Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hereditas ; 161(1): 27, 2024 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192374

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are capable of affecting breast cancer (BC) development. However, the role and underneath mechanism of circFKBP8 (also known as hsa_circ_0000915) in BC remain largely unknown. METHODS: Expression analyses were performed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blot, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. Effects on cell functional phenotypes were determined by assessing cell proliferation, migratory capacity, invasion, and stemness in vitro. The relationship between microRNA (miR)-432-5p and circFKBP8 or E2F transcription factor 7 (E2F7) was examined by RNA pull-down, dual-luciferase reporter, and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays. Xenograft assays were used to identify the function of circFKBP8 in vivo. RESULTS: CircFKBP8 was presented at high levels in BC tissues and cells. High circFKBP8 expression was associated with worse overall survival in BC patients. CircFKBP8 suppression inhibited BC cell proliferation, migratory capacity, invasion and stemness in vitro. CircFKBP8 suppression blocked xenograft tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, circFKBP8 functioned as a miR-432-5p sponge to modulate E2F7 expression. CircFKBP8 modulated BC cell malignant behaviors by miR-432-5p, and miR-432-5p affected these cell phenotypes through E2F7. CONCLUSION: Our observations prove that circFKBP8 promotes BC malignant phenotypes through the miR-432-5p/E2F7 cascade, offering a promising therapeutic and prognostic target for BC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Proliferación Celular , Factor de Transcripción E2F7 , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , MicroARNs , ARN Circular , MicroARNs/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , ARN Circular/genética , Femenino , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Factor de Transcripción E2F7/genética , Factor de Transcripción E2F7/metabolismo , Ratones , Movimiento Celular , Redes Reguladoras de Genes
2.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 1031, 2024 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39169295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Does incorporating Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors into endocrine therapy (ET) effectively enhance survival outcomes, notably overall survival (OS), among individuals with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer? This remains a clinical controversy. We compared the antitumor efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) between CDK4/6 inhibitors + ET (CET) and placebo + ET (PET) by conducting a phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based meta-analysis. METHODS: Seven databases were searched to identify eligible studies, comprising Phase III RCTs comparing CET to PET. The primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including responses and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Seven RCTs (DAWNA-2, MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, MONALEESA-7, MONARCH-3, PALOMA-2, and PALOMA-4) were included. The CET group exhibited significantly improved OS (HR: 0.81 [0.74, 0.88]), PFS (HR: 0.57 [0.52, 0.63]), objective response rate (RR: 1.31 [1.20, 1.43]), and clinical benefit rate (RR: 1.11 [1.07, 1.15]). These benefits were consistent across almost all subgroups. Additionally, the CET group showed better overall survival rates (OSR) from 24 to 60 months (OSR 24-60 m) and progression-free survival rates (PFSR) from 6 to 60 months (PFSR 6-60 m). However, more total AEs, grade 3-5 AEs, and serious AEs were found in CET group. The top 5 grade 3-5 AEs in the CET group were neutropenia (59.39%), leukopenia (24.11%), decreased white blood cell count (12.99%), hypertension (7.03%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (5.91%). CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of CET over PET in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer is evident, showing improved survival and responses. Nonetheless, the higher incidence of AEs, specifically hematologic AEs, requires cautious attention.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de la Mama , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Receptor ErbB-2 , Femenino , Humanos , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA