Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
ACS Med Chem Lett ; 8(5): 582-586, 2017 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28523115

RESUMEN

Further optimization of an initial DP2 receptor antagonist clinical candidate NVP-QAV680 led to the discovery of a follow-up molecule 2-(2-methyl-1-(4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)acetic acid (compound 11, NVP-QAW039, fevipiprant), which exhibits improved potency on human eosinophils and Th2 cells, together with a longer receptor residence time, and is currently in clinical trials for severe asthma.

3.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett ; 24(17): 4341-7, 2014 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25065493

RESUMEN

The optimisation of two series of 4-hydroxybenzothiazolone derived ß2-adrenoceptor agonists, bearing α-substituted cyclopentyl and ß-phenethyl amino-substituents, as inhaled long-acting bronchodilators is described. Analogues were selected for synthesis using a lipophilicity based hypothesis to achieve the targeted rapid onset of action in combination with a long duration of action. The profiling of the two series led to identification of the α-substituted cyclopentyl analogue 2 as the optimal compound with a comparable profile to the inhaled once-daily long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist indacaterol. On the basis of these data 2 was promoted as the backup development candidate to indacaterol from the Novartis LABA project.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/farmacología , Benzotiazoles/administración & dosificación , Benzotiazoles/farmacología , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/metabolismo , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/química , Animales , Benzotiazoles/química , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Cobayas , Estructura Molecular
4.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 13(3): 978-89, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22798037

RESUMEN

The purpose of this article is to review the suitability of the analytical and statistical techniques that have thus far been developed to assess the dissolution behavior of particles in the respirable aerodynamic size range, as generated by orally inhaled products (OIPs) such as metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The review encompasses all analytical techniques publicized to date, namely, those using paddle-over-disk USP 2 dissolution apparatus, flow-through cell dissolution apparatus, and diffusion cell apparatus. The available techniques may have research value for both industry and academia, especially when developing modified-release formulations. The choice of a method should be guided by the question(s) that the research strives to answer, as well as by the strengths and weaknesses of the available techniques. There is still insufficient knowledge, however, for translating the dissolution data into statements about quality, performance, safety, or efficacy of OIPs in general. Any attempts to standardize a dissolution method for compendial inclusion or compendial use would therefore be premature. This review reinforces and expands on the 2008 stimulus article of the USP Inhalation Ad Hoc Advisory Panel, which "could not find compelling evidence suggesting that such dissolution testing is kinetically and/or clinically crucial for currently approved inhalation drug products."


Asunto(s)
Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/metabolismo , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Aerosoles/metabolismo , Solubilidad
5.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev ; 63(1-2): 69-87, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21144875

RESUMEN

Dosimetry, safety and the efficacy of drugs in the lungs are critical factors in the development of inhaled medicines. This article considers the challenges in each of these areas with reference to current industry practices for developing inhaled products, and suggests collaborative scientific approaches to address these challenges. The portfolio of molecules requiring delivery by inhalation has expanded rapidly to include novel drugs for lung disease, combination therapies, biopharmaceuticals and candidates for systemic delivery via the lung. For these drugs to be developed as inhaled medicines, a better understanding of their fate in the lungs and how this might be modified is required. Harmonized approaches based on 'best practice' are advocated for dosimetry and safety studies; this would provide coherent data to help product developers and regulatory agencies differentiate new inhaled drug products. To date, there are limited reports describing full temporal relationships between pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) measurements. A better understanding of pulmonary PK and PK/PD relationships would help mitigate the risk of not engaging successfully or persistently with the drug target as well as identifying the potential for drug accumulation in the lung or excessive systemic exposure. Recommendations are made for (i) better industry-academia-regulatory co-operation, (ii) sharing of pre-competitive data, and (iii) open innovation through collaborative research in key topics such as lung deposition, drug solubility and dissolution in lung fluid, adaptive responses in safety studies, biomarker development and validation, the role of transporters in pulmonary drug disposition, target localisation within the lung and the determinants of local efficacy following inhaled drug administration.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Diseño de Fármacos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Animales , Humanos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos
6.
Bioorg Med Chem ; 12(19): 5213-24, 2004 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15351404
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA