Inhibition of acetylcholine-induced activation of extracellular regulated protein kinase prevents the encoding of an inhibitory avoidance response in the rat.

It has been demonstrated that the forebrain cholinergic system and the extracellular regulated kinase signal transduction pathway are involved in the mechanisms of learning, encoding, and storage of information. We investigated the involvement of the cholinergic and glutamatergic systems projecting to the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus and of the extracellular regulated kinase signal transduction pathway in the acquisition and recall of the step-down inhibitory avoidance response in the rat, a relatively simple behavioral test acquired in a one-trial session. To this aim we studied by microdialysis the release of acetylcholine and glutamate, and by immunohistochemistry the activation of extracellular regulated kinase during acquisition, encoding and recall of the behavior. Cholinergic, but not glutamatergic, neurons projecting to the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus were activated during acquisition of the task, as shown by increase in cortical and hippocampal acetylcholine release. Released acetylcholine in turn activated extracellular regulated kinase in neurons located in the target structures, since the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine blocked extracellular regulated kinase activation. Both increased acetylcholine release and extracellular regulated kinase activation were necessary for memory formation, as administration of scopolamine and of extracellular regulated kinase inhibitors was followed by blockade of extracellular regulated kinase activation and amnesia. Our data indicate that a critical function of the learning-associated increase in acetylcholine release is to promote the activation of the extracellular regulated kinase signal transduction pathway and help understanding the role of these systems in the encoding of an inhibitory avoidance memory.

Antiamnesic effect of metoprine and of selective histamine H(1) receptor agonists in a modified mouse passive avoidance test.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the effect caused by the inhibition of histamine catabolism by means of metoprine and the activation of histamine H(1) receptors by selective agonists on learning and memory processes, using a modified method of the mouse passive avoidance test. The administration of scopolamine 1 mg/kg (i. p.) immediately after the training session caused statistically-significant amnesia during the retention trial performed 24 h later. Piracetam (30 mg/kg (i.p.)), used as a positive control, and administered 20 min before the training session, prevented scopolamine-induced memory impairment. The histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitor, metoprine, (2 and 5 mg/kg (s.c.)) had effects similar to those of this nootropic drug. The highly-selective H(1) receptor agonist, 2-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)histamine (FMPH) (2.65 and 6.5 microg/mouse (i.c.v.)) and the less selective agonist, 2-thiazolylethylamine (2-TEA) (0.1 and 0.3 microg/mouse (i.c.v.)) both antagonized the scopolamine-induced amnesia significantly and in a dose-related manner. The selective H(1) receptor antagonist, pyrilamine (20 mg/kg (i.p.)), revealed no effect by itself, but significantly prevented the antiamnesic action both that of the H(1) receptor agonists, and that of endogenous histamine, released by metoprine, thus suggesting a cognitive improvement via the activation of H(1) receptors.

Tiagabine antinociception in rodents depends on GABA(B) receptor activation: parallel antinociception testing and medial thalamus GABA microdialysis.

The effects of a new antiepileptic drug, tiagabine, (R)-N-[4,4-di-(3-methylthien-2-yl)but-3-enyl] nipecotic acid hydrochloride, were studied in mice and rats in antinociceptive tests, using three kinds of noxious stimuli: mechanical (paw pressure), chemical (abdominal constriction) and thermal (hot plate). In vivo microdialysis was performed in parallel in awake, freely moving rats in order to evaluate possible alterations in extracellular gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in a pain-modulating region, the medial thalamus. Systemic administration of tiagabine, 30 mg kg(-1) i.p., increased nearly twofold the extracellular GABA levels in rats and increased significantly the rat paw pressure nociceptive threshold in a time-correlated manner. Dose-related significant tiagabine-induced antinociception was also observed at the doses of 1 and 3 mg kg(-1) i.p. in the mouse hot plate and abdominal constriction tests. The tiagabine antinociception was completely antagonised by pretreatment with the selective GABA(B) receptor antagonist, CGP 35348, (3-aminopropyl-diethoxy-methyl-phosphinic acid) (2.5 microg/mouse or 25 microg/rat i.c.v.), but not by naloxone (1 mg kg(-1) s.c.), both administered 15 min before tiagabine. Thus, it is suggested that tiagabine causes antinociception due to raised endogenous GABA levels which in turn activate GABA(B) receptors.

Evidence for hypernociception induction following histamine H1 receptor activation in rodents.

To characterize the mechanism of the analgesic action of H1 antihistaminics the effects of a new, highly selective agonist, 2-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)histamine dihydrogenmaleate (FMPH), and of the better known H1 agonist, 2-thiazolylethylamine (2-TEA), were studied on pain threshold by means of three different kinds of tests for nociception (mouse hot plate and abdominal constriction, and rat paw pressure tests). Low doses of both substances (2.65 and 6.5 microg/animal i.c.v. for FMPH in the hot plate and paw pressure tests, and 0.3 microg/rat i.c.v. for 2-TEA in the paw pressure test) were slightly but significantly hypernociceptive. The selective H1 receptor antagonist, pyrilamine maleate (10-30 mg/kg s.c.), induced a dose-dependent antinociception in all three tests, and both FMPH and 2-TEA prevented its effect, but not that of morphine, thus indicating action on H1 receptors. The same low doses of FMPH were also able to enhance animals' spontaneous motility and curiosity. High doses of FMPH (13.23-132.3 microg/mouse i.c.v.) raised the pain threshold, but due to the severe motor impairment evidenced by the rota rod test, this cannot be considered as real antinociception. An increase in the pain threshold lacking any motor impairment was observed for tenfold higher doses of 2-TEA (3 and 10 microg/mouse i.c.v.). This may be due to action on H2 receptors, with the reported relative potency of 2-TEA for H1 and H2 receptors being about 12:1. It is therefore suggested that H1 receptor activation increases sensitivity to noxious stimuli.

Antidepressant-like effects of endogenous histamine and of two histamine H1 receptor agonists in the mouse forced swim test.

1. Effects of substances which are able to alter brain histamine levels and two histamine H1 receptor agonists were investigated in mice by means of an animal model of depression, the forced swim test. 2. Imipramine (10 and 30 mg kg(-1), i.p.) and amitriptyline (5 and 15 mg kg(-1), i.p.) were used as positive controls. Their effects were not affected by pretreatment with the histamine H3 receptor agonist, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine, at a dose (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) which did not modify the cumulative time of immobility. 3. The histamine H3 receptor antagonist, thioperamide (2-20 mg kg(-1), s.c.), showed an antidepressant-like effect, with a maximum at the dose of 5 mg kg(-1), which was completely prevented by (R)-alpha-methylhistamine. 4. The histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitor, metoprine (2-20 mg kg(-1), s.c.), was effective with an ED50 of 4.02 (2.71-5.96) mg kg(-1); its effect was prevented by (R)-alpha-methylhistamine. 5. The histamine precursor, L-histidine (100-1000 mg kg(-1), i.p.), dose-dependently decreased the time of immobility [ED30 587 (499-712) mg kg(-1)]. The effect of 500 mg kg(-1) L-histidine was completely prevented by the selective histidine decarboxylase inhibitor, (S)-alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (50 mg kg(-1), i.p.), administered 15 h before. 6. The highly selective histamine H1 receptor agonist, 2-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)histamine (0.3-6.5 microg per mouse, i.c.v.), and the better known H1 agonist, 2-thiazolylethylamine (0.1-1 microg per mouse, i.c.v.), were both dose-dependently effective in decreasing the time of immobility [ED50 3.6 (1.53-8.48) and 1.34 (0.084-21.5) microg per mouse, respectively]. 7. None of the substances tested affected mouse performance in the rota rod test at the doses used in the forced swim test. 8. It was concluded that endogenous histamine reduces the time of immobility in this test, suggesting an antidepressant-like effect, via activation of H1 receptors.

Antinociceptive profile of 3-alpha-tropanyl 2-(4-Cl-phenoxy)butyrate (SM-21) [corrected]: a novel analgesic with a presynaptic cholinergic mechanism of action.

The antinociceptive effect of (+/-)-3-alpha-tropanyl 2-(4-Cl-phenoxy)butyrate [corrected] (SM-21) (10-40 mg kg(-1) s.c., 10-30 mg kg(-1) i.p., 20-60 mg kg(-1) p.o., 3-20 mg kg(-1) i.v. and 5-20 microg per mouse i.c.v.) was examined in rodents and guinea pigs by using the hot-plate, abdominal constriction, tail-flick and paw-pressure tests. The antinociception produced by (+/-)-SM-21 was prevented by atropine, pirenzepine and hemicholinium-3 but not by quinpirole, R-(alpha)-methylhistamine, [1-[2(methylsufonyl)amino]ethyl]-4-piperidinyl]methyl-5-floro++ +-2-methoxy-1H-indole-3-carboxylate hydrochloride, N6-cyclopentyladenosine, 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine hydrobromide, naloxone, 3-aminopropyl-diethoxy-methyl-phosphinic acid or reserpine. On the basis of the above data, it can be postulated that (+/-)-SM-21 exerted an antinociceptive effect mediated by a central potentiation of cholinergic transmission. Affinity profiles of (+/-)-SM-21 for muscarinic receptor subtypes, determined by functional studies (rabbit vas deferens for M1, guinea pig atrium for M2, guinea pig ileum for M3 and immature guinea pig uterus for putative M4) have shown a selectivity ratio M2/M1 of 4.6 that, although very low, might be responsible for the antinociception induced by (+/-)-SM-21 through an increase in ACh extracellular levels. In the antinociceptive dose range, (+/-)-SM-21 did not impair mouse performance evaluated by the rota-rod and hole-board tests.

Stereoselective increase in cholinergic transmission by R-(+)-hyoscyamine.

R-(+)-hyoscyamine, the dextro enantiomer of atropine, has been shown to amplify cholinergic transmission. R-(+)-hyoscyamine, unlike S-(-)-hyoscyamine, was able to increase acetylcholine release both in vitro and in vivo at a range of concentrations (10(-14) to 10(-12) M) and doses (5 microg/kg i.p.) which were inadequate for blocking muscarinic receptors. The increase over control values in ACh release was 15.9 +/- 2.1% in in vitro experiments performed in rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparations (n = 6), and 63.3 + 16.3% in cortical microdialysis performed in free-moving rats (n = 5). The maximum ACh release was reached 60 min after R-(+)-hyoscyamine administration in in vivo experiments. At the same doses and concentrations, R-(+)-hyoscyamine was also able to elicit: antinociception of a cholinergic type (55.6-112.7% depending on the test used); complete prevention of scopolamine- and dicyclomine-induced amnesia; potentiation of muscular contractions electrically evoked in isolated guinea-pig ileum (16.7 +/- 3.6%) and in rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm (19.9 +/- 3.2%) preparations. Antinociception was performed using the hot-plate and acetic acid abdominal constriction tests in mice, and the paw pressure test in rats, while prevention of induced amnesia was evaluated in mice using the passive-avoidance test. The respective affinities (pA2) for R-(+)- and S-(-)-hyoscyamine vs M1 (rabbit vas deferens), M2 (rat atrium) and M3 (rat ileum) receptor subtypes were as follows: 7.05 +/- 0.05/9.33 +/- 0.03 for M1; 7.25 +/- 0.04/8.95 +/- 0.01 for M2; 6.88 +/- 0.05/9.04 +/- 0.03 for M3. The respective pKi values for R-(+)- and S-(-)-hyoscyamine vs the five human muscarinic receptor subtypes expressed in Chinese hamster oocytes (CHO-K1) were as follows: 8.21 +/- 0.07/9.48 +/- 0.18 for m1; 7.89 +/- 0.06/9.45 +/- 0.31 for m2; 8.06 +/- 0.18/9.30 +/- 0.19 for m3; 8.35 +/- 0.11/9.55 +/- 0.13 for m4; 8.17 +/- 0.08/9.24 +/- 0.30 for m5.

Effects of two histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitors, SKF 91488 and BW 301 U, in rodent antinociception.

We have previously reported that the histaminergic system is involved in the control of pain perception, and that substances able to enhance histamine brain levels, such as the histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitor, metoprine, induce antinociception. In the present study, in order to corroborate the idea of inducing antinociception by inhibiting histamine catabolism, the effects of a noncompetitive histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitor. SKF 91488, were studied in rodents by means of tests inducing three different kinds of noxious stimuli: thermal (mouse hot plate), chemical (mouse abdominal constrictions) and mechanical (rat paw pressure). The ability to react to noxious stimuli was assessed by the rota-rod test. In addition, a competitive inhibitor of the histamine catabolism enzyme, BW 301 U, was studied in the hot plate test. SKF 91488 (30, 50 and 100 micrograms per animal i.c.v.) raised dose-dependently the pain threshold in all three tests. To verify whether SKF 91488-induced antinociception is due to inhibition of histamine-N-methyltransferase, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine, described to block histamine release and synthesis by stimulating the histamine H3-autoreceptor and activating the negative feed-back mechanism, was used. When administered at doses which do not alter the pain threshold per se, 0.5 microgram per rat i.c.v. or 10 mg kg-1 i.p. in mice, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine was able to antagonize significantly the antinociceptive effect induced by 30 micrograms per animal i.c.v. of SKF 91488. BW 301 U (30 and 100 mg kg-1 i.p.) showed a dose-dependent, long-lasting antinociception, which was also antagonized by pretreatment with (R)-alpha-methylhistamine. The present data show that the antinociceptive effect previously described for metoprine is not restricted to this molecule, but is also shared by other histamine-N-methyl-transferase inhibitors. This generalization provides further evidence to the importance of the histaminergic system in pain control mechanisms.

Investigation into the role of histamine receptors in rodent antinociception.

The aim of the present study is to the elucidate the confusion that exists in the literature concerning which receptor subtype is involved in mediating histamine antinociception. To this purpose impromidine 3HCl and burimamide were used. Because both substances have been described to block histamine H3-receptor, and, at higher doses, also to act on the postsynaptic site as agonist and antagonist, respectively, they were administered in a wide range of ICV doses, to distinguish the effects due to action on different receptors. Experiments were performed in mice and rats by means of tests inducing three different kinds of noxious stimuli: mechanical (paw pressure), chemical (abdominal constriction), and thermal (hot plate). Both substances showed, at the lowest doses tested, antinociception, which was antagonized by the selective H3-receptor agonist, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine 2HCl (RAMH) (10 mg/kg SC in mice or 0.5 microgram per rat ICV). At higher doses impromidine was antinociceptive while burimamide was hypernociceptive, in accordance with their opposite action on the H2-receptor. It is suggested that the histaminergic system modulates nociception via activation of the H2-receptor.

Central cholinergic antinociception induced by 5HT4 agonists: BIMU 1 and BIMU 8.

The antinociceptive effect of two 5-HT4 agonists, BIMU 1 and BIMU 8, were examined in mice and rats by using the hot-plate, abdominal constriction and paw-pressure tests. In both species, BIMU 1 (10-20 mg kg-1 s.c. and 40-60 mg kg-1 p.o. in mice; 20 mg kg-1 i.p. in rats) and BIMU 8 (20-30 mg kg-1 s.c. and 60 mg kg-1 p.o. in mice; 20 mg kg-1 i.p. in rats), produced significant antinociception which was prevented by atropine (5 mg kg-1 i.p.), hemicholinium-3 (1 microgram per mouse i.c.v.), SDZ 205-557 (10 mg kg-1 i.p.), GR 125487 (20 mg kg-1 i.p.) but not by naloxone (1 mg kg-1 i.p.), CGP 35348 (100 mg kg-1 i.p.) and reserpine (2 mg kg-1 i.p.). Moreover, BIMU 1 and BIMU 8 increase of pain threshold, is abolished by nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) lesions in rats. SDZ 205-557 and GR 125487 which totally antagonized BIMU 1 and BIMU 8 antinociception did not modify morphine (7 mg kg-1 s.c.) or baclofen (4 mg kg-1 s.c.) antinociception. Intracerebroventricular injection in mice of BIMU 1 (3 micrograms per mouse) and BIMU 8 (10 micrograms per mouse), doses which were largely ineffective by parenteral routes, induces an antinociception whose intensity equaled that obtainable s.c., i.p. or p.o. In the antinociceptive dose-range, neither 5HT4 agonist impaired mice motor coordination evaluated by rota-rod test. On the basis of the above data, it can be postulated that BIMU 1 and BIMU 8 exerted an antinociceptive effect mediated by a central amplification of cholinergic transmission.

Role of histamine in rodent antinociception.

1. Effects of substances which are able to alter brain histamine levels on the nociceptive threshold were investigated in mice and rats by means of tests inducing three different kinds of noxious stimuli: mechanical (paw pressure), chemical (abdominal constriction) and thermal (hot plate). 2. A wide range of i.c.v. doses of histamine 2HCl was studied. Relatively high dose were dose-dependently antinociceptive in all three tests: 5-100 micrograms per rat in the paw pressure test, 5-50 micrograms per mouse in the abdominal constriction test and 50-100 micrograms per mouse in the hot plate test. Conversely, very low doses were hyperalgesic: 0.5 microgram per rat in the paw pressure test and 0.1-1 microgram per mouse in the hot plate test. In the abdominal constriction test no hyperalgesic effect was observed. 3. The histamine H3 antagonist, thioperamide maleate, elicited a weak but statistically significant dose-dependent antinociceptive effect by both parenteral (10-40 mg kg-1) and i.c.v. (1.1-10 micrograms per rat and 3.4-10 micrograms per mouse) routes. 4. The histamine H3 agonist, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine dihydrogenomaleate was hyperalgesic, with a rapid effect (15 min after treatment) following i.c.v. administration of 1 microgram per rat and 3 microgram per mouse, or i.p. administration of 100 mg kg-1 in mice. In rats 20 mg kg-1, i.p. elicited hyperalgesia only 4 h after treatment. 5. Thioperamide-induced antinociception was completely prevented by pretreatment with a non-hyperalgesic i.p. dose of (R)-alpha-methylhistamine in the mouse hot plate and abdominal constriction tests. Antagonism was also observed when both substances were administered i.c.v. in rats. 6. L-Histidine HCl dose-dependently induced a slowly occurring antinociception in all three tests. The doses of 250 and 500 mg kg-1, i.p. were effective in the rat paw pressure test, and those of 500 and 1500 mg kg-1, i.p. in the mouse hot plate test. In the mouse abdominal constriction test 500 and 1000 mg kg-1, i.p. showed their maximum effect 2 h after treatment. 7. The histamine N-methyltransferase inhibitor, metoprine, elicited a long-lasting, dose-dependent antinociception in all three tests by both i.p. (10-30 mg kg-1) and i.c.v. (50-100 micrograms per rat) routes. 8. To ascertain the mechanism of action of the antinociceptive effect of L-histidine and metoprine, the two substances were also studied in combination with the histamine synthesis inhibitor (S)-alpha-fluoromethylhistidine and with (R)-alpha-methylhistamine, respectively. L-Histidine antinociception was completely antagonized in all three tests by pretreatment with (S)-alpha-fluoromethylhistidine HCl (50 mg kg-1, i.p.)administered 2 h before L-histidine treatment. Similarly, metoprine antinociception was prevented by(R)-alpha-methylhistamine dihydrogenomaleate 20 mg kg-1, i.p. administered 15 min before metoprine. Both(S)-alpha-fluoromethylhistidine and (R)-alpha-methylhistamine were used at doses which did not modify the nociceptive threshold when given alone.9. The catabolism product, 1-methylhistamine, administered i.c.v. had no effect in either rat paw pressure or mouse abdominal constriction tests.10. These results indicate that the antinociceptive action of histamine may take place on the postsynaptic site, and that its hyperalgesic effect occurs with low doses acting on the presynaptic receptor. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the H3 antagonist, thioperamide is antinociceptive and the H3 agonist, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine is hyperalgesic, probably modulating endogenous histamine release.L-Histidine and metoprine, which are both able to increase brain histamine levels, are also able to induce antinociception in mice and rats. Involvement of the histaminergic system in the modulation of nociceptive stimuli is thus proposed.

Desensitization of GABAB receptors and antagonism by CGP 35348, prevent bicuculline- and picrotoxin-induced antinociception.

The effect of the GABAA antagonists, bicuculline and picrotoxin, in the hot plate and writhing tests in mice and the paw-pressure test in rats was assessed. Subconvulsant doses of bicuculline (1.3-4 mumol kg-1, s.c.) or picrotoxin (0.8-2.5 mumol kg-1, s.c.) induced a dose-related increase in latency of licking in the hot plate test in mice, whereas subconvulsant doses of strychnine and thiosemicarbazide (0.9 and 6 mg kg-1, s.c. respectively), did not modify the threshold to thermal stimuli in mice. The effects of bicuculline and picrotoxin were not modified by naloxone (3 mg kg-1, i.p., a dose which inhibited the antinociceptive effect of morphine) or by atropine (5 mg kg-1, i.p., a dose which prevented oxotremorine-induced antinociception) but were antagonized by the GABAB antagonist CGP 35348 (2.5 micrograms, i.c.v., a dose which prevented (+/-)baclofen-induced antinociception). Mice, rendered tolerant to baclofen-induced antinociception by twice daily injection of increasing doses of baclofen (5-18 mg kg-1, s.c.), were unresponsive to the antinociceptive effects of bicuculline and picrotoxin but still responded to morphine. Bicuculline and picrotoxin, in the same range of doses which affected the three models of antinociception used, inhibited pentobarbital-induced hypnosis. Large doses of bicuculline and picrotoxin (4 and 2.5 mumol kg-1, s.c. respectively), reduced locomotor activity and impaired rota-rod performance in mice. The changes in response to noxious stimuli, induced by bicuculline and picrotoxin, are interpreted as an antinociceptive effect. It is then suggested that this effect might depend on an indirect activation of GABAB receptors through release of GABA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Role of muscarinic receptor subtypes in central antinociception.

1. The ability to modify the pain threshold by the two M1-muscarinic agonists: McN-A-343 and AF-102B and by the specific M2-agonist arecaidine was examined in mice and rats by using three different noxious stimuli: chemical (writhing test), thermic (hot-plate test) and mechanical (paw pressure test). 2. In the mouse hot-plate test McN-A-343 (20-50 micrograms per mouse i.c.v.) and AF-102B (1-10 mg kg-1 i.p.) produced significant antinociception which was prevented by atropine (1 microgram per mouse i.c.v.) and by the two selective M1 antagonists: pirenzepine (0.01 micrograms per mouse i.c.v.) and dicyclomine (0.08 micrograms per mouse i.c.v. or 10 mg kg-1 i.p.) but not by the specific M2-antagonist AFDX-116 (0.1 micrograms per mouse i.c.v.), naloxone (1 mg kg-1 i.p.) or by the acetylcholine (ACh) depletor hemicholinium-3 (HC-3) (1 micrograms per mouse i.c.v.). McN-A-343 and AF-102B were able to increase the pain threshold also in the mouse acetic acid writhing test and in rat paw pressure test. These antinociceptive effects were completely prevented by dicyclomine (0.08 micrograms per mouse i.c.v. or 10 mg kg-1 i.p.) but not by AFDX-116 (0.1 microgram per mouse or rat i.c.v.). 3. In contrast with the M1-agonists, the M2-agonist arecaidine (0.1-2 micrograms per mouse or rat i.c.v.) did not induce antinociception in all three analgesic tests. However, arecaidine, at the same i.c.v. doses, was able to reduce the pain threshold in the hot-plate and paw pressure tests.4. The site of muscarinic control of the pain threshold is localized in the CNS since drugs which do not cross the blood-brain barrier such as McN-A-343, pirenzepine and arecaidine exerted their effects only if injected i.c.v.5. On the basis of the above findings and existing literature we suggest that the postsynaptic muscarinic receptors involved in antinociception belong to the M1 subtype. Nevertheless, presynaptic autoreceptors (M2 subtype) may play a role in pain regulation since they are involved in modulation of endogenous ACh release.

CGP 35348, a new GABAB antagonist, prevents antinociception and muscle-relaxant effect induced by baclofen.

1. CGP 35348, a new GABAB antagonist, was examined on antinociception induced by (+/-)-baclofen by use of the hot plate and writhing tests in mice and the paw pressure test in rats. CGP 35348 was also studied in mice on (+/-)-baclofen-induced impairment of rota-rod performance. 2. CGP 35348, injected either i.p. (60-100 mg kg-1 in mouse) or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) (0.5-2.5 micrograms per mouse; 25 micrograms per rat) prevented (+/-)-baclofen-induced antinociception. 3. CGP 35348 did not modify oxotremorine- and morphine-induced antinociception in mice and rats. 4. CGP 35348 (2.5 micrograms i.c.v. per mouse) also prevented (+/-)-baclofen-induced impairment of the rota-rod test. 5. Two other GABAB antagonists, phaclofen (50 micrograms i.c.v. per mouse) and 2-OH-saclofen (2.5 micrograms-10 micrograms i.c.v. per mouse) did not modify (+/-)-baclofen-induced antinociception. 7. These results suggest that, at present, CGP 35348 is the only compound able to antagonize (+/-)-baclofen-induced antinociception.

Investigation into atropine-induced antinociception.

1. The effect of atropine on the nociceptive system was examined in mice and rats by use of the hot-plate, writhing and tail-flick tests. 2. Atropine dose-dependently produced analgesia, no effect and hyperalgesia. Analgesia was observed in both species with doses ranging from 1 to 100 micrograms kg-1 while hyperalgesia was obtained with 5 mg kg-1. 3. Atropine antinociception was prevented by pirenzepine (0.1 microgram per mouse, i.c.v.), dicyclomine (10 mg kg-1, i.p.), atropine-methylbromide (0.5 microgram per mouse, i.c.v.) and hemicholinium-3 (1 microgram per mouse, i.c.v.). Naloxone (1 mg kg-1, i.p.), alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (100 mg kg-1, s.c.) and reserpine (2 mg kg-1, i.p.) were ineffective. 4. The site of atropine analgesia is in the CNS since it exerts its antinociceptive effect also when injected i.c.v. (1-10 ng per mouse). Moreover drugs which do not cross the blood-brain barrier, such as hemicholinium-3, pirenzepine and atropine methylbromide, were unable to antagonize atropine analgesia if administered i.p. 5. Atropine also in vitro, showed a biphasic action on electrically-evoked guinea-pig ileum contractions. Concentrations between 10(-14) and 10(-12) M increased electrically and nicotine-evoked contractions but did not affect acetylcholine- and oxotremorine-evoked contractions. Concentrations above 10(-9) M inhibited both electrically- and drug (acetylcholine, nicotine and oxotremorine)-evoked contractions while they were ineffective on unstimulated ileum. 6. On the basis of the above findings, amplification of cholinergic transmission by very low doses of atropine is postulated, through a selective blockade of presynaptic muscarinic autoreceptors, as the likely mechanism of action. 7. Atropine antinociception, unlike oxotremorine antinociception, was obtained without any impairment of mouse rota-rod performance. 8. The antagonism by pirenzepine and dicyclomine of oxotremorine and atropine antinociception suggests that M1 muscarinic receptor subtypes are responsible for cholinergic analgesia.

Bicuculline actions on isolated rat atria, mouse vas-deferens and guinea-pig ileum are unrelated to GABA A receptor blockade.

1. Some new pharmacological activities of bicuculline were found in isolated rat atria, mouse vas deferens and guinea-pig ileum. 2. In isolated rat atria bicuculline (10-300 microM) induced potent positive inotropic and negative chronotropic effects which were not antagonized by propranolol (1 microM), 6-hydroxydopamine pretreatment (50 mg/kg i.v. twice), ranitidine (3 microM) or atropine (1 microM). Bicuculline (10-300 microM) potentiated electrically evoked contractions in mouse vas deferens and inhibited them (30-500 microM) in guinea-pig ileum. It was inactive on unstimulated mouse vas deferens. 3. The above effects were completely reproduced by the bicuculline related-substance, beta-hydrastine, but not by the bicuculline N-methyl derivative, bicuculline methiodide (BMI), on the isolated rat atria. BMI inhibited instead of potentiating the mouse vas deferens twitches and potentiated instead of inhibiting the guinea-pig ileum twitches. 4. Picrotoxin, the other classic non-competitive GABA A antagonist, was completely devoid of the effects reported for bicuculline. 5. We concluded that, on the three preparations studied, bicuculline possesses some effects which are unrelated to its GABA A receptor blocking activity.