RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists regarding efficacy and safety of diuretic regimens in ambulatory, congestion-refractory, chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare the potency and safety of commonly used diuretic regimens in CHF patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study conducted in NYHA functional class II to IV CHF patients, treated in an ambulatory day-care unit. Each patient received 3 different diuretic regimens: intravenous (IV) furosemide 250 mg; IV furosemide 250 mg plus oral metolazone 5 mg; and IV furosemide 250 mg plus IV acetazolamide 500 mg. Treatments were administered once a week, in 1 of 6 randomized sequences. The primary endpoint was total sodium excretion, and the secondary was total urinary volume excreted, both measured for 6 hours post-treatment initiation. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were recruited. Administration of furosemide plus metolazone resulted in the highest weight of sodium excreted, 4,691 mg (95% CI: 4,153-5,229 mg) compared with furosemide alone, 3,835 mg (95% CI: 3,279-4,392 mg; P = 0.015) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide 3,584 mg (95% CI: 3,020-4,148 mg; P = 0.001). Furosemide plus metolazone resulted in 1.84 L of urine (95% CI: 1.63-2.05 L), compared with 1.58 L (95% CI: 1.37-1.8); P = 0.039 collected following administration of furosemide plus acetazolamide and 1.71 L (95% CI: 1.49-1.93 L) following furosemide alone. The incidence of worsening renal function was significantly higher when adding metolazone (39%) to furosemide compared with furosemide alone (16%) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide (2.6%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ambulatory CHF patients, furosemide plus metolazone resulted in a significantly higher natriuresis compared with IV furosemide alone or furosemide plus acetazolamide.
Asunto(s)
Acetazolamida , Estudios Cruzados , Diuréticos , Furosemida , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Metolazona , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Furosemida/administración & dosificación , Furosemida/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Diuréticos/administración & dosificación , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Acetazolamida/administración & dosificación , Acetazolamida/uso terapéutico , Metolazona/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Diuresis/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This focused review describes the current knowledge of the association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and as well as venous thromboembolism this disease shares inflammatory mechanisms with IBD. Patients with IBD have a high risk of venous thromboembolism especially during IBD flare-ups. Their risk of arterial cardiovascular disease may also be increased. The risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with IBD warrants clinical attention, and it is possible that the risk can be modified by applying anti-inflammatory therapy.