Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 212
Filtrar
4.
Radiology ; 273(3): 948, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25420172
7.
Ann Emerg Med ; 63(1): 25-32, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24134958

RESUMEN

Availability, reliability, and technical improvements have led to continued expansion of computed tomography (CT) imaging. During a CT scan, there is substantially more exposure to ionizing radiation than with conventional radiography. This has led to questions and critical conclusions about whether the continuous growth of CT scans should be subjected to review and potentially restraints or, at a minimum, closer investigation. This is particularly pertinent to populations in emergency departments, such as children and patients who receive repeated CT scans for benign diagnoses. During the last several decades, among national medical specialty organizations, the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American College of Radiology have each formed membership working groups to consider value, access, and expedience and to promote broad acceptance of CT protocols and procedures within their disciplines. Those efforts have had positive effects on the use criteria for CT by other physician groups, health insurance carriers, regulators, and legislators.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Medicina Defensiva/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 11(1): 36-44, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135540

RESUMEN

Availability, reliability, and technical improvements have led to continued expansion of computed tomography (CT) imaging. During a CT scan, there is substantially more exposure to ionizing radiation than with conventional radiography. This has led to questions and critical conclusions about whether the continuous growth of CT scans should be subjected to review and potentially restraints or, at a minimum, closer investigation. This is particularly pertinent to populations in emergency departments, such as children and patients who receive repeated CT scans for benign diagnoses. During the last several decades, among national medical specialty organizations, the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American College of Radiology have each formed membership working groups to consider value, access, and expedience and to promote broad acceptance of CT protocols and procedures within their disciplines. Those efforts have had positive effects on the use criteria for CT by other physician groups, health insurance carriers, regulators, and legislators.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Medicina de Emergencia/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Protección Radiológica/normas , Radiología/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Adhesión a Directriz , Estados Unidos
9.
Acad Radiol ; 20(12): 1613-4, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24200491
11.
Acad Radiol ; 20(11): 1473, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119363
16.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(8): 639, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23763876
17.
Acad Radiol ; 20(6): 791, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23664406
18.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(5): 386, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23642882
20.
Acad Radiol ; 20(5): 661, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23570940
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA