Development and Validation of a Measure of Attitudes toward Fluffy Women.

BACKGROUND: There is an absence of research on the newly evolved term "fluffy" which describes body image and personality features among women. Research on "fluffiness" among Caribbean peoples has been limited by the lack of valid and reliable measures of the concept. OBJECTIVE: This project addresses this problem by exploring the internal consistency reliability and the concurrent and discriminant validity of the Attitudes toward Fluffy Women Scale (ATFW) using a mixture of past and present students from The University of the West Indies (UWI), Mona, and the University of Technology (UTech), Kingston. METHOD: Past or present students from The UWI, Mona, and UTech, Kingston, were recruited for the study through the use of convenience sampling. A total of 80 students (38 males, 47.5%; 42 females, 52.5%) participated in the study. RESULTS: Overall, the ATFW was found to have an acceptable degree of internal consistency reliability (α = 0.90). The scale also had reasonably good concurrent validity as evidenced by moderate correlations with scores on the Attitudes Toward Obese Persons Scale (r = -0.42) and acceptable discriminant validity as demonstrated through low correlations with a Bogardus Social Distance Scale designed to assess prejudice toward people living with the human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] (r = 0.29). This pattern of scores suggests that the majority of the stable variance underlying the ATFW assesses the "fluffy" concept (17.6%) while a smaller degree of the variability (8%) measures a conceptually similar but distinct concept. CONCLUSION: The Attitudes toward Fluffy Women scale was found to be a reliable and valid scale for assessing the attitudes of young adults toward fluffy women.

Subjective well-being of adults with homozygous sickle cell disease in Jamaica.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the subjective well-being of adults with homozygous sickle cell (SS) disease to a matched group of healthy adult peers. The differential influence of sociodemographic factors on the subjective well-being of Sickle Cell patients was also examined. METHODS: The Ferran and Powers Quality of Life Index and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were used to assess subjective well-being. Seventy-five homozygous sickle cell (SS) disease patients and sixty-seven matched controls (adults with normal haemoglobin: AA) from the Sickle Cell Disease Cohort Study in Jamaica were interviewed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine differences between the groups. RESULT: Patients with Sickle cell (SS) disease were less satisfied than matched controls with their lives overall, their health and functioning, social and economic situation and psychological functioning. Sickle cell disease patients reported lower levels of positive affect but similar levels of negative affect as controls. Unemployed sickle cell disease patients were less satisfied than all other adults with their lives overall, health and functioning, psychological functioning and social and economic situation. Sickle cell disease patients with lower occupational status were less satisfied with their family life than all other adults. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that subjective well-being is compromised in patients with homozygous sickle cell disease. These patients may benefit from interventions designed to improve their subjective well-being.

Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory II in HIV-positive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Research on depression among HIV-positive patients has been limited by the lack of a valid and reliable measure of depression. This project addresses this problem by exploring the internal consistency reliability and the concurrent and discriminant validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) using HIV-positive patients in Jamaica. METHOD: Patients from three HIV clinics in Jamaica (n = 191 patients; 61% female, 39% male, mean age 40.5-10 years) were administered the BDI-II along with the Centre for Epidemiological Studies -Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Social Provisions Scale. RESULTS: Overall, the BDI-II was found to have a high degree of reliability (alpha = 0.89). The scale also had good concurrent validity as evidenced by a high correlation with scores on the CES-D (r = 0.74) and acceptable discriminant validity as demonstrated through a moderate correlation with the Social Provisions Scale (r = -0.42). This pattern of scores suggests that the majority of the variance underlying the BDI-II assesses depression (55%) while a smaller degree of the variability (18%) measures a conceptually similar but distinct concept. CONCLUSION: The BDI-II is a sufficiently reliable and valid measure for assessing depression in HIV-positive patients.

Factors associated with depression in students at The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica.

OBJECTIVE: This project examines the factors associated with depression in students attending the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus. METHOD: Students enrolled in the Foundation courses during the first and second semesters of the 2005/2006 academic year were administered the Brief Screen for Depression as well as a demographic questionnaire as part of a larger study. RESULTS: A wide cross-section of the university population was sampled (n = 690; 252 from semester one, 438 from semester two; 77% females, 23% males; age 16-62 years, median = 20 years, mean = 23.4 years +/- 7.4). Nearly 40% of students scored in the clinically depressed range. Students in the December wave of data collection had higher depression scores than those in the January wave. Consistent with international research, females reported significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms. Married students reported significantly lower depression scores than students in visiting relationships. Students who were combining employment and school reported lower depression scores than those who were not employed. Maternal education significantly influenced students' levels of depression such that students whose mothers had university or other tertiary education had lower depression scores while those whose mothers had primary or lower education had the highest depression scores. Students with a chronic condition or a disability scored higher than those without such problems on all three measures of depression. CONCLUSION: Depression may be a significant problem in students at The University of the West Indies, Mona campus.

Validation of the beck depression inventory-II in a Jamaican university student cohort / Validación del inventario de depresión de beck II en una cohorte de estudiantes universitarios jamaicanos

OBJECTIVE: This project explores the internal consistency reliability and the concurrent and discriminant validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) using a wide cross-section of the student population attending the University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Students enrolled in UWI Foundation courses during the first and second semesters of the 2005/2006 academic year (n = 690; 77% females, 23% males; mean age = 23.4 +/- 7.4 years) were administered the BDI-II along with the Brief Screen for Depression (BSD), the Centre for Epidemiological Studies--Depression Scale (CES-D) and the UCLA Loneliness Scale--Revised. RESULTS: Overall, the BDI-II was found to have an acceptable degree of reliability (alpha = 0.90). The scale also had reasonably good concurrent validity as evidenced by high correlations with scores on the BSD (r = 0.74) and the CES-D (r = 0.71) and acceptable discriminant validity as demonstrated through moderate correlations with the UCLA Loneliness Scale (r = 0.50). This pattern of scores suggests that the majority of the variance underlying the BDI-II assesses depression (50% to 55%) while a smaller degree of the variability (25%) measures a conceptually similar but distinct concept. CONCLUSION: The BDI-II is a reliable and valid measure for assessing depression within the Jamaican population.

OBJETIVO: Este proyecto explora la fiabilidad de la consistencia interna y la validez discriminante y concurrente del inventario de depresión de Beck II (IDB - II) usando una amplia sección transversal de la población estudiantil que asiste a la Universidad de West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica. SUJETOS Y MÉTODOS: A los estudiantes matriculados en los cursos de Fundación de UWI durante el primer y segundo semestres del año académico 2005/2006 (n = 690; 77% hembras 23% varones; edad promedio = 23.4 años B1 7.4) se les aplicó el IDB - II junto con la Prueba Breve para la Detección de la Depresión (BSD), la Escala de Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D), y la Escala Revisada de Soledad de la Universidad de los Ángeles de California. RESULTADOS: En general, se halló que el IDB - II tenía un grado aceptable de fiabilidad (a = 0.90). La escala también tenía una validez concurrente razonablemente tal como lo evidencian las altas correlaciones con las puntuaciones del BSD (r = 0.74) y el CES-D (r = 0.71), y una validez discriminante aceptable como quedó demostrado mediante las correlaciones moderadas con la Escala de Soledad de UCLA (r = 0.50). Este patrón de puntuaciones sugiere que la mayor parte de la varianza que subyace en el IDB - II evalúa la depresión (50% a 55%) mientras que un grado menor de variabilidad (25%) mide un concepto conceptualmente similar pero distinto. CONCLUSIÓN: El IDB - II constituye un instrumento de medición fiable y válido para evaluar la depresión en la población jamaicana.

Validation of the beck depression inventory-II in a Jamaican university student cohort.

OBJECTIVE: This project explores the internal consistency reliability and the concurrent and discriminant validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) using a wide cross-section of the student population attending the University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Students enrolled in UWI Foundation courses during the first and second semesters of the 2005/2006 academic year (n = 690; 77% females, 23% males; mean age = 23.4 +/- 7.4 years) were administered the BDI-II along with the Brief Screen for Depression (BSD), the Centre for Epidemiological Studies--Depression Scale (CES-D) and the UCLA Loneliness Scale--Revised. RESULTS: Overall, the BDI-II was found to have an acceptable degree of reliability (alpha = 0.90). The scale also had reasonably good concurrent validity as evidenced by high correlations with scores on the BSD (r = 0.74) and the CES-D (r = 0.71) and acceptable discriminant validity as demonstrated through moderate correlations with the UCLA Loneliness Scale (r = 0.50). This pattern of scores suggests that the majority of the variance underlying the BDI-II assesses depression (50% to 55%) while a smaller degree of the variability (25%) measures a conceptually similar but distinct concept. CONCLUSION: The BDI-II is a reliable and valid measure for assessing depression within the Jamaican population.

Validation of the Brief Screen for Depression in a Jamaican cohort / Validación de la prueba breve para la detección de la depresión en una Cohorte Jamaicana

Research on depression in Jamaicans has been limited by the absence of a psychometrically sound measure of depression. This project attempts to rectify this problem by exploring the concurrent and discriminant validity of the Brief Screen for Depression (BSD) using a sample of 244 students attending the University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica. Participants were administered the BSD along with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale - Revised, (UCLA-R) and the Responding Desirably on Attitudes and Opinions scale (RD16). Overall, the BSD was found to have an acceptable level of concurrent validity as evidenced by high correlations with scores on the BDI (0.64) and the CES-D (0.62), and an acceptable level of discriminant validity as demonstrated through moderate correlations with the UCLA Loneliness Scale (0.40). In addition, the BSD was found to possess a moderate degree of sensitivity in identifying individuals who may be experiencing clinically significant symptoms of depression.

Validation of the Brief Screen for Depression in a Jamaican cohort.

Research on depression in Jamaicans has been limited by the absence of a psychometrically sound measure of depression. This project attempts to rectify this problem by exploring the concurrent and discriminant validity of the Brief Screen for Depression (BSD) using a sample of 244 students attending the University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica. Participants were administered the BSD along with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale - Revised, (UCLA-R) and the Responding Desirably on Attitudes and Opinions scale (RD16). Overall, the BSD was found to have an acceptable level of concurrent validity as evidenced by high correlations with scores on the BDI (0.64) and the CES-D (0.62), and an acceptable level of discriminant validity as demonstrated through moderate correlations with the UCLA Loneliness Scale (0.40). In addition, the BSD was found to possess a moderate degree of sensitivity in identifying individuals who may be experiencing clinically significant symptoms of depression.