Immunoglobulin levels amongst persons with and without human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in Uganda and Norway.

CD4+-cell count and viral load monitoring are expensive and unavailable to most human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people in Africa. In an attempt to evaluate alternative methods for monitoring antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, we measured concentrations of immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgM, IgG and IgG1 amongst adults with and without HIV in Uganda and Norway. We adjusted for disease severity by stratifying HIV-positive subjects on CD4+-cell counts above and below 200 cells/ micro l. Median serum levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgA were significantly higher in HIV-positive persons compared with HIV-negative persons in both countries (P < 0.001 and P = 0.018 for IgA in Ugandan patients). Levels of IgA in Ugandan HIV-negative subjects were significantly lower than those in HIV-positive subjects with low CD4+ compared with those with high CD4+-cell counts (P < 0.001 and P = 0.069, respectively). IgM levels were different between the HIV-negative and the two HIV-positive groups in Norway (P < 0.001). The mean levels of IgM, IgG and IgG1 in HIV-negative and -positive African subjects were generally higher than those in comparable groups of Western subjects. Our results verify that levels of IgA, IgG and IgG1 vary between HIV-negative and -positive individuals in both study populations. Their determination may be useful in monitoring both disease progression and response to ARV therapy.

Operational assessment of isoniazid prophylaxis in a community AIDS service organisation in Uganda.

SETTING: Isoniazid therapy was shown to be 70% effective at preventing tuberculosis in HIV-infected, PPD-positive Ugandan adults, but the feasibility of implementation outside an efficacy trial has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To study uptake, adherence and feasibility of a 6-month course of isoniazid preventive therapy in community-based HIV clinics in Uganda. DESIGN: Observational cohort study describing selection of patients and adherence to isoniazid 300 mg daily. Adherence was measured by clinic attendance, pill counts and urine isoniazid metabolite testing. Implementation was costed on a service delivery basis. RESULTS: Of 1597 cohort members, 22% were PPD-positive. Over 18 months, 193 PPD-positive individuals were assessed for prophylaxis and 98 (51%) were enrolled. Of those enrolled, 74 (76%) completed their course of isoniazid therapy, and 80% were fully adherent. Symptoms or previous treatment for tuberculosis and suspicion of tuberculous lymphadenopathy were the main reasons for exclusion. The additional cost of providing this service was US $14,549. CONCLUSION: Clinics specialising in the care of persons with HIV/AIDS can successfully implement isoniazid prophylaxis. Difficulties in excluding active tuberculosis and the costs of running the programme may limit its widespread implementation.