Proposals for the delineation of neck clinical target volume for definitive Radiation therapy in patients with oral/ oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer based on lymph node distribution.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To establish the distribution pattern of cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) and propose optimized clinical target volume (CTV) boundaries specific to oral/ oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OSCC/OPSCC). MATERIALS/METHODS: 531 patients with pathologically confirmed OSCC/OPSCC were enrolled from January 2013 to June 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the minimal distance from the lesion's edge to the body's midline: ≤1 cm or > 1 cm. The geometric center of cervical metastatic LN was marked on a template CT. LN distribution probability maps were established. The relationships between the LN distribution and consensus guidelines were analyzed to propose modifications for CTV boundaries specific to OSCC/OPSCC. RESULTS: A total of 1962 positive LNs were enrolled. Compared with the > 1 cm group, the ≤ 1 cm group has following feature tendencies: male smokers, younger, median organs, large gross lesion, infiltrative growth pattern, contralateral LNM. The most frequently involved level of LNM was ipsilateral II, but ipsilateral Ib had the highest involvement rate in the > 1 cm OSCC group. In addition, tongue cancer had a higher incidence of LN extranodal extension (ENE), which mainly distributes in ipsilateral level II. The skip metastasis was prone to from level III to Vb (3.5 %) in LN(+)/ENE (-), and level Ib to VIa (3.7 %) in LN(+)/ENE (+). Accordingly, we proposed the following modifications: 1. only including lateral and posterior margin of submandibular gland within 5 mm; 2. retracting posterior boundary of level II to front edge of levator scapula muscle, and descending the upper boundary to transverse process of C2 vertebra only for OSCC; 3. including posterior third of thyroglossal muscle or anterior edge of sternocleidomastoid muscle; 4. sparing level Va in case of only level II involvement; 5. including upper area of the thyroid cartilage plate in case of level Ib LN(+)/ENE (+); 6. sparing level VIIa is considered. CONCLUSION: This is the first description of LN topographic spread patterns for OSCC/OPSCC. Modified CTV for prophylactic irradiation was proposed to spare the organs at risk and minimize adverse effects.

Eosinophil dynamics during chemo-radiotherapy correlate to clinical outcome in stage â ¡-â £a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: Results from a large cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We investigated the dynamics of eosinophil depletion during definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) and their association with the prognosis of stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fuzzy C-means algorithm (FCMA) assessed longitudinal trends in circulating eosinophil counts (CECs) of 1225 patients throughout the period of radical radiotherapy. The prognostic impact on patients' survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional risk model was used to determine the hazard ratio for adverse prognostic effects in grades of eosinophil depletion. The interactive effect of pre-treatment CECs and CCRT on outcomes was evaluated using HRs within the framework of Cox regression models. RESULTS: Three grades of eosinophil depletion, as defined by the interaction between dynamic types of CECs in the period of treatment and the value of CECs at the termination of treatment, significantly stratified the poor prognosis in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) [1.57-fold (P = 0.001), 1.69-fold (P = 0.007), and 1.51-fold (P = 0.019) for G1, 2.4-fold (P < 0.001), 2.76-fold (P < 0.001), and 2.31-fold (P < 0.001) for G2, as compared with G0]. Furthermore, high levels of pre-treatment CECs acted as the strongest protective factor against severe depletion grade (G0 vs. G2, HR = 0.20, P = 0.005; G1 vs. G2, HR = 0.14, P < 0.001). However, compared with radiotherapy alone, the benefit from CCRT was attenuated in patients with high pre-treatment CECs. CONCLUSIONS: CECs reduction after treatment in patients with NPC may be helpful in the clinical setting to aid in assessing the prognosis for standard treatment of NPC.

Radiation-induced eosinophil increase ratio predicts patient outcomes in non-small celllung cancer.

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is a double-edged sword in regulating immune responses. This study aimed to investigate the impact of thoracic RT on circulating eosinophils and its association with patient outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 240 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with definitive thoracic RT from January 2012 to January 2020. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), multivariate Cox analyses to identify significant variables, and Spearman's correlation to qualify the relationship between dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters and EIR. Results: Absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) showed an increasing trend during RT and an obvious peak in the 1st month after RT. Thresholds of eosinophil increase ratio (EIR) at the 1st month after RT for both OS and PFS were 1.43. Patients with high EIR above 1.43 experienced particularly favorable clinical outcomes (five-year OS: 21% versus 10%, P<0.0001; five-year PFS: 10% versus 8%, P=0.014), but may not derive PFS benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to RT. The higher a patient's EIR, the larger the potential benefit in the absence of chemotherapy. DVH parameters including heart mean dose and heart V10 were negatively associated with EIR. None of these DVH parameters was correlated with the clinical outcomes. Conclusion: EIR may serve as a potential biomarker to predict OS and PFS in NSCLC patients treated with RT. These findings require prospective studies to evaluate the role of such prognostic marker to identify patients at risk to tailor interventions.

Reduced-dose radiation in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma can improve outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Despite its effectiveness, the standard course of chemoradiation for the treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) results in considerable treatment-related adverse effects. Studies proved that HPV-positive OPC is very sensitive to radiotherapy. Using de-escalation therapy as a new strategy is critical to maintaining positive outcomes while alleviating side effects. However, some studies hold that reduced dose causes insufficient effect on tumor killing. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and adverse reactions in patients with HPV-related OPC by retrospective analysis and evaluated the therapeutic effect of reducing the radiation dose. Methods: Data were double-selected and extracted by searching seven electronic databases, Original studies in all language treated HPV-associated OPC with reduced-dose and standard-dose therapies were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence rates of adverse events were obtained by pooling analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio Version 1.1.383 (RStudio, Boston, MA, USA) via the Meta-Analysis R Package (metafor). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic and the Cochran Q test. We used Stata (version 15.0) for forest graph. Results: Thirteen studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving a dose range of 66-70 Gy for the standard treatment regimen and <66 Gy for the reduced-dose group. There was no significant difference in the age of the patients in the standard and the reduced treatment groups (60.9±5.9 vs. 58.6±2.4 years). Nine studies were included as standard cohort and thirteen studies were enrolled as reduced-dose cohort. The 2- and 3-year overall survival rates in the reduced-dose group (95.66% and 91.51%, respectively) were superior to those in the standard-dose group (88.36% and 87.46%, respectively). There was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups. A systematic review of articles on dose reduction and the standard dose was also conducted. The most common complication in reduced-dose radiation was oral mucositis (36.4%), followed by decreased white blood cell (WBC) count (30.5%) and dry mouth (29.1%). Conclusions: Reducing the radiation dose in patients with HPV-related OPC substantially alleviates the treatment toxicities and optimizes the quality of life of patients while at the same time maintaining favorable oncologic outcomes.