RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study applies a simulation technique to evaluate the hypothesis that red light cameras (RLCs) exert important effects on accident risks. Conflict occurrences are generated by simulation and compared at intersections with and without RLCs to assess the impact of RLCs on several conflict types under various traffic conditions. METHOD: Conflict occurrences are generated through simulating vehicular interactions based on an improved cellular automata (CA) model. The CA model is calibrated and validated against field observations at approaches with and without RLCs. Simulation experiments are conducted for RLC and non-RLC intersections with different geometric layouts and traffic demands to generate conflict occurrences that are analyzed to evaluate the hypothesis that RLCs exert important effects on road safety. RESULTS: The comparison of simulated conflict occurrences show favorable safety impacts of RLCs on crossing conflicts and unfavorable impacts for rear-end conflicts during red/amber phases. Corroborative results are found from broad analysis of accident occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: RLCs are found to have a mixed effect on accident risk at signalized intersections: crossing collisions are reduced, whereas rear-end collisions may increase. The specially developed CA model is found to be a feasible safety assessment tool.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito/prevención & control , Conducción de Automóvil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aplicación de la Ley/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Fotograbar , Seguridad , Calibración , Simulación por Computador , Planificación Ambiental , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
This paper reports a before-and-after study which evaluated the impacts of installing and operating red light cameras at two "T" and one "X" signalized intersections on driver stopping propensity upon the onset of amber. Rather than using video cameras, a special purpose data logger working in conjunction with loop sensors was used to gather traffic parameters, vehicle stopping/crossing movements, and signal phases. Logistic modeling was employed to model the revealed stopping/crossing decisions of non-platoon vehicle drivers in response to the onset of amber with traffic, situational and behavioral variables, including their interactions. The results indicate that the variable Cam_Inst that gathered the impacts of red light camera (RLC) installation on driver decision-making at signalized intersection was significant at 5% level only for the camera approach model of the cross-intersection. The significance of Cam_Inst was undermined for the camera approaches at the T-intersections by the inclusion of a significant two-order variable defining the interaction of Cam_Inst with distance from the stop-line. One may, thus, infer that RLC has a fixed-quantum effect at the cross-intersection, but an accentuated effect with distance at the two T-intersections. Lastly, the effects of a RLC at an intersection on the stopping decision at the non-camera approaches were minimal.
Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Toma de Decisiones , Control Social Formal , Grabación en Video , Conducción de Automóvil/psicología , Humanos , Aplicación de la Ley/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Oportunidad Relativa , SingapurRESUMEN
PROBLEM: This paper evaluates the stopping propensity of drivers at matured in-service red light camera (RLC) signalized T-intersections after a number of years of camera operation. METHOD: A special-purpose data logger working in conjunction with loop sensors was used to gather traffic parameters, vehicle stopping/crossing movements, and signal phases at camera (treatment) and noncamera (comparison) approaches. Logistic modeling was employed to determine the stopping/crossing decisions of civilian vehicle drivers in response to the onset of yellow (amber) with traffic and the associated situational and behavioral variables, including their interactions. SUMMARY: The propensity to stop at camera approaches was about 17 times more than at noncamera approaches. This finding strongly affirmed the positive effect of RLC in encouraging drivers to stop. The likelihood to stop was about 6.5 times higher for an approach that faces an opposing right-turn conflict immediately after the onset of red. Higher stopping propensity was also more prevalent during weekdays and in periods of low traffic volumes. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: The findings provided an objective measure on the effectiveness of RLC that would be useful to evaluate intersections for camera installation as well as on the implementation and operational aspects of RLC program.