Survival of Melancholia: a Retrospective Study of Patients with Depressive Disorders.

BACKGROUND: The DSM-IV and the DSM-5 eliminated the importance of the syndromal identity of melancholic depression in favour of a dimensional model within the domain of major depressive disorders. Melancholic depression was excluded from DSM as a distinct disorder owing to the impact of ageing, genetics, and course of illness. We challenge these assertions using retrospective data collected from patients with depression. METHOD: Electronic medical records of 1073 patients with depressive-spectrum disorders in 12 centres across Germany spanning from January 2010 to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of melancholia was made using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 21 items (HAMD-21). Patients were followed up every 2 weeks and yearly until discharge from inpatient units. The final dataset consisted of 1014 patients; each had received a minimum of two complete observations. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with melancholic depression had higher HAMD-21 score than did patients with non-melancholic depression (32.6 vs 23.13, p < 0.001). At the final visit, patients with melancholic depression responded to treatment more often than did patients with non-melancholic depression (81.3% vs 69.04%, p = 0.0156), whereas the two groups were comparable in terms of remission status (50.55 vs 48.68%, p = 0.1943). The relapse rate was higher in patients with melancholic depression than in patients with non-melancholic depression after 1 year (60% vs 45.01%, p = 0.0599), 2 years (77.78% vs 60.36%, p = 0.0233), and 4 years (80% vs 64.45%, p = 0.0452). CONCLUSION: Melancholic depression has an identifiable constellation of symptoms and it is not just a severe form of major depression. Melancholic depression is not the result of age-related or pathoplastic changes. We advocate including melancholia as its own illness entity in the next edition of the DSM.

C-reactive protein as a predictor of anastomotic leak in the first week after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

AIM: Anastomotic leak (AL) after anterior resection results in increased morbidity, mortality and local recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict AL in the first week after anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHOD: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database that included all patients undergoing anterior resection between January 2008 and December 2013 was performed. The ability of CRP to predict AL was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUC) curves. The severity of AL was defined using the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) grading system. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eleven patients were included in the study. Statistically significant differences in mean CRP values were found between those with and without an AL on postoperative days 5, 6 and 7. A CRP value of 132 mg/l on postoperative day 5 had an AUC of 0.75, corresponding to a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 76.6%, a positive predictive value of 16.3% and a negative predictive value of 97.5%. Multivariable analysis found that a CRP of > 132 mg/l on postoperative day 5 was the only statistically significant patient factor that was linked to an increased risk of AL (HR = 8.023, 95% CI: 1.936-33.238, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Early detection of AL may minimize postoperative complications. CRP is a useful negative predictive test for the development of AL following anterior resection.

Endoscopic tattooing to aid tumour localisation in colon cancer: the need for standardisation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: An increasing number of colon and rectal tumours are being resected using laparoscopic techniques. Identifying these tumours intraoperatively can be difficult. The use of tattooing can facilitate an easier resection; however, the lack of standardised guidelines can potentially lead to errors intraoperatively and potentially result in worse outcomes for patients. The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable method of preoperative tumour localisation from the available literature to date. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken to identify any articles related to endoscopic tattooing and tumour localisation during colorectal surgery. RESULTS: To date there is still mixed evidence regarding tattooing techniques and the choice of ink that should be used. There are numerous studies demonstrating safe tattooing techniques and highlighting the risks and benefits of different types of ink available. CONCLUSION: Based on the available studies we have recommended a standardised approach to endoscopic tattooing of colorectal tumours prior to laparoscopic resection.