RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Swedish Lymphoma Register (SLR) was initiated in the year 2000 with the aim to monitor quality of care in diagnostics, treatment and outcome of all lymphomas diagnosed nationally among adults. Here, we present the first systematic validation of SLR records as a basis for improved register quality and patient care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated timeliness and completeness of register records among patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the SLR (n = 16,905) compared with the National Cancer Register for the period 2013-2020. Comparability was assessed through evaluation of coding routines against national and international guidelines. Accuracy of 42 variables was evaluated through re-abstraction of data from medical records among 600 randomly selected patients diagnosed in 2016-2017 and treated across all six Swedish healthcare regions. Results: Completeness was high, >95% per year for the period 2013-2018, and >89% for 2019-2020 compared to the National Cancer Register. One in four patients was registered within 3 months, and 89.9% within 2 years of diagnosis. Registration instructions and coding procedures followed the prespecified guidelines. Missingness was generally low (<5%), but high for occasional variables, for example, those describing maintenance and consolidative treatment. Exact agreement of categorical variables was high overall (>80% for 24/34 variables), especially for treatment-related data (>80% for 17/19 variables). INTERPRETATION: Completeness and accuracy are high in the SLR, while timeliness could be improved. Finetuning of variable registration guided by this validation can further improve reliability of register reports and advance service to lymphoma patients and health care in the future.
Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Linfoma , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Linfoma/terapia , Linfoma/epidemiología , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normasRESUMEN
Routine follow-up for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma have been shortened to 2 years when event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24) emerged as a new milestone. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether the achievement of this milestone affected overall survival (OS). We compared OS to that of an age- and sex-matched population, analysed other factors governing OS, and reviewed the causes of death. Data were collected from the Swedish Cancer Registry and from individual patient's records. We included 1169 adult patients from five counties between the years 2001 and 2014. The median (range) age was 64·6 (18-91) years, 56·6% were men and the median follow-up was 82·3 months. For early stages, the achievement of EFS12 did not improve OS. More than two-thirds of the patients (n = 837, 71·6%) achieved EFS24, of which 190 (22·7%) died during follow-up. Lymphoma (20%), cardiovascular disease (22·4%) and malignancies (16%) contributed to causes of death. Patients aged <60 years had an OS that matched the standard population. In multivariate analysis, only age >60 years significantly affected OS after EFS24 compared with the standard population. We concluded that follow-up beyond EFS24 should be considered for patients aged >60 years.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ciclofosfamida , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología , VincristinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular toxicity is a notorious complication of doxorubicin (DXR) therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although surveillance of well-known biological markers for cardiovascular disease (CVD) as NTproBNP and Troponins may be helpful, there are no established markers to monitor for evolving CVD during treatment. New possibilities have arisen with the emergence of newer techniques allowing for analysis of plasma proteins that can be associated with cardiovascular disease. Proximity Extension Assay is one of them. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to illustrate the incidence of CVD in DLBCL patients treated with DXR and to establish whether there are plasma proteins associated with pre-existing or emerging CVD. METHODS: In 95 patients, 182 different proteins from OLINK panels, NTproBNP, Troponin I and CRP were assessed prior to, during and after treatment. For comparison, samples from controls were analyzed. RESULTS: In the DLBCL cohort, 33.3% had pre-treatment CVD compared to 5.0% in the controls and 23.2% developed new CVD. Of the 32.6% who died during follow up, CVD was the cause in 4 patients. Spondin-1 (SPON-1) correlated to pre-treatment CVD (1.22 fold change, 95% CI 1.10-1.35, p = 0.00025, q = 0.045). Interleukin-1 receptor type 1 (IL-1RT1) was associated to emerging CVD (1.24 fold change, 95% CI 1.10-1.39, p = 0.00044, q = 0.082). CONCLUSION: We observed a higher prevalence of CVD in DLBCL patients compared to controls prior to DXR therapy. Two proteins, SPON-1 and IL-1RT1, were related to pre-existing and emerging CVD in DXR treated patients. If confirmed in larger cohorts, IL-1RT1 may emerge as a reliable biomarker for unfolding CVD in DLBCL.
