RESUMEN
A survey of 111 urban constructed stormwater wetlands (median watershed area = 86.8 ha) was conducted to identify the major pesticides present and to determine their major catchment sources (residential, industrial, commercial, sporting ovals) and associations with catchment imperviousness. Melbourne, Australia, has separate stormwater and sewerage systems and these wetlands are designed to treat urban stormwater. To maximise the pesticides that could be detected, three types of passive samplers (POCIS, Chemcatcher® SDB-XC and Chemcatcher® C18) were deployed, along with collection of fine sediments. A total of 231 pesticides were screened using these methods. Pesticides that were detected in >5 % of wetlands were checked to determine their registered use in urban areas using an Australian government database (PubCris). Twenty-five pesticides were detected in >5 % of wetlands: 4 pesticides were associated with non-urban land uses (agriculture and forests), another 4 pesticides had no known registered use in urban areas and 17 were associated with urban areas. The pesticides associated with urban areas were the herbicides simazine, diuron, metolachlor, bromacil, propyzamide and paclobutrazol, the fungicides tebuconazole, propiconazole, metalaxyl, trifloxystrobin, iprodione and carbendazim and the insecticides fipronil, bifenthrin, chlorantraniliprole, thiamethoxam and permethrin. Atrazine was also detected in 59 % of wetlands but has not been registered for urban uses in Australia since 2010. It's presence in Melbourne may be due to legacy issues or aerial transportation from rural areas where it's still widely used in crop cultivation. Generally, the major urban catchment source of pesticides is from residential areas (particularly fipronil and simazine), most likely in wood preservatives, paints and from weed or insect control. Many of these widely used pesticides were correlated with increased catchment imperviousness. Some pesticides (bromacil and imidacloprid) were correlated with commercial premises and chlorantraniliprole was correlated with the presence of sporting ovals in the catchment. No pesticides were specifically correlated with industrial areas. The use of passive samplers and fine sediments, in conjunction with detailed land use mapping of stormwater wetland catchments is very effective and efficient in monitoring and sourcing pesticide contamination in urban environments.
Asunto(s)
Plaguicidas , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Plaguicidas/análisis , Humedales , Simazina/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Australia , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , AgriculturaRESUMEN
Aims Accurate preoperative knowledge of tumour stage is important in preoperative planning at radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to assess the predictive ability of multiparametric MRI for detecting pathological outcomes. Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent RP over a 4 year period. Results Preoperative MRI was reported as showing T3 or T4 disease in 26(17.9%) out of 145 patients undergoing RP. Of these, 10(6.9%) had ECE (extra-capsular extension) and 1(0.7%) had SVI (seminal vesicle invasion) on final histology. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting ECE were 27.3% and 87.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting SVI were 11.1% and 97.8%, respectively. The positive predictive values for determining ECE and SVI were 45.5% and 25%, respectively and negative predictive values were 75.9% and 94.4%. Conclusion MRI has good specificity but poor and heterogeneous sensitivity for predicting T3 disease in RP specimen.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of preoperative risk nomograms or detecting lymph node invasion in a cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all men (n = 145) who underwent RP between 2012 and 2015. Preoperative data was inputted to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC), Partin 2011 and Briganti nomograms and the University of California San Francisco- Centre of the Prostate Risk Assessment tool (UCSF-CAPRA). The risk of lymph node involvement (LNI) was calculated and compared to final histology. RESULTS: One hundred three (71%) men underwent a lymph node dissection at RP. Ten (9.7%) demonstrated LNI. The median nodal yield was 15 nodes, with no difference between those with LNI and those without (19.5 vs 14.5, p = 0.22).No patient classified as low risk on the UCSF-CAPRA score had evidence of LNI. In patients with LNI, no patient breached the 2% threshold for lymph node dissection (LND) on the MSKCC nomogram; four patients breached the 5% threshold on the Partin tables while three patients breached the 2.5% threshold for the Briganti nomogram. CONCLUSION: Nomograms produce useful information regarding risk of disease; however, they often have not been validated on different populations. Risk predictions need to be considered carefully and treatment decisions were made on a patient specific basis.
Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Nomogramas , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
There have been a number of exciting developments in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD) in the past decade. However the objective for the vast majority of patients remains the maintenance of quality of life through the achievement of steady levels of dopaminergic stimulation within the target neurones of the basal ganglia. While there is a great deal of guidance available for the PD specialist, it remains a challenge for the generalist to know which patients require specialist input, how urgently that input should be obtained and what steps should be taken while awaiting review. Diagnosis can be difficult in the acute setting. While a high index of suspicion is important, it is not a diagnosis that should be made lightly and all cases should be reviewed by a specialist who will then advise on initial treatment. Management of PD medication during intercurrent illness is a challenge, particularly when the gastrointestinal tract is dysfunctional. Some guidance on dealing with this situation is available and has been summarised in this article. Problems that may present to the general physician include aspiration pneumonia, uncontrolled dyskinesias, psychosis, dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome and rarely, neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome. These conditions will be reviewed, along with general guidance for managing patients on more sophisticated regimes such as continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion (Duodopa) and patients with a deep brain stimulator in situ.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Aguda , Discinesias/etiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Síndrome Neuroléptico Maligno/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The issue of when to start treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains controversial. Some favour treatment at diagnosis while others opt for a "wait and watch" policy. The effect of the latter policy on the self reported health status of people with PD is unknown. AIMS: To record self reported health status through longitudinal use of a validated PD specific questionnaire (PDQ-39) in untreated PD patients in multiple centres in the UK. To compare patients who were left untreated with those who were offered treatment during follow-up. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective, "real life" observational audit based study addressing patient reported outcomes in relation to self reported health status and other sociodemographic details. RESULTS: 198 untreated PD were assessed over a mean period of 18 months. During two follow-up assessments, the self reported health status scores in all eight domains of the PDQ-39 and the overall PDQ-39 summary index worsened significantly (p<0.01) in patients left untreated. In a comparative group in whom treatment was initiated at or soon after diagnosis, there was a trend towards improvement in self reported health status scores after treatment was started. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses for the first time self reported health status, an indicator of health related quality of life, in untreated PD. The findings may strengthen the call for re-evaluation of the policy to delay treatment in newly diagnosed patients with PD.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) plus entacapone with levodopa/DDCI plus placebo on measures of parkinsonian disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IV study was performed in 270 PD patients randomized to receive either entacapone 200 mg or placebo with each dose of their current levodopa regimen. The primary variables were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II activities of daily living (ADL) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 summary index. UPDRS parts I, III-VI, Global Assessment of Change, PDQ-39 subscores, and the Short-Form (SF)-36 and the European Quality of Life five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were included as secondary variables. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in ADL scores with levodopa/DDCI/entacapone compared with levodopa/DDCI/placebo at 5 and 13 weeks (-2.3 vs -0.7, respectively; P = 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between treatments using the PDQ-39 summary index. UPDRS part III (motor) scores significantly decreased in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group compared with the levodopa/DDCI/placebo group (-5.0 vs -2.9, respectively; P = 0.03). Similarly, the change in the investigators Global Assessment was significantly greater (P = 0.004) in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group. There were no significant differences between treatments for any of the PDQ-39 subscores, the SF-36 variables or the EQ-5D utility score. CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa combined with entacapone demonstrated good efficacy in terms of ADL, global function, motor performance and was well tolerated. However, this short-term study did not generate significant improvements in QoL.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Catecoles/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Catecoles/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actividad Motora , Nitrilos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Three studies were performed using a fast dissolving formulation of selegiline hydrochloride designed for buccal absorption "Zydis Selegiline". The aim of the first study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Zydis Selegiline (1.25 mg or 10 mg) with conventional selegiline hydrochloride tablets "conventional selegiline tablets" (10 mg) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who were previously treated with conventional selegiline tablets as an adjunct to levodopa/dopamine agonist therapy. Patients were observed for 4 weeks to ensure that they were stable. Stable patients (n=197) were then randomised to continue with conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg (n=68), or to treatment with Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg (n=64) or Zydis Selegiline 10 mg (n=62) for 12 weeks in this randomised, parallel group study. A further aim was to establish the acceptability of Zydis Selegiline compared with conventional selegiline tablets. Patient preference for Zydis Selegiline was also evaluated in a second study, a single-dose, randomised, two-way crossover study conducted in patients with PD (n=148). Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of swallowing and salivation problems and were randomised to either Zydis Selegiline 5 mg or a placebo fast-dissolving formulation. In a third study, the degree of potentiation of the tyramine pressor effect following Zydis Selegiline was compared with that following conventional selegiline tablets in healthy volunteers. A total of 24 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg or conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg for 14-16 days in an open-label, randomised parallel group study. Both Zydis Selegiline (1.25 mg and 10 mg) treatments were shown to be therapeutically equivalent to conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg based on comparison of mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Therapeutic equivalence was defined a priori as the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in total UPDRS scores between groups to lie entirely within the range +/-5. The difference (90% CI) in mean adjusted total UPDRS between Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg and conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg was -2.50 (-4.84, -0.17), and for Zydis Selegiline 10 mg and conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg, 0.04 (-2.30, 2.38). For the motor subscores of the UPDRS, differences between adjusted means (90% CI) compared with the conventional selegiline tablets group were: Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg, -2.14 (-3.94, -0.33) and Zydis Selegiline 10 mg, -0.90 (-2.70, +0.91). Patients who switched from conventional selegiline tablets to Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg showed a slight improvement in UPDRS scores following 12 weeks of treatment (standard error of difference 1.039; p=0.01). In the single-dose crossover study, most (61%) patients liked Zydis Selegiline 5 mg; a significantly greater proportion than the null hypothesis of 50% (p<0.002). However, only 62 patients (46%) indicated that they liked the taste of Zydis Selegiline. Nevertheless, the proportion of patients who preferred Zydis Selegiline (65%) to their usual medication was significantly greater than the null hypothesis of 50% (p<0.001). Similar findings were demonstrated in the 12-week study where a higher proportion of patients who received up to 3 months of treatment indicated a preference for either Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg (90%) or Zydis Selegiline 10 mg (86%) over conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg. More than 90% of patients found Zydis Selegiline easy to take, with 61% rating it as extremely easy. Most (81%) patients taking Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg liked the taste compared with 45% taking Zydis Selegiline 5 mg (in the previous study). Zydis Selegiline did not potentiate the tyramine effect: a pressor effect was elicited after 400 mg tyramine both before and after 14 days of treatment with Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg. In contrast, after 14 days treatment with conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg, the threshold dose required to elicit the tyramine pressor response was significantly (p<0.0001) reduced from 400 mg to 200 mg. In summary, Zydis Selegiline at doses of 1.25 mg and 10 mg was therapeutically equivalent to conventional selegiline tablets 10 mg. The Zydis Selegiline formulation was well-liked by all patients, with most preferring Zydis Selegiline 1.25 mg to their usual selegiline tablet. Furthermore, Zydis Selegiline was well tolerated and, unlike conventional selegiline tablets, appeared to retain specificity for inhibition of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B), since it did not potentiate the pressor response to tyramine.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/uso terapéutico , Monoaminooxidasa/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Selegilina/farmacología , Selegilina/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacología , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/farmacología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monoaminooxidasa/metabolismo , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores de Referencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiramina/farmacocinética , Tiramina/farmacologíaRESUMEN
New data on diagnosis, drug therapy, surgery and psychosocial concerns have emerged since the publication of the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Parkinson's Disease. This article reviews new data and addresses issues left unanswered in the previous guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , Conducción de Automóvil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inhibidores de Catecol O-Metiltransferasa , Demencia/etiología , Demencia/terapia , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Globo Pálido/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Tálamo/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The specialism of geriatric medicine has developed considerably in the last half of the twentieth century. In Great Britain it has emerged from its sombre beginnings in Victorian poor law institutions to become one of the largest specialities in medicine encompassing a wide range of disciplines and interests. More recently, there has been a parallel development in "intermediate care" a sweeping phrase that encompasses a wide diversity of practices in a plethora of venues. Although there is considerable attraction in minimising the duration of hospital stay by older people, there is a real risk of intermediate care being used as a euphemism for indeterminate neglect. For older people to benefit from appropriate treatment and care, the lessons learnt by earlier generations of geriatricians, and supported by the international evidence base should not be disregarded. Elderly people need a full multi-disciplinary assessment (comprehensive geriatric assessment) and continued involvement of skilled and trained personnel in their continuing care (geriatric evaluation and management). The recommendations of the British Geriatrics Society on intermediate care are commended and should be adhered to by all planners and providers of intermediate care. There is considerable logic in developing ways in which the two developments can be integrated to build upon the best features of both.
Asunto(s)
Geriatría , Instituciones de Cuidados Intermedios , Anciano , Predicción , Evaluación Geriátrica , Enfermería Geriátrica/economía , Geriatría/historia , Geriatría/métodos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/tendencias , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Instituciones de Cuidados Intermedios/normas , Instituciones de Cuidados Intermedios/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reino Unido , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Algoritmos , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Derivación y ConsultaAsunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Apomorfina/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Apomorfina/efectos adversos , Domperidona/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
A concerted effort by health-care professionals is central to delivering effective clinical management of patients with Parkinson's disease. Before the introduction of the first PD nurse specialist, a community study showed PD patients need basic nursing care: for instance, more than half experienced difficulties with constipation, micturition, or sleep patterns. The evolving role (particularly in the United Kingdom) of PD nurse specialists has started to address these problems. Nurse specialists are ideally placed to assess personal concerns and difficulties, furnish educational and emotional support, and facilitate referral to health or social care agencies. They can help physicians or neurologists in the assessment of physical and psychological status, they can monitor the effects and side-effects of the medications used to control the disease, and they can help in managing drug titration. The provision of a telephone support line, respite care facilities, and psychological support and counseling can help with depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and confusional states, some of which may be iatrogenic. An integrated multidisciplinary PD service that incorporates nurse specialists alongside their medical colleagues can offer support at the individual level, education to the wider community and training for a variety of clinical and lay staff. The cost-effectiveness of such a system is attracting considerable international interest and is currently being evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Clínicas , Enfermedad de Parkinson/enfermería , HumanosRESUMEN
In recent years it has become apparent that nurses have several key roles in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. These include the practice of skilled clinical care, the provision of advice and education, communicating with patients and carers, and also between health and social care agencies. Their goals are to facilitate good clinical care, to reduce morbidity (both physical and psychological) and to achieve better informed patients by the reduction of misinformation, fear and distress caused by the diagnosis and consequences of this disease. The overall goal is to improve the prognosis and to reduce the impact of this disease on patients and their care givers. To achieve these goals the specialist nurse needs skills in assessment, reassessment and counselling in addition to knowledge of the disease and its management. The training needs have been established for the nursing profession to address these issues, and courses have been established and approved. A scale comprising four clinical management stages has been proposed: initially around the time of diagnosis; stable maintenance therapy; a more complex management stage, and palliative care. Nursing interventions and priorities differ in these arbitrary stages. Several models of nursing provision have been piloted in the United Kingdom, and results of evaluations are keenly awaited. Meanwhile, specialist nurses are proving to be popular with patients and carers, medical specialists, and the Parkinson's Disease Society which aims to see their provision in each Health District throughout the United Kingdom. In summary, the nursing role is complementary to those of the other members of the multi-disciplinary health team that aims to improve the quality of life of PD patients and their carers.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Atención de Enfermería/normas , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Educación en Enfermería , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Competencia ProfesionalRESUMEN
