RESUMEN
Two scab diseases are recognized currently on citrus: citrus scab, caused by Elsinoë fawcettii, and sweet orange scab, caused by E. australis. Because the two species cannot be reliably distinguished by morphological or cultural characteristics, host range and molecular methods must be used to identify isolates. Four pathotypes of E. fawcettii and two of E. australis have been described to date based on host range. The host specificity and genetic relationships among 76 isolates from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Korea, New Zealand, and the United States were investigated. Based on pathogenicity tests on eight differential hosts, 61 isolates were identified as E. fawcettii and 15 as E. australis. Of 61 isolates of E. fawcettii, 24 isolates were identified as the Florida broad host range (FBHR) pathotype, 7 as the Florida narrow host range (FNHR) pathotype, 10 as the Tryon's pathotype, and 3 as the "Lemon" pathotype. Two new pathotypes, the "Jingeul" and the satsuma, rough lemon, grape-fruit, clementine (SRGC), are described, and four isolates did not fit into any of the known pathotypes of E. fawcettii. Of the 15 isolates of E. australis from Argentina and Brazil, 9 belonged to the sweet orange pathotype and 6 from Korea to the natsudaidai pathotype. E. fawcettii and E. australis were clearly distinguishable among groups by random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) assays and the E. fawcettii group was divided into three subgroups, A-1, A-2, and A-3. The A-1 group was composed of the FBHR, FNHR, and SRGC pathotypes; some Lemon pathotypes; and the uncertain isolates. The A-2 subgroup included all of the Tryon's pathotype isolates and one of the three Lemon pathotype isolates and the A-3 group contained the Jingeul pathotype isolates. E. australis was differentiated into two groups: B-1, the natsudaidai pathotype isolates, and B-2, the sweet orange pathotype isolates. Isolates of E. fawcettii and E. australis were clearly distinguishable by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (TEF) gene. There were also fixed nucleotide differences in the ITS and TEF genes that distinguished subgroups separated by RAPD-PCR within species. We confirmed two species of Elsinoë, two pathotypes of E. australis, and at least six pathotypes of E. fawcettii and described their distribution in the countries included in this study.
Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos/patogenicidad , Citrus/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Plantas/microbiología , Argentina , Ascomicetos/clasificación , Ascomicetos/genética , Australia , Secuencia de Bases , Brasil , ADN de Hongos/genética , ADN de Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Corea (Geográfico) , Nueva Zelanda , Técnica del ADN Polimorfo Amplificado Aleatorio , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Isolates of Colletotrichum acutatum were collected from anthracnose-affected strawberry, leatherleaf fern, and Key lime; ripe-rot-affected blueberry; and postbloom fruit drop (PFD)-affected sweet orange in Florida. Additional isolates from ripe-rot-affected blueberry were collected from Georgia and North Carolina and from anthracnose-affected leatherleaf fern in Costa Rica. Pathogenicity tests on blueberry and strawberry fruit; foliage of Key lime, leatherleaf fern, and strawberry; and citrus flowers showed that isolates were highly pathogenic to their host of origin. Isolates were not pathogenic on foliage of heterologous hosts; however, several nonhomologous isolates were mildly or moderately pathogenic to citrus flowers and blueberry isolates were pathogenic to strawberry fruit. Based on sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1-5.8S rRNA-ITS2 region of the rDNA repeat, the glutaraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase intron 2 (G3PD), and the glutamine synthase intron 2 (GS), isolates from the same host were identical or very similar to each other and distinct from those isolated from other hosts. Isolates from leatherleaf fern in Florida were the only exception. Among these isolates, there were two distinct G3PD and GS sequences that occurred in three of four possible combinations. Only one of these combinations occurred in Costa Rica. Although maximum parsimony trees constructed from genomic regions individually displayed little or no homoplasy, there was a lack of concordance among genealogies that was consistent with a history of recombination. This lack of concordance was particularly evident within a clade containing PFD, Key lime, and leatherleaf fern isolates. Overall, the data indicated that it is unlikely that a pathogenic strain from one of the hosts examined would move to another of these hosts and produce an epidemic.
Asunto(s)
Colletotrichum/genética , Colletotrichum/aislamiento & purificación , Productos Agrícolas/microbiología , Helechos/microbiología , Frutas/microbiología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Colletotrichum/enzimología , Colletotrichum/patogenicidad , Costa Rica , Florida , Fragaria/microbiología , Genes Fúngicos , Glutamato-Amoníaco Ligasa/genética , Gliceraldehído-3-Fosfato Deshidrogenasas/genética , Intrones/genética , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Filogenia , Enfermedades de las Plantas/microbiología , Recombinación Genética/genética , Mapeo Restrictivo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Citrus black spot (CBS) is caused by Guignardia citricarpa, which incites lesions on citrus fruit and can induce fruit drop. Quiescent infections occur during the spring and summer, and symptoms appear at fruit maturity or after harvest. Thus, fruit from citrus areas affected by CBS represent a risk for introduction of this pathogen into new areas. The effects of preventive field fungicide programs, postharvest fungicide drenches, packinghouse fungicide applications, and storage temperatures on postharvest symptom development and viability of G. citricarpa in lesions were evaluated in five experiments on Murcott tangor, Valencia oranges, and lemons. Preventive field treatments and fruit storage at 8°C consistently reduced postharvest CBS development, whereas a postharvest fungicide drench or packinghouse treatment with fungicides had no effect on postharvest symptom development. In a separate experiment, postharvest appearance of symptoms was related to the percentage of fruit with symptoms at harvest. The preventive field fungicide program also consistently reduced the percentage of isolation of G. citricarpa from affected fruit, whereas storage temperature and packinghouse fungicide treatment gave variable results. The viability of the fungus declined with storage time of fruit after harvest, but G. citricarpa could still be readily isolated regardless of treatment. In another experiment, the viability of the fungus in detached fruit or peel was minimally affected by temperature or moisture during storage. The frequency of successful isolation declined with time, but G. citricarpa was still recovered frequently from symptomatic tissue at later times. The most effective means to reduce postharvest development of symptoms is through preventive application of fungicides during the fruit growing season and storage of harvested fruit at cold temperatures. None of the measures evaluated substantially reduced viability of G. citricarpa, and the pathogen would likely be introduced on symptomatic fruit from citrus areas with CBS.