The effect of regular physical activity on the left ventricle systolic function in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of aerobic training on the left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Thirty patients with stable coronary artery disease, who had participated in the conducted 3-month physical training, were retrospectively divided into 2 cohorts. While patients in the cohort I (n=14) had continued training individually for 12 months, patients in the cohort II (n=16) had stopped training after finishing the conducted program. Rest and stress dobutamine/atropine echocardiography was performed in all patients before the training program and 1 year later. The peak systolic velocities of mitral annulus (Sa) were assessed by tissue Doppler imaging for individual LV walls. In addition, to determine global LV systolic longitudinal function, the four-site mean systolic velocity was calculated (Sa glob). According to the blood supply, left ventricular walls were divided into 5 groups: A- walls supplied by nonstenotic artery; B- walls supplied by coronary artery with stenosis ≤50 %; C- walls supplied by coronary artery with stenosis 51-70 %; D- walls with stenosis of supplying artery 71-99 %; and E- walls with totally occluded supplying artery. In global systolic function, the follow-up values of Sa glob in cohort I were improved by 0.23±0.36 as compared with baseline values at rest, and by 1.26±0.65 cm/s at the maximal load, while the values of Sa glob in cohort II were diminished by 0.53±0.22 (p=NS), and by 1.25±0.45 cm/s (p<0.05), respectively. Concerning the resting regional function, the only significant difference between cohorts in follow-up changes was found in walls E: 0.37±0.60 versus -1.76±0.40 cm/s (p<0.05). At the maximal load, the significant difference was found only in walls A (0.16±0.84 versus -2.67±0.87 cm/s; p<0.05). Patients with regular 12-month physical activity improved their global left ventricle systolic function mainly due to improvement of contractility in walls supplied by a totally occluded coronary artery.

[Differentiated approach to prescription of physical activity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction]. / Diferencovaný prístup k preskripci fyzické aktivity u nemocných s dysfunkcí levé komory srdecní.

Correctly indicated physical exercise performed and controlled on a regular basis is an inseparable part of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with left ventricular dysfunction. In order to guarantee the best effect and safety of physical exercise, it is necessary to adopt a differential approach to its prescription to patients with different degrees of functional damage. In addition, a number of conditions should be fulfilled, among which, in the first place, the determination of functional classification of patients used in practice and described in the relevant literature (NYHA, AMA, Goldman, Weber). Physical exercise cannot be differentiated only with respect to the degree of dysfunction; other conditioning factors should be taken into consideration, too, among which the relative contraindication of physical strain, somatic condition, physical exercise anamnesis and others (i.e. sex, age, motivation, etc.), causing a high degree of patient heterogeneity. Also described are additional conditions for differentiation and correct application of physical training, which involve the selection of suitable types of exercise and their energetic demands, adequate intensity, frequency and duration; it is also important to determine the available effective and safe methods, programmes and means of training. The article contains examples of the above conditions, as well as classification of physical exercise into functional classes NYHA I-IV. In conclusion, the authors point out the necessity of differentiation of physical training and of cooperation of the cardiologist with the physiotherapist in its indication, implementation and monitoring.

CIRCADIAN BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY AND EXERCISE THERAPY.

The objective of this study was to find if there was a relationship between the time when cardiovascular rehabilitation was running in the patients after myocardial infarction and an average daily value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 7-day ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Systolic and diastolic pressures significantly increased in patients who underwent cardiovascular rehabilitation in the morning from 9.00 a.m. to 10.15 a.m., and significantly decreased in those who did their physical exercise in the afternoon from 1.30 p.m. to 2.45 p.m., compared to their blood pressure values on days without rehabilitation.

[Interval and continuous training in cardiovascular rehabilitation]. / Intervalový a kontinuální trénink v kardiovaskulární rehabilitaci.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the physiological effectiveness and the influence of two modifications of aerobic training (interval and continuous) on the physical performance in the patients with coronary heart disease. 38 males with coronary heart disease (age 60 +/- 10.2 years) passed three months training programme of 60 min 3 times a week (10 min of warm up phase, 25 min of aerobic phase, 15 min of resistance training, 10 min of relaxing phase). Patients with coronarographically verified stenosis > 50% luminal diameter and/or left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 40 % (n = 22) had in terms of aerobic phase interval training prescribed (30 second work phases with work load intensity on the level of anaerobic threshold alternating with 60 second recovery phases with intensity of 5 W); other patients (n = 16) passed aerobic phase of the programme with continual work load of intensity on the level of ventilatory anaerobic threshold. After the determination of three month rehabilitation programme the maximal achieved performance as well as aerobic capacity evaluated by spiroergometric examination statistically significantly increased in the group of patients with interval training and also in the group with continuous training. Despite the group with interval training performed 2.5-3 times less work in each training unit (p < 0.01), the performance and aerobic capacity parameters after the termination of three month programme did not statistically significantly differ from the group with continuous training. The advantage of the continuous training is a possibility to achieve an improvement also in the patients with left ventricular dysfunction and chronic coronary heart disease who could have worse tolerance of the continual work load.