There is no abrupt change in physiology, pathology or pharmacology occurring at or around the age of 65 years. There is some evidence of a change in the effect of illness, and of the prevalence of disability with advancing age. However, these changes are individual and gradual, and more associated with passing 75-80 years rather than 65. The main change occurring in the seventh decade arises from retirement from paid employment, and is therefore financial. Hence, in contrast to personal financial support, Health and Social Services departments would be ill advised to use the age of 65 as a threshold. Age-related admission policies may perpetuate ageism, and needs-related policies may therefore be preferable. The challenge facing departments of geriatric medicine and psychiatry is to present their services attractively to patients, carers and purchasers, who need to recognize the rationale for the purchase of these forms of care, with reference not only to benefit to patients, but also to their informal carers.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Personas con Discapacidad , Femenino , Prioridades en Salud , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Estatal/economía , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
One hundred and seventy-three parkinsonian patients treated with levodopa entered a randomized multicentre comparison between two introductory schedules for adjuvant bromocriptine. A 2-week placebo run-in was followed by a double-blind 8-week titration phase of bromocriptine up to 15 mg daily, according to the standard seven-step, or a simpler three-step, regimen. They were maintained on this dose for a further 8 weeks and then followed for a further 12 weeks. One hundred and fifty-nine patients completed the placebo run-in period, and 132 completed 16 weeks. No significant differences were found between the standard and simplified regimens for efficacy, side-effects, withdrawals or deaths, nor for any of the clinical or functional assessments. The Webster score improved by 29% and the Cape ADL by 32%. The simpler schedule offers advantages to those elderly parkinsonian patients in whom bromocriptine is added to optimal levodopa dosage.
Asunto(s)
Bromocriptina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bromocriptina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
In this multicentre study a controlled-release formulation of levodopa and the decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide (Madopar CR) was evaluated in patients with Parkinson's disease exhibiting dose-related fluctuations in motor performance in response to conventional levodopa preparations. The effect of Madopar CR, with or without conventional levodopa/benserazide, on the proportion of time spent "on", "off" or "intermediate" was compared with that of previous conventional levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor therapy. Evaluation of the two periods of optimum therapy was based on both patient diary data and investigator opinion. Forty seven patients completed the study but full patient diaries were available for only 37. The mean optimum total daily dosage of conventional Madopar was 820 mg taken in a mean of 6.4 doses, compared with a mean optimum daily dosage of combined Madopar CR and conventional Madopar of 1088 mg, taken in a mean of 5.2 doses. Conventional Madopar was taken in addition to Madopar CR in all but eight patients. Madopar CR was felt to be advantageous in 83% and disadvantageous in 11% of patients completing the study. Considering the 37 patients for whom diary data were available, Madopar CR therapy resulted in an increase in the mean time spent "on" (p = 0.016) and a decrease in the mean time spent "off" (p = 0.029) compared with conventional Madopar alone. Individually 25 out of 37 had an increase in "on" time and 19 out of 37 experienced a decrease in "off" time. Thus Madopar CR was found to be beneficial in a significant proportion of patients experiencing fluctuations in response to conventional levodopa.
Asunto(s)
Benserazida/administración & dosificación , Carboxiliasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hidrazinas/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benserazida/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Destreza Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Examen NeurológicoRESUMEN
A prospective longitudinal study of thyroid function was conducted in 180 consecutive admissions to an acute geriatric unit. The rest strategy included assay of TSH and TRH testing when appropriate. On admission TSH was suppressed (less than 0.1 mU/l) in 17 patients (9.4%) and elevated (greater than 4.0 mU/l) in 8 (4.4%). Follow-up of these initial abnormalities showed resolution in almost all cases. Our findings suggest that acute illness may interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, causing either temporary suppression or stimulation of TSH release. Although no new cases of thyroid disease were diagnosed, the prevalence of established dysfunction was 3.3% (2.7% hypothyroid; 0.6% hyperthyroid). To avoid misleading results, testing of thyroid dysfunction should be delayed until recovery from illness.