Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-970003

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION@#Three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been recommended for cancer patients to reduce the risk of severe disease. Anti-neoplastic treatment, such as chemotherapy, may affect long-term vaccine immunogenicity.@*METHOD@#Patients with solid or haematological cancer were recruited from 2 hospitals between July 2021 and March 2022. Humoral response was evaluated using GenScript cPASS surrogate virus neutralisation assays. Clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records and national mandatory-reporting databases.@*RESULTS@#A total of 273 patients were recruited, with 40 having haematological malignancies and the rest solid tumours. Among the participants, 204 (74.7%) were receiving active cancer therapy, including 98 (35.9%) undergoing systemic chemotherapy and the rest targeted therapy or immunotherapy. All patients were seronegative at baseline. Seroconversion rates after receiving 1, 2 and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were 35.2%, 79.4% and 92.4%, respectively. After 3 doses, patients on active treatment for haematological malignancies had lower antibodies (57.3%±46.2) when compared to patients on immunotherapy (94.1%±9.56, P<0.05) and chemotherapy (92.8%±18.1, P<0.05). SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 77 (28.2%) patients, of which 18 were severe. No patient receiving a third dose within 90 days of the second dose experienced severe infection.@*CONCLUSION@#This study demonstrates the benefit of early administration of the third dose among cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Vacunación , ARN Mensajero , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal
2.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21264126

RESUMEN

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of COVID 19 vaccines between those with immunocompromised medical conditions and those who are immunocompetent DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CORD-19 and WHO COVID-19 research databases were searched for eligible comparative studies published between 1 December 2020 and 3 September 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched in September 2021 to identify registered yet unpublished or ongoing studies. Study selectionProspective observational studies which compared the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination between those with immunocompromising medical conditions and those who were immunocompetent were included. Two reviewers independently screened for potentially eligible studies. Data extractionThe primary outcomes of interest were cumulative incidence of seroconversion after first and second doses of COVID vaccination. Secondary outcomes included SARS-CoV-2 antibody titre level after first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccination. After duplicate data abstraction, a frequentist random effects meta-analysis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. ResultsAfter screening 3283 studies, 42 studies that met our inclusion criteria were identified. 18 immunocompromised cohorts from 17 studies reported seroconversion in immunocompromised patients compared to healthy controls after the first dose and 30 immunocompromised cohorts in 28 studies reporting data after the second dose. Among immunocompromised groups, in incremental order, transplant recipients had the lowest pooled risk ratio of 0.06 (95%CI: 0.04 to 0.09, I^2=0%, p=0.81) (GRADE=Moderate) followed by haematological cancer patients at 0.36 (95%CI: 0.21 to 0.62, I^2 = 89%, p<0.01) (GRADE=Moderate), solid cancer patients at 0.40 (95%CI: 0.31 to 0.52, I^2 = 63%, p=0.03) (GRADE=Moderate) and IMID patients at 0.66 (95%CI: 0.48 to 0.91, I^2=81%, p<0.01) (GRADE=Moderate). After the second dose, the lowest pooled risk ratio was again seen in transplant recipients at 0.29 (95%CI: 0.21 to 0.40, I^2=91%, p<0.01) (GRADE=Moderate), haematological cancer patients at 0.68 (95%CI: 0.57 to 0.80, I^2=68%, p=0.02) (GRADE=Low), IMID patients at 0.79 (95%CI: 0.72 to 0.86, I^2=87%, p<0.01) (GRADE=Low) and solid cancer at 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89 to 0.95, I^2=26%, p=0.25) (GRADE=Low). ConclusionSeroconversion rates and serological titres are significantly lower in immunocompromised patients with transplant recipients having the poorest outcomes. Additional strategies on top of the conventional 2-dose regimen will likely be warranted, such as a booster dose of the vaccine. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42021272088

3.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21261295

RESUMEN

ObjectivesHighly effective vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed but variants of concerns (VOCs) with mutations in the spike protein are worrisome, especially B.1.617.2 (Delta) which has rapidly spread across the world. We aim to study if vaccination alters virological and serological kinetics in breakthrough infections. MethodsWe conducted a multi-centre retrospective cohort study of patients in Singapore who had received a licensed mRNA vaccine and been admitted to hospital with B.1.617.2 SARS-CoV-2 infection. We compared the clinical features, virological and serological kinetics (anti-nucleocapsid, anti-spike and surrogate virus neutralization titres) between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. ResultsOf 218 individuals with B.1.617.2 infection, 84 had received a mRNA vaccine of which 71 were fully vaccinated, 130 were unvaccinated and 4 received a non-mRNA. Despite significantly older age in the vaccine breakthrough group, the odds of severe COVID-19 requiring oxygen supplementation was significantly lower following vaccination (adjusted odds ratio 0.07 95%CI: 0.015-0.335, p=0.001). PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were similar between both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups at diagnosis, but viral loads decreased faster in vaccinated individuals. Early, robust boosting of anti-spike protein antibodies was observed in vaccinated patients, however, these titers were significantly lower against B.1.617.2 as compared with the wildtype vaccine strain. ConclusionThe mRNA vaccines are highly effective at preventing symptomatic and severe COVID-19 associated with B.1.617.2 infection. Vaccination is associated with faster decline in viral RNA load and a robust serological response. Vaccination remains a key strategy for control of COVID-19 pandemic.

4.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21259321

RESUMEN

ObjectivesWe aimed to harness IDentif.AI 2.0, a clinically actionable AI platform to rapidly pinpoint and prioritize optimal combination therapy regimens against COVID-19. MethodsA pool of starting candidate therapies was developed in collaboration with a community of infectious disease clinicians and included EIDD-1931 (metabolite of EIDD-2801), baricitinib, ebselen, selinexor, masitinib, nafamostat mesylate, telaprevir (VX-950), SN-38 (metabolite of irinotecan), imatinib mesylate, remdesivir, lopinavir, and ritonavir. Following the initial drug pool assessment, a focused, 6-drug pool was interrogated at 3 dosing levels per drug representing nearly 10,000 possible combination regimens. IDentif.AI 2.0 paired prospective, experimental validation of multi-drug efficacy on a SARS-CoV-2 live virus (propagated, original strain, B.1.351 and B.1.617.2 variants) and Vero E6 assay with a quadratic optimization workflow. ResultsWithin 3 weeks, IDentif.AI 2.0 realized a list of combination regimens, ranked by efficacy, for clinical go/no-go regimen recommendations. IDentif.AI 2.0 revealed EIDD-1931 to be a strong candidate upon which multiple drug combinations can be derived. ConclusionsIDentif.AI 2.0 rapidly revealed promising drug combinations for clinical translation. It pinpointed dose-dependent drug synergy behavior to play a role in trial design and realizing positive treatment outcomes. IDentif.AI 2.0 represents an actionable path towards rapidly optimizing combination therapy following pandemic emergence. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21259321v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f8a159org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12908b7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fb6485org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8493c3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Highlights- When novel pathogens emerge, the immediate strategy is to repurpose drugs. - Good drugs delivered together in suboptimal combinations and doses can yield low or no efficacy, leading to misperception that the drugs are ineffective. - IDentif.AI 2.0 does not use in silico modeling or pre-existing data. - IDentif.AI 2.0 pairs optimization with prospectively acquired experimental data using a SARS-CoV-2/Vero E6 assay. - IDentif.AI 2.0 pinpoints EIDD-1931 as a foundation for optimized anti-SARS-CoV-2 combination therapies.

5.
Infection and Chemotherapy ; : 391-394, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-890900

RESUMEN

There have been recent descriptions of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting as ‘varicella-like exanthem’. We report three cases of patients with VaricellaZoster Virus (VZV) and COVID-19 co-infections, presenting in three varied ways. These cases highlight the need for heightened alertness to how such co-infections can present, to pick up overlapping ‘dual pathologies’ during this current pandemic given that infection control measures including airborne precautions are crucial for both COVID-19 and VZV.

6.
Infection and Chemotherapy ; : 391-394, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-898604

RESUMEN

There have been recent descriptions of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting as ‘varicella-like exanthem’. We report three cases of patients with VaricellaZoster Virus (VZV) and COVID-19 co-infections, presenting in three varied ways. These cases highlight the need for heightened alertness to how such co-infections can present, to pick up overlapping ‘dual pathologies’ during this current pandemic given that infection control measures including airborne precautions are crucial for both COVID-19 and VZV.

7.
Preprint en Inglés | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-015461

RESUMEN

The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic demands rapid identification of immunogenic targets for the design of efficient vaccines and serological detection tools. In this report, using pools of overlapping linear peptides and functional assays, we present two immunodominant regions on the spike glycoprotein that were highly recognized by neutralizing antibodies in the sera of COVID-19 convalescent patients. One is highly specific to SARS-CoV-2, and the other is a potential pan-coronavirus target.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...