to enable the optimum opioid dosage to be calculated. (Breakthrough pain is a transient increase in pain in a patient who has stable, persistent pain treated with opioids.) In patients with an unfavourable balance between analgesia and side effects, the following strategies may be useful, together with appropriate treatment of the side effects: Sequential opioid trials (so-called opioid rotation) is an approach which is effective in 50-70% of the patients. Changing the route of opioid administration is successful in 70-95% of the patients. When selecting an invasive technique, continuous subcutaneous infusion is medically preferred. Spinal analgesia is an alternative. Knowledge of the relative potency of opioid drugs and of their biologic availability is needed to guide changes in drugs or routes of administration.