RESUMEN
Background: Patients with certain autoimmune diseases (AID) have an increased risk of developing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the occurrence of AID in patients with DLBCL as well as the impact of AID on outcome has not been extensively studied. The main purpose of this study was to establish the occurrence of AIDs in a population-based cohort of DLBCL patients and to compare outcomes in patients with or without AID treated with rituximab(R)-CHOP/CHOP-like treatment. We also aimed to analyse gender differences and the potential role of different AIDs on outcome and the frequency of treatment-associated neutropenic fever. Patients and methods: All adult patients treated 2000-2013 with R-CHOP/CHOP-like treatment for DLBCL in four counties of Sweden were included (n = 612). Lymphoma characteristics, outcome and the presence of AID were obtained through medical records. Results: The number of patients with AID was 106 (17.3%). Thyroid disease dominated (n = 33, 31.1%) followed by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 24, 22.6%). The proportion of AID was significantly higher in females (59/254, 23.2%) vs. in males (47/358, 13.1%) (p = .001). In the whole cohort there was no difference in event free survival (EFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with or without AID. However, patients with an AID primarily mediated by B-cell responses (thyroid disorders excluded) had a worse OS (p = .037), which seemed to affect only women. The AID group more often had neutropenic fever after first treatment (16.0% vs 8.7%, p = .034) and those with neutropenic fever had a worse OS (p = .026) in Kaplan-Meier analyses. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of AID among patients with DLBCL. AIDs categorized as primarily B-cell mediated (in this study mainly RA, systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome) may be associated with inferior OS. AID patients may be more prone to neutropenic fever compared to patients without concomitant AID.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/epidemiología , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/complicaciones , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/etiología , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/etiología , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Masculino , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The standard treatment for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine (VCR), and prednisone). Maintaining high dose intensity of cytotoxic treatment has been associated with better outcome but little is known about the role of maintaining VCR. This study aimed to answer whether the omission of vincristine due to neurotoxicity affects patient outcome. A Swedish cohort of patients primarily treated with curative intent for DLBCL or high-grade malignant B cell lymphoma was retrospectively analyzed. In total, 541 patients treated between 2000 and 2013 were included. Omission of VCR was decided in 95 (17.6%) patients and was more often decided during the last three cycles (n = 86, 90.5%). The omission of VCR did not affect disease-free or overall survival neither in the whole cohort nor in elderly patients. On the contrary, the relative dose intensity of doxorubicin was associated with overall survival (p = 0.014). Kidney or adrenal involvement (p = 0.014) as well as bulky disease (p = 0.037) was found to be associated with worse overall survival. According to our results, clinicians can safely decide to omit VCR in case of severe neurotoxicity due to VCR but should be aware of the importance of giving adequate doses of doxorubicin during treatment given the growing body of evidence on the role of dose intensity on survival. Considering the association of bulky disease and kidney/adrenal manifestation of lymphoma on survival, further studies should focus on whether the treatment options for these subgroups need to be individualized.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Vincristina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología , Vincristina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The aim of the current retrospective study was to validate a predictive model for radiation pneumonitis (STRIPE) in an independent dataset and to investigate whether the addition of other potential risk factors could strengthen the accuracy of the model. Consecutive patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC; n=71) treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy were retrospectively assessed for radiation pneumonitis (RP). The results identified that 16 (23%) patients developed grade ≥2 RP. Furthermore, STRIPE score (intermediate vs. low risk) was independently associated with the development of RP [odds ratio (OR), 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-13.89], whereas current smoking status was found to be protective against RP (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.78). Similar discriminatory power of the STRIPE score was observed as in the original study. The addition of smoking status strengthened the model's discriminatory ability to predict RP. Thus, the addition of smoking status as a risk factor may strengthen the accuracy of the model for predicting RP in patients with NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Ascitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Ascitis/diagnóstico , Ascitis/etiología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Linfoma de Células del Manto/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células del Manto/diagnóstico , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of first-line treatment with combination versus single agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and performance status (PS) 2. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized trials comparing combination versus single agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced NCSLC. Both trials dedicated to PS 2 patients and trials that performed a subset analysis according to PS were included in the meta-analysis. Standard meta-analytic procedures were used to analyze the study outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve trials were considered eligible and were further analyzed. The use of combination chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant better overall survival compared to single agent chemotherapy (11 trials, 1114 patients; hazard ratio (HR), 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.88). The survival benefit was pronounced when platinum-based combination was used (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61-0.81) while no survival benefit was observed in non-platinum based combinations (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.15). Grade 3/4 anemia (OR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.55-6.27), thrombocytopenia (OR: 12.81, 95% CI: 4.65-33.10), and neutropenia (OR: 7.91, 95% CI: 3.97-15.78) but not febrile neutropenia were significantly more frequent with combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the use of combination chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and PS 2. However, the patients should be informed about the higher risk for toxicity with the combination chemotherapy and the final treatment strategy should be individualized.