An exploratory study of drug concentration and inhibitory effect of cetylpyridinium chloride buccal tablets on SARS-CoV-2 infection among 10 Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: It was evidenced that cetylpyridinium-chloride (CPC) mouthwash could inhibit SARS-COV-2 activity and reduce salivary viral load, thus reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. However, due to insufficient residence time in the oral cavity, CPC-containing mouthwashes have no prolonged antiviral effect. The duration of action of the CPC buccal tablet is expected to be longer than that of the mouthwash. However, there are currently no reports on the salivary drug concentration of CPC buccal tablets. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the salivary drug concentration of CPC buccal tablets and the antiviral effect of CPC on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a single-dose, single-arm clinical trial, involving 10 Chinese healthy subjects who received 2-mg CPC buccal tablet to collect saliva samples and to detect saliva concentration at different timepoints within 2 h (Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT05802628, Registration Date: April 6, 2023). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CPC concentration in saliva was detected by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on the non-compartmental model. With an in vitro antiviral experiment, the activity of CPC buccal tablets against SARS-CoV-2 and its cellular toxicity was tested. RESULTS: Drug concentrations in saliva at 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, and 2 h after administration were 8008.33 (1042.25, 41081.11), 2093.34 (373.15, 5759.83), 1016.58 (378.66, 3480.68), 891.77 (375.66, 6322.07), and 717.43 (197.87, 2152.71) ng/mL. PK parameters of saliva concentration: Cmax = 8008.33 (1042.25, 41081.11) ng/mL, AUC0-t = 4172.37 (904.42, 13912.61) ng/mL * h, AUC0-∞ = 6712.85 (1856.77, 19971.12) ng/mL * h, T1/2 = 1.22 (0.59, 2.83) h, Tmax = 0.25 (0.25, 0.25) h. As determined in in vitro experiment, CPC was active on SARS-CoV-2 with cytotoxic and inhibitory activity of CC50 = 35.75 µM (≈12155 ng/mL) and EC50 = 7.39 µM (≈2512.6 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The comparison between the salivary CPC concentration and EC50/CC50 values from in vitro antiviral experiments suggests that CPC buccal tablets may inhibit SARS-CoV-2 activity, and the inhibition may last for approximately 30 min without cytotoxicity.

Evaluation of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors monotherapy and combination therapy in lymphocytic leukemia.

BTKi is an effective treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, head-to-head clinical trials between BTKi are rare. To explore evidence-based treatment decisions, we conducted this network meta-analysis. We searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase and selected articles of BTKi treatment in CLL patients, with English restrictions. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were outcomes. Combination therapy and acalabrutinib monotherapy achieved great ORR (greater than 80%). Combination therapy (AO and IR) also performed terrific PFS (> 80%). Compared with ibrutinib monotherapy, zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib and IR showed no significance in overall survival. Diarrhea, hypertension, cardiac events, neutropenia were common adverse events of BTKi therapy. IR had higher incidence of hypertension (0.38, 95% CI 0.28-0.48), and IU was more likely occurred cardiac events. Zanubrutinib monotherapy had lower incidence of total serious adverse reaction (0.42, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.36-0.47),while ibrutinib monotherapy occurred higher adverse reactions of grade ≥ 3 (0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82). Although both BTKi monotherapy and combination therapy showed great efficacy, combination therapy did not display priority. Meanwhile, safety of BTKi combination therapy needs to be fully and comprehensively considered.Registration number: CRD42022378732.

Efficacy and safety of oncolytic virus combined with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumor patients: A meta-analysis.

Background: In recent years, several clinical trials have focused on oncolytic virus (OVs) combined with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid tumor patients, which showed encouraging effects. However, few studies have concentrated on the summary on the safety and efficacy of the combined treatments. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the safety and curative effect of the combined therapy. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases to comprehensively select articles on OVs combined with chemotherapy or ICIs for the solid tumor treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival rate, 2-year survival rate, objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were the outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies with 903 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 32% [95% confidence interval (CI): 27-36%, I2 = 24.9%, p = 0.239]. Median OS and median PFS were 6.79 months (CI: 4.29-9.30, I2 = 62.9%, p = 0.044) and 3.40 months (CI: 2.59-4.22, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.715), respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 38% (CI: 0.29-0.47, I2 = 62.9%, p = 0.044), and the 2-year survival rate was 24% (CI: 12-37%, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.805). The most common AEs were fever (63%, CI: 57-69%, I2 = 2.3%, p = 0.402), fatigue (58%, CI: 51-65%, I2 = 49.2%, p = 0.096), chill (52%, CI: 43-60%, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.958), and neutropenia (53%, CI: 47-60%, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.944). Conclusion: OVs combined with ICIs showed a better efficacy than OVs combined with chemotherapy, which lends support to further clinical trials of OVs combined with ICIs. In addition, OVs combined with pembrolizumab can exert increased safety and efficacy. The toxicity of grades ≥3 should be carefully monitored and observed. However, high-quality, large-scale clinical trials should be completed to further confirm the efficacy and safety of OVs combined with ICIs. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/login.php], identifier [RD42022348568].

A Randomized Controlled Dose-Escalation Study of LY06006, a Recombinant Humanized Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Chinese Healthy Adults.

Background: This study was conducted to explore the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of LY06006, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to RANKL, when administrated subcutaneously in Chinese healthy adults. Research design and methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study performed in 32 healthy Chinese adults, who were randomly assigned to receive a single injection dose of 18, 60, 120 mg study drug or placebo with a follow-up of 140-252 days. Results: No deaths or drug-related serious adverse events occurred. LY06006 was rapidly absorbed in the 60 mg group with a Tmax range of 120-480 h and serum LY06006 concentrations decreased slowly 11-13 days after dosing with a long mean (SD) half-life of 389.58 (63.44) h. The most frequent AEs were elevated serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level (83.3%), hypocalcemia (54.2%), and hypophosphatemia (45.8%). None of the 32 subjects tested positive for anti-drug antibody during the trial. Conclusion: Single-dose subcutaneous administration of LY06006 was safe and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese adults. Cmax showed linear pharmacokinetic characteristics in the dose range of 18-120 mg based on dose-exposure proportionality analysis.

[Progress of Research on 6-Thioguanine versus 6-Mercaptopurine in childhood ALL].

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common type of cancer in children. Despite good remission rate has achieved nowadays, the patients still face a substantial risk of relapse. It has long been recognized that thiopurines are critical components in the treatment for prevention of recurrence in childhood ALL, the 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) has usually been used in daily long-term maintenance therapy, and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) limited to the reinforcement of therapy. However, there is no optimal regimen for 6-TG or 6-MP. The related research advances on the clinical effectiveness of the two thiopurines are reviewed.